Ethical Issues and Social Dilemmas in Knowledge Management: Organizational Innovation

Ethical Issues and Social Dilemmas in Knowledge Management: Organizational Innovation considers these dilemmas at two levels: the individual vs. individual and the individual vs. the collective, providing a thorough treatment of these facets. This book demonstrates the philosophical underpinnings of each dimension of knowledge management, exposing the ethical and social dilemmas that occur. It also links knowledge management and organizational innovation and proposes and explores strategies to minimize such dilemmas. This book clearly illustrates a whole new perspective on knowledge management, as well as expanding the literature treating this approach.

[1]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Need Satisfaction: A Motivational Basis of Performance and Weil‐Being in Two Work Settings1 , 2004 .

[2]  Justice, Gender, and the Family , 1991 .

[3]  Robert B. Burns,et al.  Introduction to Research Methods , 2015, Research Methods for Political Science.

[4]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Privacy and security as ideology , 2007, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[5]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems , 2002 .

[6]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[7]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Realizing Emancipatory Principles in Information Systems Development: The Case for ETHICS , 1994, MIS Q..

[8]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[9]  Chih-Chien Wang,et al.  The Influence of Ethical and Self-Interest Concerns on Knowledge Sharing Intentions among Managers: An Empirical Study , 2004 .

[10]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts , 2004 .

[11]  T. Davenport,et al.  Improving Knowledge Work Processes , 1996 .

[12]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[13]  E. Lambert,et al.  The Impact of Distributive and Procedural Justice on Social Service Workers , 2005 .

[14]  Monica Adya,et al.  Knowledge sharing and the psychological contract: Managing knowledge workers across different stages of employment , 2007 .

[15]  Emmanuel Saez,et al.  The Evolution of Top Incomes: A Historical and International Perspective , 2006 .

[16]  Zinta S. Byrne,et al.  Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice. , 2001 .

[17]  Adams Js.  Towards an understanding of inequity , 1963 .

[18]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing , 2006 .

[19]  G. Costa,et al.  Individual ethics and knowledge management: Arising conflicts , 2008 .

[20]  Alberto Petroni,et al.  MOTIVATION STRATEGIES FOR KNOWLEDGE WORKERS: EVIDENCES AND CHALLENGES , 2008 .

[21]  G. Currie,et al.  Human resource management and knowledge management: enhancing knowledge sharing in a pharmaceutical company , 2003 .

[22]  J. Gill,et al.  Research Methods For Managers , 1991 .

[23]  R. Noe,et al.  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research , 2010 .

[24]  Robert H. Moorman,et al.  Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice , 1993 .

[25]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[26]  Jarrod M. Haar,et al.  How does distributive justice affect work attitudes? The moderating effects of autonomy , 2009 .

[27]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Advances in Organizational Justice , 2001 .