INDIVIDUAL LEARNING ABOUT CONSUMPTION

The standard approach to modelling consumption/saving problems is to assume that the decisionmaker is solving a dynamic stochastic optimization problem However under realistic descriptions of utility and uncertainty the optimal consumption/saving decision is so difficult that only recently economists have managed to find solutions using numerical methods that require previously infeasible amounts of computation Yet empirical evidence suggests that household behavior conforms fairly well with the prescriptions of the optimal solution raising the question of how average households can solve problems that economists until recently could not This paper examines whether consumers might be able to find a reasonably good ’rule-of-thumb?approximation to optimal behavior by trial-and-error methods as Friedman (1953) proposed long ago We find that such individual learning methods can reliably identify reasonably good rules of thumb only if the consumer is able to spend absurdly large amounts of time searching for a good rule

[1]  Arthur Hau.  Precautionary Saving and Mortality-Contingent Social Insurance Programs , 2001 .

[2]  H. Uhlig,et al.  Rule of Thumb and Dynamic Programming , 1995 .

[3]  T. Sargent.  Bounded rationality in macroeconomics , 1993 .

[4]  Kenneth E. Boulding,et al.  Essays in Positive Economics. , 1954 .

[5]  Jonathan A. Parker,et al.  Consumption Over the Life Cycle , 1999 .

[6]  C. Carroll,et al.  Buffer-Stock Saving and the Life Cycle/Permanent Income Hypothesis , 1996 .

[7]  Douglas Gale,et al.  What have we learned from social learning , 1996 .

[8]  S. Zeldes,et al.  The Importance of Precautionary Motives in Explaining Individual and Aggregate Saving , 1993 .

[9]  Christopher D. Carroll,et al.  ON THE CONCAVITY OF THE CONSUMPTION FUNCTION , 1995 .

[10]  S. Zeldes,et al.  Optimal Consumption with Stochastic Income: Deviations from Certainty Equivalence , 1989 .

[11]  S. Zeldes.  Optimal consumption with stochastic income , 1984 .

[12]  C. Carroll.  The Buffer-Stock Theory of Saving: Some Macroeconomic Evidence , 1992 .

[13]  T. Sargent,et al.  Convergence of Least Squares Learning Mechanisms in Self- Referential Linear Stochastic Models* , 1989 .

[14]  M. Cagetti,et al.  Wealth Accumulation Over the Life Cycle and Precautionary Savings , 2003 .

[15]  Jonathan McCarthy.  Imperfect insurance and differing propensities to consume across households , 1995 .

[16]  M. Lettau.  Explaining the facts with adaptive agents: The case of mutual fund flows , 1997 .

[17]  R. Hall.  Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence , 1978, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  R. Palmer,et al.  Asset Pricing Under Endogenous Expectations in an Artificial Stock Market , 1996 .

[19]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[20]  L. Samuelson.  Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection , 1997 .

[21]  Nicholas S. Souleles.  The Response of Household Consumption to Income Tax Refunds , 1999 .

[22]  R. Marimon.  Learning from learning in economics , 1996 .

[23]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  Learning from the behavior of others : conformity, fads, and informational cascades , 1998 .

[24]  LEARNING ECONOMICS , 1989, The Lancet.

[25]  A. Deaton.  Saving and Liquidity Constraints , 1989 .

[26]  Martin Browning,et al.  Household Saving: Micro Theories and Micro Facts , 1996 .

[27]  Jonathan A. Parker,et al.  The Reaction of Household Consumption to Predictable Changes in Social Security Taxes , 1999 .