Scale versus Scope in the Diffusion of New Technology: Evidence from the Farm Tractor

Using the farm tractor as a case study, I show that lags in technology diffusion arise along two distinct margins, which I term scale and scope. Though tractors are now used in nearly every agricultural field operation and in the production of nearly all crops, they first developed with much more limited application. Early diffusion was accordingly rapid in these narrower applications, but limited in scope until tractor technology generalized. The sequence of diffusion is consistent with a model of R&D in specific- versus general-purpose attributes and with other historical examples, suggesting that the key to understanding technology diffusion lies not only in explaining the number of different users, but also in explaining the number of different uses.

[1]  Eugene Silberberg,et al.  The Diffusion of Tractor Technology , 2006 .

[2]  Timothy G. Conley.  GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence , 1999 .

[3]  Wilbur John Coleman,et al.  The World Technology Frontier , 2000 .

[4]  Z. Griliches.  HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[5]  Gary D. Libecap,et al.  The Economics of Climate Change: Adaptations Past and Present , 2011 .

[6]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Productivity Differences , 1999 .

[7]  Jonathan Robinson,et al.  How High Are Rates of Return to Fertilizer? Evidence from Field Experiments in Kenya , 2008 .

[8]  Alan L. Olmstead,et al.  Historical Statistics of the United States , 2006 .

[9]  Moses S. Musoke.  Mechanizing cotton production in the American south: The tractor, 1915-1960 , 1981 .

[10]  R. Hornbeck,et al.  BARBED WIRE : PROPERTY RIGHTS AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT ∗ , 2009 .

[11]  William J. White.  AN UNSUNG HERO: THE FARM TRACTOR'S CONTRIBUTION TO TWENTIETH-CENTURY UNITED STATES ECONOMIC GROWTH , 2001, The Journal of Economic History.

[12]  J. Wallis,et al.  Can the New Deal&Apos;S Three R&Apos;S Be Rehabilitated? A Program-by-Program, County-by-County Analysis , 2002 .

[13]  P. Rhode,et al.  The agricultural mechanization controversy of the interwar years , 1994 .

[14]  R. Steckel,et al.  Engines of Growth: Farm Tractors and Twentieth-Century U.S. Economic Welfare , 2012 .

[15]  P. Dupas.  Short-Run Subsidies and Long-Run Adoption of New Health Products: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2010, Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society.

[16]  T. Colbert.  Iowa Farmers and Mechanical Corn Pickers, 1900–1952 , 2000, Agricultural History.

[17]  L. Alston.  Farm Foreclosures in the United States During the Interwar Period , 1983, The Journal of Economic History.

[18]  New Deal Regulation and the Revolution in American Farm Productivity. A Case Study of the Diffusion of the Tractor in the Corn Ielt, 1920–1940 , 1991 .

[19]  Kaivan Munshi.  Social learning in a heterogeneous population: technology diffusion in the Indian Green Revolution , 2004 .

[20]  Susanto Basu,et al.  Appropriate Technology and Growth , 1996 .

[21]  R. Hornbeck,et al.  Railroads and American Economic Growth: a "Market Access" Approach , 2013 .

[22]  Robert C. Williams,et al.  Fordson, Farmall, and Poppin' Johnny: A History of the Farm Tractor and Its Impact on America , 1987 .

[23]  Warren C. Whatley.  A History of Mechanization in the Cotton South: The Institutional Hypothesis , 1985 .

[24]  A. Olmstead.  The Mechanization of Reaping and Mowing in American Agriculture, 1833–1870 , 1975, The Journal of Economic History.