Integrating the disaster cycle model into traditional disaster diplomacy concepts.

Disaster diplomacy is an evolving contemporary model that examines how disaster response strategies can facilitate cooperation between parties in conflict. The concept of disaster diplomacy has emerged during the past decade to address how disaster response can be leveraged to promote peace, facilitate communication, promote human rights, and strengthen intercommunity ties in the increasingly multipolar modern world. Historically, the concept has evolved through two camps, one that focuses on the interactions between national governments in conflict and another that emphasizes the grassroots movements that can promote change. The two divergent approaches can be reconciled and disaster diplomacy further matured by contextualizing the concept within the disaster cycle, a model well established within the disaster risk management community. In particular, access to available health care, especially for the most vulnerable populations, may need to be negotiated. As such, disaster response professionals, including emergency medicine specialists, can play an important role in the development and implementation of disaster diplomacy concepts.

[1]  Jennifer Leaning,et al.  The Dilemma of Neutrality , 2007, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[2]  M. Glantz Climate‐related disaster diplomacy: A US‐Cuban case study , 2000 .

[3]  I. Kickbusch,et al.  Global health diplomacy: training across disciplines. , 2007, World hospitals and health services : the official journal of the International Hospital Federation.

[4]  J C Gaydos,et al.  Military participation in emergency humanitarian assistance. , 1994, Disasters.

[5]  G. Macqueen,et al.  Peace building through health initiatives , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Health and peace: time for a new discipline , 2001, The Lancet.

[7]  H. Chochinov Vicarious grief and response to global disasters , 2005, The Lancet.

[8]  Erik J Reaves,et al.  Implementation of evidence-based humanitarian programs in military-led missions: part I. Qualitative gap analysis of current military and international aid programs. , 2008, Disaster medicine and public health preparedness.

[9]  I. Kelman Acting on Disaster Diplomacy , 2006 .

[10]  G. Whiteman,et al.  Exploring the Geography of Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response: A Study of Fortune Global 500 Firms , 2009 .

[11]  C. Buhmann The role of health professionals in preventing and mediating conflict , 2005, Medicine, conflict, and survival.

[12]  Erik J Reaves,et al.  Implementation of Evidence-based Humanitarian Programs in Military-led Missions: Part II. The Impact Assessment Model , 2008, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.

[13]  G. Ciottone,et al.  Disaster Diplomacy: Current Controversies and Future Prospects , 2009, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[14]  Bruce Hoffman,et al.  Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in Iraq , 2006 .

[15]  C. Llewellyn,et al.  Toward more effective humanitarian assistance. , 2004, Military medicine.

[16]  Chas W. Freeman The Diplomat's Dictionary , 1997 .

[17]  Andy Haines,et al.  Health effects of climate change. , 2004, JAMA.

[18]  M. Vanrooyen,et al.  Health and Disaster Diplomacy in North Korea: Ensuring Access and Accountability in Complex Political Environments , 2009, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[19]  T. Schrecker,et al.  Globalisation and health: the need for a global vision , 2008, The Lancet.