Systems engineering analysis of aplanatic Wolter type I x-ray telescopes

It is well known that normal-incidence aplanatic telescope de- signs perform better at small field angles than ones corrected only for spherical aberration. This is why most large astronomical telescopes fab- ricated in the past fifty years have been of the Ritchey-Chretien (aplanatic) design rather than of the classical Cassegrain design. For the relatively new field of x-ray astronomy, the Wolter type I grazing inci- dence design has been extensively utilized. It consists of a paraboloidal primary mirror coaxial with a confocal hyperboloidal secondary mirror. Aplanatic versions of the Wolter type I grazing incidence x-ray telescope have been discussed in detail in the literature, and are widely touted as being superior designs. However, scattering effects from residual optical fabrication errors and other practical engineering error sources prevent these grazing-incidence telescopes from being near diffraction-limited (even on axis) at the very short operational x-ray wavelengths. A sys- tems engineering analysis of these error sources indicates that they will dominate coma at the small field angles, and of course astigmatism, field curvature, and higher-order aberrations dominate coma at the large field angles. Hence, there is little improvement in performance when going to an aplanatic design. Comparison of performance predictions for the clas- sical versus aplanatic Wolter type I x-ray telescope are presented for the special case of the Solar X-Ray Imager (SXI) baseline design. SXI is expected to become a standard subsystem aboard the next generation of NOAA/GOES weather satellites. © 2000 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumen- tation Engineers. (S0091-3286(00)01606-8)

[1]  James E. Harvey.  Diffraction effects in grazing incidence x-ray telescopes. , 1991 .

[2]  J. E. Harvey,et al.  Transfer function characterization of grazing incidence optical systems. , 1988, Applied optics.

[3]  Eugene L. Church,et al.  Role Of Surface Topography In X-Ray Scattering , 1979, Other Conferences.

[4]  H. F. Tschunko,et al.  Imaging performance of annular apertures. , 1974, Applied optics.

[5]  M. Szilagyi.  The Theory of Aberrations , 1988 .

[6]  K. Nariai,et al.  Geometric aberration of a generalized Wolter type I telescope. 2: Analytical study. , 1988, Applied optics.

[7]  R. Chase,et al.  Design Parameters of Paraboloid-Hyperboloid Telescopes for X-ray Astronomy. , 1972, Applied optics.

[8]  H. Wolter.  Spiegelsysteme streifenden Einfalls als abbildende Optiken für Röntgenstrahlen , 1952 .

[9]  Raymond N. Wilson.  Reflecting Telescope Optics I , 1996 .

[10]  David L. Shealy,et al.  Astronomical Applications Of Grazing Incidence Telescopes With Polynomial Surfaces , 1979, Other Conferences.

[11]  Hans Wolter,et al.  Verallgemeinerte Schwarzschildsche Spiegelsysteme streifender Reflexion als Optiken für Röntgenstrahlen , 1952 .

[12]  J. E. Harvey,et al.  Performance predictions of a Schwarzschild imaging microscope for soft x-ray applications , 1996 .

[13]  T T Saha,et al.  Transverse ray aberrations for paraboloid-hyperboloid telescopes. , 1985, Applied optics.

[14]  James E. Harvey,et al.  Light-Scattering Characteristics Of Optical Surfaces , 1977, Other Conferences.

[15]  P. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Formation of optical images by X-rays. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  James E. Harvey.  Scattering effects in x-ray imaging systems , 1995, Optics & Photonics.

[17]  R. J. Noll,et al.  Optical Surface Analysis Code (OSAC) , 1983, Optics & Photonics.

[18]  W. Werner,et al.  Imaging properties of Wolter I type x-ray telescopes. , 1977, Applied optics.

[19]  T T Saha,et al.  General surface equations for glancing incidence telescopes. , 1987, Applied optics.

[20]  Richard Grubb,et al.  GOES solar x-ray imager: overview and operational goals , 1996, Optics & Photonics.

[21]  Timo T. Saha.  Transverse Ray Aberrations Of Wolter Type 1 Telescopes , 1986, Other Conferences.

[22]  James E. Harvey.  Surface Scatter Phenomena: A Linear, Shift-Invariant Process , 1990, Optics & Photonics.

[23]  V. Mahajan.  Optical Imaging and Aberrations , 1998 .

[24]  Jack D. Gaskill,et al.  Linear systems, fourier transforms, and optics , 1978, Wiley series in pure and applied optics.

[25]  H. Hopkins,et al.  Wave theory of aberrations , 1950 .

[26]  Asher Peres,et al.  Gravitational radiation damping of nongravitational motion , 1960 .

[27]  P. Hall.  Introduction to Surface Roughness and Scattering , 1989 .

[28]  K. Nariai,et al.  Geometrical aberration of a generalized Wolter type I telescope. , 1987, Applied optics.

[29]  E. Church.  Small-angle scattering from smooth surfaces (A) , 1980 .

[30]  Peter Z. Takacs,et al.  Specification of the surface figure and finish of optical elements in terms of system performance , 1993, Optical Systems Design.

[31]  J. Stover.  Optical Scattering: Measurement and Analysis , 1990 .

[32]  H. C. King,et al.  Book Review: STARGAZER: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF THE TELESCOPE / Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW, 2004 , 2006 .

[33]  L. Mertz.  X-ray Telescopes , 1996 .

[34]  D Korsch,et al.  Primary aberrations for grazing incidence. , 1977, Applied optics.

[35]  P. Beckmann,et al.  The scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces , 1963 .

[36]  一岡 芳樹,et al.  J. D. Gaskill: Linear Systems, Fourier Transforms, and Optics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978, xiv+554ページ, 23.5×15.5cm, $24.96 (Wiley Sons in Pure and Applied Optics). , 1979 .

[37]  E. L. Church.  Interpretation Of High-Resolution X-Ray Scattering Measurements , 1981, Other Conferences.

[38]  E. Church.  Fractal surface finish. , 1988, Applied optics.

[39]  T T Saha.  Aberrations for grazing incidence telescopes. , 1988, Applied optics.

[40]  P Glenn,et al.  Performance prediction of the AXAF Technology Mirror Assembly using measured mirror surface errors. , 1988, Applied optics.

[41]  R. Chase,et al.  Wolter-schwarzschild telescopes for x-ray astronomy. , 1973, Applied optics.