The Concept of Validity in the Interpretation of Test Scores

with some independently observed criterion of the behavior under consideration. It is only as a measure of a specifically defined criterion that a test can be objectively validated at all. For example, unless we define &dquo;intelligence&dquo; as that combination of aptitudes required for successful school achievement, or for survival on a certain type of job, or in terms of some other observable criterion, we can never either prove

[1]  J. G. Jenkins Validity for what , 1946 .

[2]  J. Loevinger A systematic approach to the construction and evaluation of tests of ability. , 1947 .

[3]  F. Goodenough A critical note on the use of the term "reliability" in mental measurement. , 1936 .

[4]  J. W. Dunlap Comparable tests and reliability. , 1933 .

[5]  J. P. Foley,et al.  A proposed reorientation in the heredity-environment controversy. , 1948, Psychological review.

[6]  L. Cronbach Test “reliability”: Its meaning and determination , 1947, Psychometrika.

[7]  C H COOMBS,et al.  Some hypotheses for the analysis of qualitative variables. , 1948, Psychological review.

[8]  J. P. Guilford,et al.  New Standards For Test Evaluation , 1946 .

[9]  E. B. Skaggs Some critical comments on certain prevailing concepts and methods used in mental testing. , 2022 .

[10]  R. Thouless TEST UNRELIABILITY AND FUNCTION FLUCTUATION , 1936 .

[11]  A. Anastasi The influence of practice upon test reliability. , 1934 .

[12]  R. Wherry,et al.  The concept of test and item reliability in relation to factor pattern , 1943 .

[13]  C. L. Vaughn Factors in rat learning : an analysis of the intercorrelations between 34 variables , 1937 .

[14]  N. J. V. Steenberg Factors in the learning behavior of the albino rat , 1939 .

[15]  Lawrence G. Thomas,et al.  Mental tests as instruments of science. , 1942 .

[16]  H. Woodrow,et al.  The relation between abilities and improvement with practice. , 1938 .

[17]  H. Woodrow Factors in Improvement with Practice , 1939 .