Effects of Socioeconomic Context on Official Reaction to Juvenile Delinquency

This study uses survey data in conjunction with police and court records to examine the two-tiered effects of socioeconomic context on official police reaction to juvenile delinquency. The results suggest that neighborhood SES has an inverse effect on police contacts independent of actual law-violative behavior as measured by self-reported delinquency. On the other hand, individual SES has a negative influence on subsequent court referrals independent of both self-reported delinquency and police records. This general result holds for males as well as females, and persists despite controls for the prevalence, frequency and type of delinquency, race, family structure, delinquent peers, and gang membership. Discrepancies between self-reports of deviance and official records are thus not simply due to errors in measurement or different domains of behavior, but to structurally patterned sources of social control.

[1]  Mitchell B. Chamlin,et al.  Social Structure and Crime Control Among Macrosocial Units , 1984, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  G. Kleck.  On the use of self-report data to determine the class distribution of criminal and delinquent behavior , 1982 .

[3]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[4]  W. DuMouchel,et al.  Using Sample Survey Weights in Multiple Regression Analyses of Stratified Samples , 1983 .

[5]  Ronald A. Farrell,et al.  Normal Homicides and the Law , 1977 .

[6]  Douglas A. Smith.  The Organizational Context of Legal Control , 1984 .

[7]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Determinants of Juvenile Court Dispositions: Ascriptive and Achieved Factors in Two Metropolitan Courts , 1978 .

[8]  D. Dannefer,et al.  Race and Juvenile Justice Processing in Court and Police Agencies , 1982, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Delbert S. Elliott,et al.  Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency. , 1980 .

[10]  Lamar T. Empey.  American Delinquency: Its Meaning and Construction , 1978 .

[11]  Maynard L. Erickson,et al.  The Group Context of Delinquent Behavior , 1971 .

[12]  Richard E. Sykes,et al.  Police Control of Juveniles , 1978 .

[13]  R. A. Farrell,et al.  Prior Offense Record as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy , 1978 .

[14]  Michael J. Hindelang,et al.  Correlates of Delinquency: The Illusion of Discrepancy between Self-Report and Official Measures. , 1979 .

[15]  M. Morash.  Establishment of a Juvenile Police Record: The Influence of Individual and Peer Group Characteristics , 1984 .

[16]  T. Hirschi.  Causes of Delinquency. , 1970, British medical journal.

[17]  A. Liska,et al.  Theoretical Interpretations of Social Class and Racial Differentials in Legal Decision-Making for Juveniles* , 1979 .

[18]  A. Reiss,,et al.  Police control of juveniles. , 1970, American sociological review.

[19]  E. Schur.  Radical Nonintervention: Rethinking the Delinquency Problem , 1973 .

[20]  Dusten R. Hollist,et al.  Causes of Delinquency , 1950, Juvenile Justice.

[21]  T. P. Thornberry,et al.  Race, Socioeconomic Status and Sentencing in the Juvenile Justice System , 1973 .

[22]  Arthur L. Stinchcombe,et al.  Institutions of Privacy in the Determination of Police Administrative Practice , 1963, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  A Study of the Behavior of Law , 1979 .