RESULTS IN SLIDING AUTONOMY FOR MULTI-ROBOT SPATIAL ASSEMBLY

We have developed a software architecture for teams of robots and humans to jointly perform tightly coordinated tasks, such as assembly of structures in orbit or on planetary surfaces. While we envision that robots will autonomously perform such work in the future, the state of the art falls short of the capabilities necessary to handle all possible contingencies. Our architecture provides a principled methodology for human involvement to optimize both task efficiency and robustness by combining robot capability with human intuition. We call such mixed control strategies “sliding autonomy”. Robots accomplish as many of the tasks as they can autonomously, and human operators take over control to perform those that cannot be easily automated or to provide help when the robots fail. In this paper, we discuss results from recent experiments that quantify the effect of different levels of autonomy on the system’s overall performance. By introducing two modes of sliding autonomy, we are able to achieve the high reliability of a teleoperated system combined with the high efficiency of autonomous operation. The incurred mental demand of the operator is directly proportional to the increase in system efficiency.

[1]  Sanjiv Singh,et al.  User Modelling for Principled Sliding Autonomy in Human-Robot Teams , 2005 .

[2]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Human-Agent Teamwork and Adjustable Autonomy in Practice , 2003 .

[3]  Hrand Aghazarian,et al.  Precision Manipulation with Cooperative Robots , 2005 .

[4]  Robert R. Burridge,et al.  An Intelligent Software Architecture for Semi � autonomous Robot Control , 1999 .

[5]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[6]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  Adjustable Autonomy for Human-Centered Autonomous Systems on Mars , 1998 .

[7]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Towards Adjustable Autonomy for the Real World , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[8]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Experiments in adjustable autonomy , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236).

[9]  Henry Chadwick,et al.  An asker of questions , 1995 .

[10]  Michael A. Peshkin,et al.  Cobots: a novel material handling technology , 1998 .

[11]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  A general framework for cobot control , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[12]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  Experiments with an EVA Assistant Robot , 2003 .

[13]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[14]  Roger V. Bostelman,et al.  RoboCrane Project:: An Advanced Concept for Large Scale Manufacturing , 1996 .

[15]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Robot, asker of questions , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[16]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Preliminary results in sliding autonomy for assembly by coordinated teams , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).