Looking back on the current day: interruptibility prediction using daily behavioral features

When a person seeks another person's attention, it is of prime importance to assess how interruptible the other person is. Since smartphones are ubiquitously used as communication media these days, interruptibility prediction on smartphones has started to attract great interest from both academia and industry. Previous studies, in general, attempted to model interruptibility using the behaviors at the current moment and in the immediate past (e.g., 5 minutes before). However, a person's interruptibility at a certain moment is indeed affected by his/her preceding behaviors for several reasons. Motivated by this long-term effect, in this paper we propose a novel methodology of extracting features based on past behaviors from smartphone sensor data. The primary difference from previous studies is that we systematically consider a longer history of up to a day in addition to the current point and the immediate past. To represent behaviors in a day accurately and compactly, our methodology divides a day into multiple timeslots and then, for each timeslot, derives relevant features such as the temporal shapes of the time series of the sensor data. In order to verify the advantage of our methodology, we collected a data set of smartphone usage from 25 participants for four weeks and obtained a license to a large-scale public data set constructed from 907 users over approximately nine months. The experimental results on the two data sets show that looking back to the beginning of the current day improves prediction accuracy by up to 16% and 7%, respectively, compared with the baseline and state-of-the-art methods.

[1]  Katarzyna Wac,et al.  Getting closer: an empirical investigation of the proximity of user to their smart phones , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[2]  Divyakant Agrawal,et al.  A comparison of DFT and DWT based similarity search in time-series databases , 2000, CIKM '00.

[3]  Bernard Guerin How to Rethink Psychology: New metaphors for understanding people and their behavior , 2015 .

[4]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  Anticipatory Mobile Computing , 2013, ACM Comput. Surv..

[5]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  InterruptMe: designing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive applications , 2014, UbiComp.

[6]  Martin Pielot,et al.  Large-scale evaluation of call-availability prediction , 2014, UbiComp.

[7]  Usama M. Fayyad,et al.  Multi-Interval Discretization of Continuous-Valued Attributes for Classification Learning , 1993, IJCAI.

[8]  Martin Pielot,et al.  Didn't you see my message?: predicting attentiveness to mobile instant messages , 2014, CHI.

[9]  Eileen A. Hogan The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business , 2001 .

[10]  Joyce Ho,et al.  Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices , 2005, CHI.

[11]  Stuart M. Allen,et al.  Interruptibility prediction for ubiquitous systems: conventions and new directions from a growing field , 2015, UbiComp.

[12]  P. Terry,et al.  Distinctions between emotion and mood , 2005 .

[13]  Jonna Häkkilä,et al.  The phone rings but the user doesn't answer: unavailability in mobile communication , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[14]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  A model for human interruptability: experimental evaluation and automatic estimation from wearable sensors , 2004, Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[15]  Mark A. Hall,et al.  Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning , 2003 .

[16]  Jae-Gil Lee,et al.  Glaucus: Exploiting the Wisdom of Crowds for Location-Based Queries in Mobile Environments , 2014, ICWSM.

[17]  Alastair R. Beresford,et al.  Device Analyzer: Understanding Smartphone Usage , 2013, MobiQuitous.

[18]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Learning and reasoning about interruption , 2003, ICMI '03.

[19]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study , 2003, CHI '03.

[20]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors , 2005, TCHI.

[21]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility , 2010, Science.

[22]  Kentaro Fujita,et al.  Self-regulation of health behavior: social psychological approaches to goal setting and goal striving. , 2013, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[23]  Moushumi Sharmin,et al.  Assessing the availability of users to engage in just-in-time intervention in the natural environment , 2014, UbiComp.

[24]  George Karabatis,et al.  Discrete wavelet transform-based time series analysis and mining , 2011, CSUR.

[25]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  BusyBody: creating and fielding personalized models of the cost of interruption , 2004, CSCW.

[26]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  Designing content-driven intelligent notification mechanisms for mobile applications , 2015, UbiComp.

[27]  E. J. Stollnitz,et al.  Wavelets for Computer Graphics: A Primer Part 2 , 1995 .

[28]  Saeed Moghaddam,et al.  MobileMiner: mining your frequent patterns on your phone , 2014, UbiComp.

[29]  C. Burrus,et al.  Introduction to Wavelets and Wavelet Transforms: A Primer , 1997 .

[30]  Martin Pielot,et al.  When attention is not scarce - detecting boredom from mobile phone usage , 2015, UbiComp.

[31]  Jin-Hyuk Hong,et al.  Understanding and prediction of mobile application usage for smart phones , 2012, UbiComp.

[32]  Tadashi Okoshi,et al.  Reducing users' perceived mental effort due to interruptive notifications in multi-device mobile environments , 2015, UbiComp.

[33]  David Salesin,et al.  Wavelets for computer graphics: a primer.1 , 1995, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.