The endogenous role of location choice in product innovations

The location choice of product innovations is a prevalent phenomenon one that has received little attention in the literature. This study examines the ways in which comparative industry environment, technology and product characteristics, and entry timing affect the firm's location choice of new product development activities between headquarters and foreign subsidiaries and the implications of location choice for performance. Our findings indicate that: (1) firms are more likely to locate their new product development activities at foreign subsidiaries in mainland China than at headquarters in Taiwan when the industry environment at foreign subsidiaries is more favorable, when technologies and products are more mature, and when the entry to mainland China's market is earlier than that of its competitors; (2) in general, firms locating their new product development activities at headquarters in Taiwan perform better than firms locating their new product development activities at foreign subsidiaries in mainland China after controlling for endogeneity bias; (3) firms locating their new product development activities at headquarters (at foreign subsidiaries) perform better than if they had located their new product development activities at foreign subsidiaries (at headquarters). Managerial implications and future research directions are discussed.

[1]  M. Montoya-Weiss,et al.  Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products , 1998 .

[2]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[3]  Michael A. Stanko,et al.  Controversy in Innovation Outsourcing Research: Review, Synthesis and Future Directions , 2010 .

[4]  J. Dunning Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? , 1998 .

[5]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Motivations and Barriers of Foreign R&D Activities in China , 2004 .

[6]  J. Papastavrou,et al.  Accounting for Endogeneity When Assessing Strategy Performance: Does Entry Mode Choice Affect Fdi Survival , 1998 .

[7]  R. Cooper,et al.  An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact , 1986 .

[8]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Overhauling the new product process , 1996 .

[9]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Research that reinvents the corporation , 1991 .

[10]  J. Cantwell The Globalisation of Technology: What Remains of the Product Cycle Model? , 1995 .

[11]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[12]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[13]  J. V. Reenen,et al.  Export Market Performance of OECD countries: an empirical examination of the role of cost competitiveness , 1999 .

[14]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  On the Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches , 2015 .

[15]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[16]  Louis T. Wells,et al.  Technology Crossing Borders: The Choice, Transfer, and Management of International Technology Flows , 1985 .

[17]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[18]  G. Kalyanaram,et al.  Order-of-Entry Effects on Consumer Memory and Judgment: An Information Integration Perspective , 1992 .

[19]  Alden S. Bean,et al.  Meet Your Competition: Results from the 1994 IRI/CIMS Annual R&D Survey , 1996 .

[20]  E. Wang,et al.  Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach , 2007 .

[21]  Mehmet Demirbag,et al.  Factors Determining Offshore Location Choice for R&D Projects: A Comparative Study of Developed and Emerging Regions , 2010 .

[22]  R. Cooper,et al.  The Impact of Product Innovativeness on Performance , 1991 .

[23]  W. C. Kim,et al.  Global Strategy and Multinationals' Entry Mode Choice , 1992 .

[24]  James A. Wolff,et al.  Firm Characteristics and Managerial Perceptions of NAFTA: An Assessment of Export Implications for U.S. SMEs* , 2003 .

[25]  Nagesh Kumar Determinants of location of overseas R&D activity of multinational enterprises: the case of US and Japanese corporations , 2001 .

[26]  Robert T. Keller,et al.  A RESOURCE-BASED STUDY OF NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PREDICTING FIVE-YEAR LATER COMMERCIAL SUCCESS AND SPEED TO MARKET , 2004 .

[27]  Lee N. Davis,et al.  Subsidiary research and development, and the local environment , 2004 .

[28]  G. Day,et al.  Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage , 1994 .

[29]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  INNOVATION IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: CONTROL AND COMMUNICATION PATTERNS IN INTERNATIONAL R&D OPERATIONS , 1998 .

[30]  A. Joshi,et al.  Customer Knowledge Development: Antecedents and Impact on New Product Performance , 2004 .

[31]  S. Lall THE INTERNATIONAL ALLOCATION OF RESEARCH ACTIVITY BY US MULTINATIONALS*: INTERNATIONAL ALLOCATION OF RESEARCH ACTIVITY BY US MULTINATIONALS , 2009 .

[32]  Pär Åhlström,et al.  INFLUENCES ON ORGANISATIONAL SLACK IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS , 2006 .

[33]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS , 2002 .

[34]  Tony S. Frost The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations , 2001 .

[35]  J. Birkinshaw How Multinational Subsidiary Mandates are Gained and Lost , 1996 .

[36]  Raymond J. Mataloni,et al.  The structure of location choice for new U.S. manufacturing investments in Asia-Pacific , 2011 .

[37]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[38]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market Orientation and the Learning Organization , 1995 .

[39]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research , 2003 .

[40]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 1995 .

[41]  Fred Langerak,et al.  The Impact of Product Innovativeness on the Link between Development Speed and New Product Profitability , 2006 .

[42]  Arvind Sahay,et al.  The Role of Resource Access, Market Considerations, and the Nature of Innovation in Pursuit of Standards in the New Product Development Process , 2003 .

[43]  Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah The relationships among selected business environment factors and manufacturing strategy: insights from an emerging economy , 2003 .

[44]  Sanjaya Lall,et al.  The International Allocation of Research Activity by US Multinationals , 1979 .

[45]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[46]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Strategy Planning , 2003 .

[47]  Stephen Nickell,et al.  Competition and Crporate Performance , 1993 .

[48]  Chung-Ming Lau,et al.  Asset-Exploitation Versus Asset-Seeking: Implications for Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investment from Newly Industrialized Economies , 2002 .

[49]  Dongsheng Zhou,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of the strategic orientations in new product development: The case of Chinese manufacturers , 2006 .

[50]  S. Ramaswami,et al.  Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization Factors , 1992 .

[51]  María Jesús Nieto,et al.  Offshoring of R&D: Looking abroad to improve innovation performance , 2011 .

[52]  L W Fry,et al.  Technology-structure research: three critical issues. , 1982, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[53]  J. Dunning Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism , 1995 .

[54]  Glen L. Urban,et al.  Market Share Rewards to Pioneering Brands: An Empirical Analysis and Strategic Implications , 2015 .

[55]  W. J. Lane Product Differentiation in a Market with Endogenous Sequential Entry , 1980 .

[56]  Y. Todo,et al.  What determines overseas R&D activities? The case of Japanese multinational firms , 2008 .

[57]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[58]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  New product development team intelligence: Antecedents and consequences , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[59]  J. Birkinshaw Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations : The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives , 1997 .

[60]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Shortening the Product Development Cycle , 1992 .

[61]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[62]  S. Appold,et al.  Agglomeration, Interorganizational Networks, and Competitive Performance in the U.S. Metalworking Sector , 1995 .

[63]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Internal differentiation within multinational corporations , 1989 .

[64]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[65]  Nagesh Kumar,et al.  Globalization, Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfers : Impacts on and Prospects for Developing Countries , 1998 .

[66]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[67]  S. Nickell Competition and Corporate Performance , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[68]  Chung-Jen Chen,et al.  Information Technology, Organizational Structure, and New Product Development---The Mediating Effect of Cross-Functional Team Interaction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[69]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[70]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[71]  David P. McCaffrey,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. , 1995 .

[72]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making , 1997 .

[73]  Bernard L. Simonin Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[74]  Gary L. Ragatz,et al.  Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty , 2002 .

[75]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Corporate imagination and expeditionary marketing. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[76]  John Cantwell,et al.  MNE competence‐creating subsidiary mandates , 2005 .

[77]  R. Cooper,et al.  Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors , 1996 .

[78]  G. Foxall Corporate Innovation, Marketing and Strategy , 1983 .

[79]  Michael Song,et al.  The Effect of Perceived Technological Uncertainty on Japanese New Product Development , 2001 .

[80]  M. Parry,et al.  A Cross-National Comparative Study of New Product Development Processes: Japan and the United States , 1997 .

[81]  R. Blundell,et al.  Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms , 1999 .

[82]  David L. Deeds,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN HIGH TECHNOLOGY VENTURES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY FIRMS , 2000 .

[83]  J. Mullins,et al.  New Product Development in Rapidly Changing Markets: An Exploratory Study , 1998 .

[84]  Brian J. Fifarek,et al.  Offshoring and the global geography of innovation , 2010 .

[85]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[86]  Jin K. Han,et al.  Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link? , 1998 .

[87]  D. Hicks,et al.  The Maturation of Global Corporate R&D: Evidence from the Activity of U.S. Foreign Subsidiaries , 2007 .

[88]  D. Teece Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[89]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[90]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The impact of firmspecific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: Evidence from the biotechnology industry , 1997 .

[91]  Joe Tidd,et al.  The Influence of Project Novelty on the New Product Development Process , 2002 .

[92]  M. Dowling,et al.  Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms , 2003 .

[93]  A. Rasheed,et al.  Rational decision‐making and firm performance: the moderating role of the environment , 1997 .

[94]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[95]  Timothy B. Folta,et al.  Geographic cluster size and firm performance , 2006 .

[96]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance , 1997 .

[97]  A. Weinstein Foreign Investments by Service Firms: The Case of Multinational Advertising Agencies , 1977 .

[98]  Crystal X. Jiang,et al.  Location advantages and subsidiaries’ R&D activities in emerging economies: Exploring the effect of employee mobility , 2007 .

[99]  Mary B. Teagarden,et al.  Invisible costs in offshoring services work , 2008 .

[100]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Industrial firms' new product strategies , 1985 .

[101]  Fred Langerak,et al.  Understanding a Two-Sided Coin: Antecedents and Consequences of a Decomposed Product Advantage , 2008 .

[102]  Wolfgang Becker,et al.  R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry , 2004 .

[103]  Paul Geroski,et al.  Market Structure, Corporate Performance, and Innovative Activity , 1995 .

[104]  Leo Sleuwaegen,et al.  Offshoring as a survival strategy: evidence from manufacturing firms in Belgium , 2008 .

[105]  R. Mudambi Location, Control and Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Industries , 2008 .

[106]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Managing across Borders , 2003 .

[107]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Strategic Decision Comprehensiveness and New Product Development Outcomes in New Technology Ventures , 2004 .

[108]  Diana Farrell Offshoring: Value Creation Through Economic Change , 2005 .

[109]  C. Droge,et al.  Strategic fit to resources versus NPD execution proficiencies: what are their roles in determining success? , 2009 .

[110]  Robert Ronstadt,et al.  International R&D: The Establishment and Evolution of Research and Development Abroad by Seven U.S. Multinationals , 1978 .

[111]  P. McCann,et al.  Analytical Differences in the Economics of Geography: The Case of the Multinational Firm , 2005 .

[112]  R. Cordero Managing for speed to avoid product obsolescence: A survey of techniques , 1991 .