Two-dimensional distribution of relaxation time and water content from surface nuclear magnetic resonance

Development in instrumentation and data analysis of surface nuclear magnetic resonance has recently moved on from one-dimensional (1D) soundings to two-dimensional (2D) surveys, opening the method to a larger field of hydrological applications. Current analysis of 2D data sets, however, does not incorporate relaxation times and is therefore restricted to the water content distribution in the subsurface. We present a robust 2D inversion scheme, based on the qt approach, which jointly inverts for water content and relaxation time by taking the complete data set into account. The spatial distribution of relaxation time yields structural information of the subsurface and allows for additional petrophysical characterization. The presented scheme handles separated loop configurations for increased lateral resolution. Assuming a mono-exponential relaxation in each model cell, using irregular meshes, and gate-integrating the signal, the size of the inverse problem is significantly reduced and can be handled on a standard personal computer. A synthetic study shows that contrasts in both the quantities – water content and relaxation time – can be imaged. Inversion of a field data set outlines a buried glacial valley and allows the distinguishing of two aquifers with different grain sizes, which can be concisely interpreted together with a resistivity profile. The impact of the anisotropic weighting factor and subsurface resistivity on the inversion result are shown and discussed. A comparison of the results obtained by the previously used initial value and time-step inversion approaches illustrates the improved stability and resolution capabilities of the 2D qt inversion scheme.

[1]  Stewart A. Greenhalgh,et al.  Three-Dimensional Magnetic Field and NMR Sensitivity Computations Incorporating Conductivity Anomalies and Variable-Surface Topography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Jean-Michel Vouillamoz,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Sounding Applied to Aquifer Characterization , 2004, Ground water.

[3]  Peter B. Weichman,et al.  Surface Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Large Systems , 1999 .

[4]  Thomas Günther,et al.  Hydraulic properties at the North Sea island of Borkum derived from joint inversion of magnetic resonance and electrical resistivity soundings , 2012 .

[5]  A. Green,et al.  Estimating the longitudinal relaxation time T1 in surface NMR , 2011 .

[6]  David O. Walsh,et al.  Practical limitations and applications of short dead time surface NMR , 2011 .

[7]  W. E. Kenyon,et al.  A Three-Part Study of NMR Longitudinal Relaxation Properties of Water-Saturated Sandstones , 1988 .

[8]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  QT inversion — Comprehensive use of the complete surface NMR data set , 2010 .

[9]  Weichman,et al.  Theory of surface nuclear magnetic resonance with applications to geophysical imaging problems , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[10]  Jean-Michel Baltassat,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists , 2002 .

[11]  Rosemary Knight,et al.  The effect of pore size and magnetic susceptibility on the surface NMR relaxation parameter T 2 , 2011 .

[12]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  Magnetic resonance soundings with separated transmitter and receiver loops , 2005 .

[13]  Thomas Günther,et al.  Assessment of the potential of a new generation of surface nuclear magnetic resonance instruments , 2011 .

[14]  Niklas Linde,et al.  3D crosshole ERT for aquifer characterization and monitoring of infiltrating river water , 2011 .

[15]  Anatoly Legchenko,et al.  Inversion of surface NMR data , 1998 .

[16]  Esben Auken,et al.  Efficient full decay inversion of MRS data with a stretched-exponential approximation of the T2* distribution , 2012 .

[17]  J. Roy,et al.  Application of the magnetic resonance sounding method to the investigation of aquifers in the presence of magnetic materials , 2010 .

[18]  T. Günther,et al.  Improved prediction of hydraulic conductivity for coarse-grained, unconsolidated material from nuclear magnetic resonance , 2013 .

[19]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Accounting for relaxation processes during the pulse in surface NMR data , 2009 .

[20]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  Pore size distributions and hydraulic conductivities of rocks derived from Magnetic Resonance Sounding relaxation data using multi-exponential decay time inversion , 2008 .

[21]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  Inversion of resistivity in Magnetic Resonance Sounding , 2008 .

[22]  Alan G. Green,et al.  High-resolution surface NMR tomography of shallow aquifers based on multioffset measurements , 2009 .

[23]  David O. Walsh,et al.  Multi-channel surface NMR instrumentation and software for 1D/2D groundwater investigations , 2008 .

[24]  Thomas Günther,et al.  Surface Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Tomography , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Off-resonance effects in surface nuclear magnetic resonance , 2011 .

[26]  Jean-François Girard,et al.  2D magnetic resonance tomography applied to karstic conduit imaging , 2007 .

[27]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  Study on complex inversion of magnetic resonance sounding signals , 2005 .

[28]  R. A. James,et al.  Core‐Based Investigation of NMR Logging as a Tool for Characterization of Shallow Unconsolidated Aquifers , 1999 .

[29]  Anatoly Legchenko,et al.  A review of the basic principles for proton magnetic resonance sounding measurements , 2002 .

[30]  K. Brownstein,et al.  Importance of classical diffusion in NMR studies of water in biological cells , 1979 .

[31]  Per-Olof Persson,et al.  A Simple Mesh Generator in MATLAB , 2004, SIAM Rev..

[32]  Peter B. Weichman,et al.  Study of surface nuclear magnetic resonance inverse problems , 2002 .