Collaborative Robotics, More Than Just Working in Groups

The purpose of this study was to determine what collaborative interventions produce positive effects for students working on collaborative robotics projects for science process skills, collaborative problem-solving, and learning motivation. In addition, the study examined the impact students’ prior robotics experience had on science process skills, collaborative problem-solving, and learning motivation. The results indicated experience level and collaboration interventions can have impacts on students. Assigned Group Roles had positive effects on students’ motivation and collaborative problem-solving. Experience level also had effects upon student learning motivation and collaborative problem-solving with the Novice status associated with higher levels as compared with students who had more experience. A collaboration intervention was identified that has the potential to produce positive effects for students in collaborative robotics projects as well as assist classroom educators in the purposeful design of collaborative robotics projects with scientifically based strategies to improve the attitudinal outcomes for students of various robotics experience.

[1]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving , 2009 .

[2]  Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti,et al.  Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Sibel Somyürek,et al.  An effective educational tool: construction kits for fun and meaningful learning , 2015 .

[4]  T. Reeves.  Can Educational Research Be Both Rigorous and Relevant , 2011 .

[5]  Elliott Ostler,et al.  Robotics and Problem-Based Learning in STEM Formal Educational Environments , 2012 .

[6]  Thomas J. Cheatham,et al.  The Impact of Modeling Instruction within the Inverted Curriculum , 2013 .

[7]  Wu-Yuin Hwang,et al.  A case study of collaboration with multi-robots and its effect on children's interaction , 2014, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[8]  Michelle E. Jordan,et al.  Managing Uncertainty During Collaborative Problem Solving in Elementary School Teams: The Role of Peer Influence in Robotics Engineering Activity , 2014 .

[9]  J. V. RINGWOOD,et al.  Teaching engineering design through Lego® MindstormsTM , 2004 .

[10]  Ghazi Shukur,et al.  The Effect of LEGO Training on Pupils' School Performance in Mathematics, Problem Solving Ability and Attitude: Swedish Data , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[11]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Designing Evaluations for K-12 Robotics Education Programs , 2012 .

[12]  John Ringwood,et al.  Teaching engineering design through Lego® Mindstorms™ , 2005 .

[13]  Mike Carbonaro,et al.  Scaffolding Knowledge Construction through Robotic Technology: A Middle School Case Study , 2007 .

[14]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[15]  Jungho Park.  Effect of Robotics enhanced inquiry based learning in elementary Science education in South Korea. , 2015 .

[16]  Margaret J. Mohr-Schroeder,et al.  Developing Middle School Students' Interests in STEM via Summer Learning Experiences: See Blue STEM Camp , 2014 .

[17]  Amy Eguchi,et al.  Educational Robotics Theories and Practice: Tips for how to do it Right , 2012 .

[18]  Carolyn M. Callahan,et al.  Instruments Used in the Identification of Gifted and Talented Students , 1995 .

[19]  Viacheslav I. Adamchuk,et al.  Robots in K-12 Education: A New Technology for Learning , 2012 .

[20]  M. Robinson.  Robotics-Driven Activities: Can They Improve Middle School Science Learning? , 2005 .

[21]  Carl A. Nelson.  Generating Transferable Skills in STEM through Educational Robotics , 2012 .

[22]  K. Cagiltay,et al.  Design and development issues for educational robotics training camps , 2014 .

[23]  Nancy N. Heilbronner,et al.  The Effects of Using Interactive Student Notebooks and Specific Written Feedback on Seventh Grade Students' Science Process Skills. , 2013 .

[24]  Ji Yong Park,et al.  The architecture of children’s use of language and tools when problem solving collaboratively with robotics , 2013 .

[25]  Bing Chen,et al.  Using Robotics to Equip K-12 Teachers: Silicon Prairie Initiative for Robotics in Information Technology (SPIRIT) , 2009 .

[26]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[27]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Student Satisfaction and Self-Efficacy in a Cooperative Robotics Course , 2010 .

[28]  Suzanne H. Chapin.  Classroom Discussions: Using Math Talk to Help Students Learn, Grades 1-6 , 2003 .

[29]  Alanah-Rei Castledine,et al.  Lego robotics : an authentic problem solving tool? , 2011 .

[30]  Brigitte Denis,et al.  Collaborative learning in an educational robotics environment , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Florence R. Sullivan.  Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding , 2008 .

[32]  Jeong-Im Choi,et al.  Constructivist research in educational technology: A retrospective view and future prospects , 2007 .

[33]  Timothy T. Yuen,et al.  Group Tasks, Activities, Dynamics, and Interactions in Collaborative Robotics Projects with Elementary and Middle School Children. , 2014 .

[34]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Robotics in the early childhood classroom: learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade , 2015, International Journal of Technology and Design Education.

[35]  M. Bers.  The TangibleK Robotics Program: Applied Computational Thinking for Young Children. , 2010 .

[36]  Blaine A. Price,et al.  Using Robotics to Motivate ‘Back Door’ Learning , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[37]  P. Pintrich.  A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[38]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment , 2007 .

[39]  Doug Clarke,et al.  A designer speaks , 2011 .

[40]  S. Blanchard,et al.  Strategies used by elementary schoolchildren solving robotics-based complex tasks: innovative potential of technology , 2010 .

[41]  Adem Karahoca,et al.  Robotics teaching in primary school education by project based learning for supporting science and technology courses , 2011, WCIT.

[42]  Robyn M. Gillies.  The teacher's role in promoting dialogic talk in the collaborative classroom , 2014 .

[43]  Lou Slangen,et al.  What pupils can learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments , 2011 .

[44]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Impact of Robotics and Geospatial Technology Interventions on Youth STEM Learning and Attitudes , 2010 .

[45]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  The effectiveness of using a robotics class to foster collaboration among groups of children with autism in an exploratory study , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.