Modelling the solar wind interaction with Mercury by a quasi-neutral hybrid model

Abstract. Quasi-neutral hybrid model is a self-consistent modelling approach that includes positively charged particles and an electron fluid. The approach has received an increasing interest in space plasma physics research because it makes it possible to study several plasma physical processes that are difficult or impossible to model by self-consistent fluid models, such as the effects associated with the ions’ finite gyroradius, the velocity difference between different ion species, or the non-Maxwellian velocity distribution function. By now quasi-neutral hybrid models have been used to study the solar wind interaction with the non-magnetised Solar System bodies of Mars, Venus, Titan and comets. Localized, two-dimensional hybrid model runs have also been made to study terrestrial dayside magnetosheath. However, the Hermean plasma environment has not yet been analysed by a global quasi-neutral hybrid model. In this paper we present a new quasi-neutral hybrid model developed to study various processes associated with the Mercury-solar wind interaction. Emphasis is placed on addressing advantages and disadvantages of the approach to study different plasma physical processes near the planet. The basic assumptions of the approach and the algorithms used in the new model are thoroughly presented. Finally, some of the first three-dimensional hybrid model runs made for Mercury are presented. The resulting macroscopic plasma parameters and the morphology of the magnetic field demonstrate the applicability of the new approach to study the Mercury-solar wind interaction globally. In addition, the real advantage of the kinetic hybrid model approach is to study the property of individual ions, and the study clearly demonstrates the large potential of the approach to address these more detailed issues by a quasi-neutral hybrid model in the future. Key words. Magnetospheric physics (planetary magnetospheres; solar wind-magnetosphere interactions) – Space plasma physics (numerical simulation studies)

[1]  H. Shinagawa,et al.  Global hybrid simulation of the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at the Venus ionopause , 2002 .

[2]  C. Russell,et al.  Disturbances in Mercury's magnetosphere: Are the Mariner 10 “substorms” simply driven? , 1998 .

[3]  Thomas A. Bida,et al.  Discovery of calcium in Mercury's atmosphere , 2000, Nature.

[4]  Paul R. Woodward,et al.  On the Divergence-free Condition and Conservation Laws in Numerical Simulations for Supersonic Magnetohydrodynamical Flows , 1998 .

[5]  H. Shimazu.  Three-dimensional hybrid simulation of magnetized plasma flow around an obstacle , 1999 .

[6]  S. Brecht,et al.  Global hybrid simulation of unmagnetized planets: Comparison of Venus and Mars , 1991 .

[7]  N. Omidi,et al.  Simulation of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Outer Regions of the Coma (GRL 13(4) 1986) , 1986 .

[8]  J. Spreiter,et al.  A new predictive model for determining solar wind-terrestrial planet interactions , 1980 .

[9]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  A new functional form to study the solar wind control of the magnetopause size and shape , 1997 .

[10]  C. Russell,et al.  Comparison of three magnetopause prediction models under extreme solar wind conditions , 2001 .

[11]  Kenneth G. Powell,et al.  Interaction of Mercury with the Solar Wind , 1998 .

[12]  R. Grard.  Photoemission on the surface of Mercury and related electrical phenomena , 1997 .

[13]  W. Ip.  Time-variable phenomena in the magnetosphere and exosphere of Mercury , 1997 .

[14]  J. Sauvaud,et al.  Centrifugal acceleration of ions near Mercury , 2002 .

[15]  V. Riccardo,et al.  Blob Method for Kinetic Plasma Simulation with Variable-Size Particles , 1996 .

[16]  Pekka Janhunen,et al.  Ion escape from Mars in a quasi‐neutral hybrid model , 2002 .

[17]  James A. Slavin,et al.  The effect of erosion on the solar wind stand-off distance at Mercury , 1979 .

[18]  E. Kallio,et al.  Atmospheric effects of proton precipitation in the Martian atmosphere and its connection to the Mars‐solar wind interaction , 2001 .

[19]  R W Hockney,et al.  Computer Simulation Using Particles , 1966 .

[20]  T. Cravens,et al.  One‐dimensional hybrid simulations of the diamagnetic cavity boundary region of comet Halley , 1995 .

[21]  Pekka Janhunen,et al.  The response of the Hermean magnetosphere to the interplanetary magnetic field , 2004 .

[22]  Rosemary M. Killen,et al.  The surface‐bounded atmospheres of Mercury and the Moon , 1999 .

[23]  Bernard V. Jackson,et al.  Evidence for space weather at Mercury , 2001 .

[24]  Y. Lin.  Global hybrid simulation of the dayside reconnection layer and associated field‐aligned currents , 2001 .

[25]  D. Larson,et al.  Simulation of the Saturnian magnetospheric interaction with Titan , 2000 .

[26]  W. Ip,et al.  MHD simulations of the solar wind interaction with Mercury , 2002 .

[27]  W. Ip.  Dynamics of electrons and heavy ions in Mercury's magnetosphere , 1987 .

[28]  S. Brecht,et al.  Three-dimensional simulations of the solar wind interaction with Mars , 1993 .

[29]  C. Russell,et al.  The magnetosphere of Mercury , 1988 .

[30]  James A. Slavin,et al.  Solar wind flow about the terrestrial planets 1. Modeling bow shock position and shape , 1981 .