Resilience of the rhizosphere to anthropogenic disturbance

The rhizosphere is a dominant site of microbial metabolism in soiland whereas it can be shown that anthropogenic disturbances can influence this metabolism,the impact of these disturbances on biodiversity is rather difficult to determineat the species level. This is in part because no more than 10% of the microbial species are culturable, and in part because there is very poor precision inplate counting, usually requiring a change of 300–500% to be significant. We have therefore used a functional approach. The `ecophysiological index' is based onr or K strategy of the organisms being counted. Also, enzyme families, microbial biomass,microbe/microbe and microbe/fauna interactions have been determined,along with nutrient uptake measurements. The techniques have been applied to determinethe effects of disturbances created by the introduction of GM plants and microorganismsto soil, these effects being small compared with those caused by time-honoured practices such as crop rotation and ploughing. Toxicity from industrial influences(e.g. cyanide) can be remediated by rhizosphere microorganisms.

[1]  E. Paul,et al.  APPLICABILITY OF THE CARBON‐DATING METHOD OF ANALYSIS TO SOIL HUMUS STUDIES , 1967 .

[2]  David S. Powlson,et al.  The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil—V: A method for measuring soil biomass , 1976 .

[3]  J. Lynch,et al.  Cultivation and the soil biomass , 1980 .

[4]  J. Lynch,et al.  Effects of season, cultivation and nitrogen fertiliser on the size of the soil microbial biomass , 1982 .

[5]  J. Lynch,et al.  Substrate flow and utilization in the rhizosphere of cereals , 1983 .

[6]  J. Lynch,et al.  The Influence of the Rhizosphere on Crop Productivity , 1986 .

[7]  B. Schippers,et al.  Microbial cyanide production in the rhizosphere in relation to potato yield reduction and Pseudomonas SPP-mediated plant growth-stimulation , 1987 .

[8]  R. Papendick,et al.  Soil quality—The key to a sustainable agriculture , 1992 .

[9]  F. O'Gara,et al.  Exploitation of gene(s) involved in 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol biosynthesis to confer a new biocontrol capability to a Pseudomonas strain , 1992, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  D. Greenland,et al.  Soil Resilience and Sustainable Land Use , 1994 .

[11]  M. Bailey,et al.  Survival, Colonization and Dispersal of Genetically Modified Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 in the Phytosphere of Field Grown Sugar Beet , 1995, Bio/Technology.

[12]  J. Lynch,et al.  Impact of Field Release of Genetically Modified Pseudomonas fluorescens on Indigenous Microbial Populations of Wheat , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[13]  J. Lynch,et al.  Field Release of a Genetically Modified Pseudomonas fluorescens on Wheat: Establishment, Survival and Dissemination , 1995, Bio/Technology.

[14]  M. Mazzola,et al.  Variation in Sensitivity of Gaeumannomyces graminis to Antibiotics Produced by Fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. and Effect on Biological Control of Take-All of Wheat , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[15]  B. Duffy,et al.  Zinc Improves Biocontrol of Fusarium Crown and Root Rot of Tomato by Pseudomonas fluorescens and Represses the Production of Pathogen Metabolites Inhibitory to Bacterial Antibiotic Biosynthesis. , 1997, Phytopathology.

[16]  J. Lynch,et al.  Rhizosphere soil enzymes as indicators of perturbations caused by enzyme substrate addition and inoculation of a genetically modified strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens on wheat seed , 1997 .

[17]  J. Lynch,et al.  Interactions between Fusarium culmorum and its potential biocontrol agent, Trichoderma harzianum, in a packed-bed, continuous-flow column reactor , 1997 .

[18]  Andrade,et al.  Plant mediated interactions between Pseudomonas fluorescens, Rhizobium leguminosarum and arbuscular mycorrhizae on pea , 1998 .

[19]  J. Lynch,et al.  Impact of wild‐type and genetically modified Pseudomonas fluorescens on soil enzyme activities and microbial population structure in the rhizosphere of pea , 1998 .

[20]  C. Knowles,et al.  Biodegradation of metal cyanides by mixed and pure cultures of fungi , 1998 .

[21]  M. Bailey,et al.  Effect of Insertion Site and Metabolic Load on the Environmental Fitness of a Genetically Modified Pseudomonas fluorescensIsolate , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  J. Lynch,et al.  Effect of Introduced Pseudomonas fluorescens Strains on Soil Nematode and Protozoan Populations in the Rhizosphere of Wheat and Pea , 1999, Microbial Ecology.

[23]  J. Lynch,et al.  Effects of Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 on Ecological Functions in the Pea Rhizosphere Are Dependent on pH , 1999, Microbial Ecology.

[24]  J. Lynch,et al.  Effect of 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol Producing, Overproducing, and Nonproducing Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 in the Rhizosphere of Pea , 2001, Microbial Ecology.

[25]  J. Lynch,et al.  Biocontrol of Pythium in the pea rhizosphere by antifungal metabolite producing and non‐producing Pseudomonas strains , 2001, Journal of applied microbiology.

[26]  Roberto Pinton,et al.  The rhizosphere : biochemistry and organic substances at the soil-plant interface , 2007 .

[27]  A. de Neergaard,et al.  Influence of the rhizosphere on microbial biomass and recently formed organic matter , 2001 .

[28]  R. Burns,et al.  A sensitive method for measuring cyanide and cyanogenic glucosides in sand culture and soil , 1987, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[29]  J. Lynch,et al.  The use of colony development for the characterization of bacterial communities in soil and on roots , 2004, Microbial Ecology.