Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: new evidence from dual-task experiments.

Three dual-task experiments investigated the capacity demands of phoneme selection in picture naming. On each trial, participants named a target picture (Task 1) and carried out a tone discrimination task (Task 2). To vary the time required for phoneme selection, the authors combined the targets with phonologically related or unrelated distractor pictures (Experiment 1) or words, which were clearly visible (Experiment 2) or masked (Experiment 3). When pictures or masked words were presented, the tone discrimination and picture naming latencies were shorter in the related condition than in the unrelated condition, which indicates that phoneme selection requires central processing capacity. However, when the distractor words were clearly visible, the facilitatory effect was confined to the picture naming latencies. This pattern arose because the visible related distractor words facilitated phoneme selection but slowed down speech monitoring processes that had to be completed before the response to the tone could be selected.

[1]  B. Rapp,et al.  Speaking words: Contributions of cognitive neuropsychological research , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[2]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  R. Remington,et al.  The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Albert Costa,et al.  Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access , 2005 .

[5]  A. Postma Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models , 2000, Cognition.

[6]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .

[7]  H. Pashler The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .

[8]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[9]  Elizabeth R. Blacfkmer,et al.  Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs in spontaneous speech , 1991, Cognition.

[10]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? , 2003 .

[11]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[14]  G. Dell,et al.  Models of Impaired Lexical Access in Speech Production , 2000 .

[15]  Niels O. Schiller,et al.  Masked Syllable Priming of English Nouns , 1999, Brain and Language.

[16]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production , 2003 .

[17]  W. Levelt Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[18]  C. Osgood,et al.  Hesitation Phenomena in Spontaneous English Speech , 1959 .

[19]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Telling time from analog and digital clocks: a multiple-route account. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[20]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .

[21]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Spoken language planning and the initiation of articulation , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  A. Welford THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[23]  C. W. Telford The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses , 1931 .

[24]  Frank Wijnen,et al.  Phonological Encoding and Monitoring in Normal and Pathological Speech , 2005 .

[25]  Antje S Meyer,et al.  Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[26]  R. Frost Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998 .

[27]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[28]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[29]  Niels O. Schiller,et al.  The effect of visually masked syllable primes on the naming latencies of words and pictures , 1998 .

[30]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .

[31]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). , 2004, Psychological review.

[32]  Roger W. Remington,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for two Types of Attention , 1995 .

[33]  D. Kahneman Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[34]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Now You See it, Now you Don't: On Turning Semantic Interference Into Facilitation in a Stroop-Like Task , 2006, Cortex.

[35]  W. Levelt,et al.  Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production , 1998, Cognition.

[36]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding , 2001, Cognition.

[37]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from dual-task methodologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Lexical Selection is Not a Competitive Process: A Reply to La Heij et al. (2006) , 2006, Cortex.

[39]  A. Caramazza How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[40]  W. Levelt,et al.  Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995) , 1996 .

[41]  B. Rapp,et al.  Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. , 2000, Psychological review.

[42]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Attention and Gaze Control in Picture Naming, Word Reading, and Word Categorizing. , 2007 .

[43]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  The Effects of Speech Production and Speech Comprehension on Simulated Driving Performance , 2006 .

[44]  Robert J Hartsuiker,et al.  Semantic and phonological context effects in speech error repair. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[48]  Sieb G. Nooteboom,et al.  Listening to oneself: Monitoring speech production : Abstract , 2005 .

[49]  R W Remington,et al.  A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  Peter McLeod,et al.  Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period , 1977 .

[51]  Z. Griffin Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[52]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. , 1995 .

[53]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities , 2003, Phonetica.

[54]  K. Rastle,et al.  Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Speech Planning during Multiple-object Naming: Effects of Ageing , 2022 .

[56]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked Priming of Word and Picture Naming: The Role of Syllabic Units ☆ , 1996 .

[57]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[58]  Frieda Goldman Eisler Psycholinguistics : experiments in spontaneous speech , 1968 .

[59]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Constraint, Word Frequency, and the Relationship between Lexical Processing Levels in Spoken Word Production , 1998 .

[60]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Halting in Single Word Production: A Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory of Speech Monitoring. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[61]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[62]  R. Peereman,et al.  Inhibitory priming effects in auditory word recognition: when the target's competitors conflict with the prime word , 2003, Cognition.

[63]  Albert Postma,et al.  Limitations in processing resources and speech monitoring , 2002 .

[64]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[65]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[66]  H. Pashler,et al.  Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[67]  A. Meyer,et al.  Word form retrieval in language production , 2007 .

[68]  P. Starreveld,et al.  Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. , 1996 .

[69]  A. Paivio,et al.  Cognitive components of picture naming. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[70]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Use of word length information in utterance planning , 2007 .

[71]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Repeating Words in Spontaneous Speech , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[72]  A. Meyer,et al.  Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[73]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[74]  A. T. Welford,et al.  Evidence of a Single-Channel Decision Mechanism Limiting Performance in a Serial Reaction Task* , 1959 .

[75]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[76]  D. Navon,et al.  Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[77]  G. Dell,et al.  Language production and serial order: a functional analysis and a model. , 1997, Psychological review.

[78]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[79]  Heike Martensen,et al.  The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesn’t fly: Related beply to Baars et al. (1975) ☆ , 2005 .

[80]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.

[81]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction , 2007 .

[82]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[83]  E. Saffran,et al.  Contrasting effects of phonological priming in aphasic word production , 2005, Cognition.

[84]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[85]  J. McQueen,et al.  Cleaving automatic processes from strategic biases in phonological priming , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[86]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[87]  Wido La Heij,et al.  In Defense of the Lexical-Competition Account of Picture-Word Interference: A Comment On Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006) , 2006, Cortex.

[88]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: evidence from the `tip-of-the-tongue' phenomenon , 1997, Cognition.

[89]  Peter A. Starreveld,et al.  On the Interpretation of Onsets of Auditory Context Effects in Word Production , 2000 .

[90]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[91]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion , 2003 .

[92]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[93]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Spoken word planning, comprehending, and self-monitoring: Evaluation of WEAVER++ , 2005 .