Dynamic quality and change management for large scale concurrent design and construction projects

Though concurrent design and construction has been lauded for reducing the time of the total processes, such an approach may make projects more uncertain and complex than those where a sequential design and construction process is used. The main sources of risk are iterative cycles that result from errors and changes introduced during the execution of concurrent design and construction. Such cycles create subsequent impacts on the project performance. In addition, traditional network scheduling tools are not adequate to deal with problems encountered during concurrent design and construction because they consider the project only as a combination of discrete activities and ignore dynamic interactions between different activities. In this context, Dynamic Planning and control Methodology (DPM), a simulation-based planning and control tool, was developed to help prepare a robust construction plan that would avoid these uncertainties. However, DPM focuses only on iterative cycles caused by quality problems in construction, and it lacks the capability to deal with change cycles. In order to address this issue, this paper proposes a framework for quality and change management and a new generation of DPM based on this framework. The new DPM incorporates the traditional network tools and buffering strategies into system dynamics simulation models and aims to capture iterative cycles and their impact on design and construction performance in advance. Generated policy guidelines and analysis by the new DPM show comprehensive project profiles and help avoid unnecessary redundant subsequent actions. In addition, uncertainties of complex concurrent projects can be reduced by the buffering strategy of the new DPM. Finally, a case study of a bridge project demonstrates that DPM can help prepare robust and systemic planning for concurrent design and construction in the real world setting, and DPM allows managers or site engineers to analyze the unpredictable incidents that may occur during concurrent design and construction and to anticipate their impacts on project performance. Thesis Supervisor: Feniosky Pefia-Mora Title: Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering

[1]  John Bowers,et al.  System dynamics in project management: a comparative analysis with traditional methods , 1996 .

[2]  R. Peacock Distributed architecture technologies , 2000 .

[3]  Michael In-Chiang Li A robust planning and control methodology for design-build fast-track civil engineering and architectural projects , 1999 .

[4]  Awad S. Hanna,et al.  Quantitative Definition of Projects Impacted by Change Orders , 2002 .

[5]  Nabil Kartam,et al.  Making Effective Use of Construction Lessons Learned in Project Life Cycle , 1996 .

[6]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Business dynamics : systems thinking and modelling for acomplex world , 2002 .

[7]  Rogelio Oliva Pue,et al.  A dynamic theory of service delivery : implications for managing service quality , 1996 .

[8]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics Modeling for Project Management , 1992 .

[9]  Moonseo Park Dynamic planning and control methodology for large-scale concurrent construction projects , 2001 .

[10]  W. M. Ng,et al.  SIMULATION MODELING AND MANAGEMENT OF LARGE BASEMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECT , 1998 .

[11]  Frederick E. Gould Managing the Construction Process: Estimating, Scheduling, and Project Control , 1996 .

[12]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Influence of Project Type and Procurement Method on Rework Costs in Building Construction Projects , 2002 .

[13]  Khaled A El-Rayes,et al.  Optimizing Resource Utilization for Repetitive Construction Projects , 2001 .

[14]  David N. Ford,et al.  Dynamic modeling of product development processes , 1998 .

[15]  Claude Bédard,et al.  Collaborative planning and scheduling of interrelated design changes , 2000 .

[16]  C. William Ibbs Quantitative Impacts of Project Change: Size Issues , 1997 .

[17]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  MULTIPLE DEVICE COLLABORATIVE AND REAL TIME ANALYSIS SYSTEM FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN CIVIL ENGINEERING , 2002 .

[18]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[19]  George P. Richardson Introduction to the system dynamics review , 1985 .

[20]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Prediction of Construction Disputes in Change Issues , 2000 .