Plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate compared with open prostatectomy for prostates larger than 100 grams: a randomized noninferiority controlled trial with long-term results at 6 years.

[1]  Alexander Bachmann,et al.  EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. , 2013, European urology.

[2]  P. Gilling.  Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate vs open prostatectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia cases – a medium‐term, prospective, randomized comparison , 2013, BJU international.

[3]  Jian-ming Tan,et al.  Electrosurgical enucleation versus bipolar transurethral resection for prostates larger than 70 ml: a prospective, randomized trial with 5-year followup. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[4]  Jin-rui Yang,et al.  Prostatic Diseases and Male Voiding Dysfunction Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate Versus Transvesical Open Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia >80 mL: 12-Month Follow-up Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial , 2013 .

[5]  Naikai Liao,et al.  A study comparing plasmakinetic enucleation with bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. , 2012, Journal of endourology.

[6]  F. Chun,et al.  Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate and simple open prostatectomy--which procedure is faster? , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[7]  G. Zeng,et al.  Impact of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) on sexual function: results of a prospective trial. , 2012, The journal of sexual medicine.

[8]  A. Basiri,et al.  Open prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of the prostate, where are we standing in the new era? A randomized controlled trial. , 2010, Urology journal.

[9]  Chunxiao Liu,et al.  Transurethral enucleation and resection of prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia by plasma kinetics. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[10]  G. Zeng,et al.  A prospective, randomised trial comparing plasmakinetic enucleation to standard transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: three-year follow-up results. , 2010, European urology.

[11]  J. Lingeman,et al.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for prostates larger than 175 grams. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[12]  J. Lingeman,et al.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate--outcomes independent of prostate size? , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[13]  O. Göǧüs,et al.  Open prostatectomy is still a valid option for large prostates: a high-volume, single-center experience. , 2008, Urology.

[14]  S. Ahyai,et al.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. , 2008, European urology.

[15]  C. Stief,et al.  Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[16]  Hemendra N Shah,et al.  Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[17]  A. Westenberg,et al.  Randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of prostate with plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. , 2006, Urology.

[18]  Rainer Hofmann,et al.  Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention. , 2006, European urology.

[19]  A. Tubaro,et al.  The Current Role of Open Surgery in BPH , 2006 .

[20]  Andrea Salonia,et al.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g: 24-month follow-up. , 2006, European urology.

[21]  M. Elhilali,et al.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): the endourologic alternative to open prostatectomy. , 2006, European urology.

[22]  M. Elhilali,et al.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a size-independent new "gold standard". , 2005, Urology.

[23]  I. Varkarakis,et al.  Long-term results of open transvesical prostatectomy from a contemporary series of patients. , 2004, Urology.

[24]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[25]  S. Ahyai,et al.  Does perioperative outcome of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate depend on prostate size? , 2004, Journal of endourology.

[26]  R. Kuntz,et al.  Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transvesical open enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 gm.:: a randomized prospective trial of 120 patients. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[27]  F. Burkhard,et al.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate combined with electrocautery resection: the mushroom technique. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[28]  C. Vicentini,et al.  A prospective study of the safety and efficacy of suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[29]  P. Gilling,et al.  Holmium laser prostatectomy: a technique in evolution. , 1998, Current opinion in urology.