Auditory brainstem evoked potentials peak identification by finite impulse response digital filters.

Linear phase finite impulse response (FIR) filtering can be used to differentiate auditory brainstem evoked potentials (ABEP) components. The power spectrum of ABEP at high intensities indicates that they contain 3 frequency bands that can be distinguished by applying appropriate digital filters with the following characteristics: up to 240 Hz (revealing slow components), 240-483 Hz (resulting in medium components) and above 500 Hz (leaving only fast components). The results using these filters, indicate that the medium components coincide with peaks I, III and V and that the slow filter results in a 'pedestal' whose peak coincides with peak V. These findings were used for automatic identification of ABEP peaks. A coincidence of the 'pedestal' peak with a medium component was sought and labelled peak V. The preceding medium peaks were labelled, in order of decreasing latency, III and I. Validation of this procedure was conducted on ABEP from normal subjects, using different stimulus rates and intensities, as well as from selected neurological patients with lesions affecting the brainstem. Provided the waveform included a 'pedestal', the results proved this procedure to be reliable and in very good agreement with manual identification and measurement of ABEP peaks.

[1]  J R Boston,et al.  Effects of analog and digital filtering on brain stem auditory evoked potentials. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  A R Møller A digital filter for brain stem evoked responses. , 1980, American journal of otolaryngology.

[3]  J. Robert Boston,et al.  Spectra of Auditory Brainstem Responses and Spontaneous EEG , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  E R John,et al.  Normative values for brain stem auditory evoked potentials obtained by digital filtering and automatic peak detection. , 1982, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Slow Component of Auditory Brainstem Response, Intensity and Rate Function , 1983 .

[6]  O Ozdamar,et al.  Computer monitoring of auditory brainstem responses. , 1987, Computers in biology and medicine.

[7]  J R Boston,et al.  Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials. , 1985, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[8]  M. Hoke,et al.  Time- and intensity-dependent low-pass filtering of auditory brain stem responses. , 1984, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[9]  F Grandori,et al.  A method of digital filtering to enhance the peaks of evoked potentials: application to auditory brainstem responses. , 1988, British journal of audiology.

[10]  H Pratt,et al.  Application of finite impulse response digital filters to auditory brain-stem evoked potentials. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  A R Møller,et al.  Improving brain stem auditory evoked potential recordings by digital filtering. , 1983, Ear and hearing.

[12]  Tokuro Suzuki,et al.  Effects of stimulus repetition rate on slow and fast components of auditory brain-stem responses. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  L. Rabiner,et al.  A computer program for designing optimum FIR linear phase digital filters , 1973 .

[14]  E R John,et al.  Application of digital filtering and automatic peak detection to brain stem auditory evoked potential. , 1982, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  J. R. Boston Effects Of Digital Filtering On The Waveform & Peak Parameters Of The Auditory Brainstem Response , 1983 .

[16]  D. J. Doyle,et al.  Analogue and digital filtering of auditory brainstem responses. , 1981, Scandinavian audiology.

[17]  B. Scharf,et al.  Localized pontine 1esion , 1984, Neurology.