How Secure Is In Vivo Synaptic Transmission at the Calyx of Held?

The medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) receives excitatory input from giant presynaptic terminals, the calyces of Held. The MNTB functions as a sign inverter giving inhibitory input to the lateral and medial superior olive, where its input is important in the generation of binaural sensitivity to cues for sound localization. Extracellular recordings from MNTB neurons show complex spikes consisting of a prepotential, thought to reflect synaptic activation, followed by a postsynaptic action potential. This makes the synapse ideal to study synaptic transmission in vivo because presynaptic and postsynaptic activity can be monitored with a single electrode. Recent in vivo and in vitro studies have observed isolated prepotentials in the MNTB suggesting that, under certain stimulus conditions, synaptic transmission fails. We investigated synaptic transmission at the calyx of Held in the MNTB of the adult cat and concluded that synaptic transmission was completely secure in terms of rate of transmitted spikes. However, synaptic transmission was found to be less secure in terms of timing. With increasing spike rate, the synaptic delay showed an increase of up to 100 μs, as well as a decrease in amplitude of the action potential. This variability in delay is of a surprisingly high magnitude given the hypothesized role of these binaural circuits in sound localization and given the fact that this is one of the largest synapses in the mammalian brain.

[1]  T. Yin,et al.  Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  T. Yin,et al.  Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. III. Comparison with afferent pathways. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Spirou,et al.  Recordings from cat trapezoid body and HRP labeling of globular bushy cell axons. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  D. Yurgelun-Todd,et al.  The neuronal architecture of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat in the region of the cochlear nerve root: Horseradish peroxidase labelling of identified cell types , 1982, Neuroscience.

[5]  Alberto Recio-Spinoso,et al.  Auditory Midbrain and Nerve Responses to Sinusoidal Variations in Interaural Correlation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Lu-Yang Wang,et al.  Activity‐dependent changes in temporal components of neurotransmission at the juvenile mouse calyx of Held synapse , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  B. Grothe,et al.  New roles for synaptic inhibition in sound localization , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  L A JEFFRESS,et al.  A place theory of sound localization. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[9]  T. Yin,et al.  Interaural Phase and Level Difference Sensitivity in Low-Frequency Neurons in the Lateral Superior Olive , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  B. Grothe,et al.  Precise inhibition is essential for microsecond interaural time difference coding , 2002, Nature.

[11]  H. von Gersdorff,et al.  Fine-Tuning an Auditory Synapse for Speed and Fidelity: Developmental Changes in Presynaptic Waveform, EPSC Kinetics, and Synaptic Plasticity , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  C Tsuchitani,et al.  Stimulus level of dichotically presented tones and cat superior olive S-segment cell dcharge. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Guinan,et al.  Signal processing in brainstem auditory neurons which receive giant endings (calyces of Held) in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body of the cat , 1990, Hearing Research.

[14]  P X Joris,et al.  Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. II. Responses in the tuning curve tail. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Caton Fenz Leveraging local funds to expand coverage in lean times. , 2003, State Coverage Initiatives issue brief : a national initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

[16]  B. Grothe,et al.  Synaptic transmission at the calyx of Held under in vivo like activity levels. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Pre‐ and postsynaptic whole‐cell recordings in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body of the rat. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  R. Rübsamen,et al.  The Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body in the Gerbil Is More Than a Relay: Comparison of Pre- and Postsynaptic Activity , 2003, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[19]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Binocular Vision and Stereopsis , 1996 .

[20]  R. Rübsamen,et al.  Decreased Temporal Precision of Auditory Signaling in Kcna1-Null Mice: An Electrophysiological Study In Vivo , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  D. H. Louage,et al.  Enhanced Temporal Response Properties of Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus Neurons to Broadband Noise , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  C. Tsuchitani Input from the medial nucleus of trapezoid body to an interaural level detector , 1997, Hearing Research.

[23]  M. Sachs,et al.  Classification of unit types in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus: PST histograms and regularity analysis. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  P. H. Smith,et al.  Intracellular recordings from neurobiotin-labeled cells in brain slices of the rat medial nucleus of the trapezoid body , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  L H Carney,et al.  Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. I. Responses to tones at the characteristic frequency. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  R. Quian Quiroga,et al.  Unsupervised Spike Detection and Sorting with Wavelets and Superparamagnetic Clustering , 2004, Neural Computation.

[27]  Pascal Michelet,et al.  Variations on a Dexterous theme: Peripheral time–intensity trading , 2008, Hearing Research.

[28]  D. Caspary Superior olivary complex-Functional neuropharmacology of the principal cell types , 1991 .

[29]  T. Yin,et al.  Anatomy and physiology of principal cells of the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) of the cat. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  D. McCormick,et al.  Multiple large inputs to principal cells in the mouse medial nucleus of the trapezoid body. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  J. Boudreau,et al.  Binaural interaction in the cat superior olive S segment. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  J. Guinan,et al.  Single Auditory Units in the Superior Olivary Complex: II: Locations of Unit Categories and Tonotopic Organization , 1972 .

[33]  Philip H Smith,et al.  Projections of physiologically characterized globular bushy cell axons from the cochlear nucleus of the cat , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  L. Trussell,et al.  Activation and deactivation of voltage-dependent K+ channels during synaptically driven action potentials in the MNTB. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  J. Guinan,et al.  Single auditory units in the superior olivary complex , 1972 .

[36]  Eytan Domany,et al.  Superparamagnetic Clustering of Data , 1996 .