A K-complementarity Technique for Forming Groups of Tutors in Intelligent Learning Environments

In e-learning environments, tutors perform the main function of tutoring. They follow up learners and answer their assistance requests which require different skills. These requests may not belong to the tutors’ skills and competencies, so collaboration among other tutors is expected. In fact, this collaboration can improve tutors’ skills and provide learners with effective monitoring. It can be permanent and adaptive, according to learners’ needs and requests. Grouping tutors with different skills is the aim of this research. In this paper, a new technique for grouping tutors is presented. The proposed technique is called K-complementarity. It is based on the complementarity of roles that are assigned to tutors. K-complementarity is based on tutor model and aims at obtaining K groups of tutors who have the most of the roles and skills. The proposed technique has been used by a Computer-Supported Collaborative Tutoring (CSCTT) system. This system had been tested in an Algerian University. The obtained results showed that the groups’ members are heterogeneous and the groups are homogeneous. Furthermore, each group had more than 80% of the roles by combining those of its members. So, these results can be considered as acceptable and very encouraging.

[1]  Daniel V. Eastmond E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online , 2003 .

[2]  Yacine Lafifi,et al.  Study of the Impact of Collaboration among Teachers in a Collaborative Authoring System , 2010 .

[4]  A. Fletcher,et al.  The role of tutors in peer led teaching , 2014 .

[5]  Yacine Lafifi,et al.  Initializing the Tutor Model Using K-Means Algorithm , 2013, Modeling Approaches and Algorithms for Advanced Computer Applications.

[6]  Philip Barker,et al.  On Being an Online Tutor , 2002 .

[7]  Theodoros Lappas,et al.  Finding a team of experts in social networks , 2009, KDD.

[8]  S. Lindblom-Ylänne,et al.  How do tutors intervene when conflicts on knowledge arise in tutorial groups? , 2014, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[9]  Élise Garrot,et al.  Plate-forme support à l'interconnexion de communautés de pratique ( ICP ) : application au tutorat avec TE-Cap , 2008 .

[10]  N. Moore,et al.  Review of E-moderating—the key to teaching and learning online , 2002 .

[11]  Kathryn Waite,et al.  The Role and Responsibilities of an E-tutor Librarian , 2011 .

[12]  Yacine Lafifi,et al.  Architecture of a collaborative tutoring system , 2012 .

[13]  François Legras,et al.  LOTTO: group formation by overhearing in large teams , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[14]  Márcia Cristina Moraes,et al.  CV-Muzar Using a Multiagent System for Group Formation , 2009, WCCE.

[15]  C. Vleuten,et al.  Is Tutor Performance Dependent on the Tutorial Group's Productivity?: Toward Further Resolving of Inconsistencies in Tutor Performance , 1999 .

[16]  Chris Mellish,et al.  Modelling human tutors' feedback to inform natural language interfaces for learning , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Sara Cushing Weigle,et al.  Novice Tutors and Their ESL Tutees: Three Case Studies of Tutor Roles and Perceptions of Tutorial Success. , 2004 .

[18]  J. Daniel,et al.  Making Sense of MOOCs : Musings in a Maze of Myth , Paradox and Possibility Author : , 2013 .

[19]  Amaury Daele,et al.  Le tuteur en ligne, quelles conditions d'efficacité dans un dispositif d'apprentissage collaboratif à distance ? , 2002 .

[20]  Luca Becchetti,et al.  Online team formation in social networks , 2012, WWW.

[21]  Brian Hudson,et al.  Open and flexible learning? An evaluation of student and tutor experiences in a European e‐learning community , 2006 .

[22]  A. Jinks,et al.  Personal tutors' views of their role with pre-registration nursing students: an exploratory study. , 2005, Nurse education today.

[23]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  What (Use) is a MOOC? , 2013, LTEC.

[24]  Martin Valcke,et al.  Cross-age peer tutors in asynchronous discussion groups: Exploring the impact of three types of tutor training on patterns in tutor support and on tutor characteristics , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Paul Hyman In the year of disruptive education , 2012, CACM.

[26]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Student and tutor perceptions of effective tutoring in distance education , 2009 .

[27]  Katherine Deibel,et al.  Team formation methods for increasing interaction during in-class group work , 2005, ITiCSE '05.

[28]  A. Lejeune,et al.  Le tutorat en formation à distance , 2011 .

[29]  Daniela Tuparova,et al.  The "Jigsaw" collaborative method in e-learning environment Moodle , 2009, CompSysTech '09.

[30]  Birgitta Kopp,et al.  E-tutorial support for collaborative online learning: An explorative study on experienced and inexperienced e-tutors , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Joanna Kerridge Supporting student nurses on placement in nursing homes: the challenges for the link-tutor role. , 2008, Nurse education in practice.

[32]  Shogo Hayashi,et al.  Comparison of tutored group with tutorless group in problem-based mixed learning sessions: a randomized cross-matched study , 2013, BMC Medical Education.

[33]  Danuta Zakrzewska,et al.  Using Clustering Technique for Students' Grouping in Intelligent E-Learning Systems , 2008, USAB.

[34]  Jun Zhu,et al.  User grouping behavior in online forums , 2009, KDD.

[35]  Z. Berge e-Moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2013 .

[36]  Yacine Lafifi,et al.  Dynamic management of tutors' roles in an online learning system , 2010, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[37]  Spécificités du tutorat en langues , 2011 .

[38]  V. Glikman Apprenants et tuteurs : une approche européenne des médiations humaines , 2002 .

[39]  Abdelmalek Amine,et al.  Modeling Approaches and Algorithms for Advanced Computer Applications , 2013, Studies in Computational Intelligence.

[40]  Davinia Hernández Leo,et al.  COLLAGE: A collaborative Learning Design editor based on patterns , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[41]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Analysing the Impact of Built-In and External Social Tools in a MOOC on Educational Technologies , 2013, EC-TEL.

[42]  Michalis Xenos,et al.  COMPUTER AIDED EVALUATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION TUTORS’ PERFORMANCE , 2007 .

[43]  Joel A. Michael,et al.  Classifying Student Initiatives and Tutor Responses in Human Keyboard-to-Keyboard Tutoring Sessions , 2002 .

[44]  V. Cohen-Scali Sexe du tuteur et perception de l’avenir professionnel de jeunes en alternance : une recherche qualitative , 2013 .