Backward-facing step calculations using the shear improved Smagorinsky model

Recently a simple modification of the standard Smagorinsky model was proposed that takes into account the physics associated with strong shear in wall-bounded flows. After its initial proposal in Toschi et al. (2000) the model was first tested in Leveque et al. (2006) in the context of channel flow. Here we test its validity on the more complex backward-facing step geometry. We compare results against experimental data, DNS data, and results obtained with the dynamic model. The model gives accurate results, comparable with those achieved with the dynamic model, at the low Reynolds number of the computations. We identified several issues that should be addressed in order to broaden the applicability of the model to non-stationary flows.

[1]  R. A. Antonia,et al.  Progress in studying small-scale turbulence using ‘exact’ two-point equations , 2004 .

[2]  P. Moin,et al.  A dynamic subgrid‐scale model for compressible turbulence and scalar transport , 1991 .

[3]  Roberto Benzi,et al.  Scale-by-scale budget and similarity laws for shear turbulence , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  David M. Driver,et al.  Backward-facing step measurements at low Reynolds number, Re(sub h)=5000 , 1994 .

[5]  Liang Shao,et al.  A new dynamic subgrid eddy viscosity model with application to turbulent channel flow , 2004 .

[6]  U. Piomelli High Reynolds number calculations using the dynamic subgrid‐scale stress model , 1993 .

[7]  Caskey,et al.  GENERAL CIRCULATION EXPERIMENTS WITH THE PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS I . THE BASIC EXPERIMENT , 1962 .

[8]  L. Berselli,et al.  Mathematics of Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows , 2005 .

[9]  Lévêque,et al.  Shear effects in nonhomogeneous turbulence , 2000, Physical review letters.

[10]  F. Toschi,et al.  Shear-improved Smagorinsky model for large-eddy simulation of wall-bounded turbulent flows , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Roberto Benzi,et al.  Intermittency and Structure Functions in Channel Flow Turbulence , 1998, chao-dyn/9807027.

[12]  J. Ferziger,et al.  Evaluation of subgrid-scale models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow , 1979, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  P. Moin,et al.  A dynamic model for subgrid-scale variance and dissipation rate of a conserved scalar , 1998 .

[14]  P. Moin,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Marcel Lesieur,et al.  Turbulence in fluids , 1990 .

[16]  F. Toschi,et al.  Intermittency and scaling laws for wall bounded turbulence , 1998, chao-dyn/9812009.

[17]  D. Lilly,et al.  A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid‐scale closure method , 1992 .

[18]  M. Kopera Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step , 2011 .

[19]  S. Ciliberto,et al.  Scaling properties of the streamwise component of velocity in a turbulent boundary layer , 2000 .

[20]  R. Kraichnan Eddy Viscosity in Two and Three Dimensions , 1976 .

[21]  Victor Montagud-Camps Turbulence , 2019, Turbulent Heating and Anisotropy in the Solar Wind.

[22]  N. Kasagi,et al.  Three-dimensional particle-tracking velocimetry measurement of turbulence statistics and energy budget in a backward-facing step flow , 1995 .

[23]  C. Meneveau,et al.  Evolution and modelling of subgrid scales during rapid straining of turbulence , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Erratum: ‘‘A dynamic subgrid‐scale eddy viscosity model’’ [Phys. Fluids A 3, 1760 (1991)] , 1991 .

[25]  R. Benzi,et al.  Scaling laws and intermittency in homogeneous shear flow , 2000, nlin/0011040.

[26]  P. Sagaut BOOK REVIEW: Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows. An Introduction , 2001 .

[27]  U. Schumann Subgrid Scale Model for Finite Difference Simulations of Turbulent Flows in Plane Channels and Annuli , 1975 .

[28]  C. Pierce,et al.  Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion , 2001 .