Integrated modelling as an analytical and optimisation tool for urban watershed management.

In recent years numerical modelling has become a standard procedure to optimise urban wastewater systems design and operation. Since the models were developed for the subsystems independently, they did not support an integrated view to the operation of the sewer system, the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and the receiving water. After pointing out the benefits of an integrated approach and the possible synergy effects that may arise from analysing the interactions across the interfaces, three examples of modelling case studies carried out in Germany are introduced. With these examples we intend to demonstrate the potential of integrated models, though their development cannot be considered completed. They are set up with different combinations of self-developed and commercially available software. The aim is to analyse fluxes through the total wastewater system or to integrate pollution-based control in the upstream direction, that is e.g. managing the combined water retention tanks as a function of state variables in the WWTP or the receiving water. Furthermore the interface between the sewer and the WWTP can be optimised by predictive simulations such that the combined water flow can be maximised according to the time- and dynamics-dependent state of the treatment processes.

[1]  Wolfgang Schilling,et al.  Improved interception of combined sewage in the Trondheim-Høvringen wastewater system , 1999 .

[2]  M. C. Almeida Pollutant Transformation Processes in Sewers under Aerobic Dry Weather Flow Conditions , 2000 .

[3]  Peter Reichert,et al.  Concepts underlying a computer program for the identification and simulation of aquatic systems , 1994 .

[4]  J Alex,et al.  Pollution based real time control of wastewater systems. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  Poul Harremoës,et al.  Correlation of combined sewer overflow reduction due to real-time control and resulting effect on the oxygen concentration in the river , 1998 .

[6]  Poul Harremoës,et al.  The importance of the treatment plant performance during rain to acute water pollution , 1996 .

[7]  P Reichert River Water Quality Model no. 1 (RWQM1): case study II. Oxygen and nitrogen conversion processes in the River Glatt (Switzerland). , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  W. Gujer,et al.  Activated sludge model No. 3 , 1995 .

[9]  T Frehmann,et al.  Effects of real time control of sewer systems on treatment plant performance and receiving water quality. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  P. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Fast, simultaneous simulation of the integrated urban wastewater system using mechanistic surrogate models. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  Peter Krebs,et al.  Modelling the total ammonia impact of CSO and WWTP effluent on the receiving water , 1998 .

[12]  K Seggelke,et al.  Online-simulation of the WWTP to minimise the total emission of WWTP and sewer system. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.