Simple Systems and Phylogenetic Diversity

The simple systems methodology is a powerful reductionistic research strategy. It has problems as implemented in developmental genetics because the organisms studied are few and unrepresentative. Stronger inferences require independent arguments that key traits are widely distributed phylogenetically. Evolutionary and developmental mechanisms of generative entrenchment and self-organization provide possible support, and are also necessary components of a developmental systems approach.

[1]  Douglas H. Erwin,et al.  The Origin of Animal Body Plans , 1997 .

[2]  William C. Wimsatt,et al.  Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy , 1982 .

[3]  S. Gilbert Cells in search of community: Critiques of Weismannism and selectable units in ontogeny , 1992 .

[4]  S. Counce The Strategy of the Genes , 1958, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[5]  R. Raff Understanding Evolution: The Next Step. (Book Reviews: The Shape of Life. Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form.) , 1996 .

[6]  E. Greene A Diet-Induced Developmental Polymorphism in a Caterpillar , 1989, Science.

[7]  Lindley Darden,et al.  Discovering Complexity , 1996 .

[8]  J. Bolker,et al.  Model systems in developmental biology , 1995, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[9]  W. Bechtel Integrating Scientific Disciplines , 1986 .

[10]  R. Raff,et al.  Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[11]  S. Newman,et al.  Generic physical mechanisms of tissue morphogenesis: A common basis for development and evolution , 1994 .

[12]  N. Rasmussen A new model of developmental constraints as applied to the Drosophila system. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[14]  William C. Wimsatt,et al.  Developmental Constraints, Generative Entrenchment, and the Innate-Acquired Distinction , 1986 .