Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: new evidence from dual-task experiments.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Rapp,et al. Speaking words: Contributions of cognitive neuropsychological research , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[2] Michael S Vitevitch,et al. The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[3] R. Remington,et al. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[4] Albert Costa,et al. Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access , 2005 .
[5] A. Postma. Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models , 2000, Cognition.
[6] J. C. Johnston,et al. Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .
[7] H. Pashler. The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .
[8] B. J. Winer. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .
[9] Elizabeth R. Blacfkmer,et al. Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs in spontaneous speech , 1991, Cognition.
[10] Gary S. Dell,et al. Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? , 2003 .
[11] Pierre Jolicoeur,et al. Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[12] Michele Miozzo,et al. Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[13] B. Fischhoff,et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .
[14] G. Dell,et al. Models of Impaired Lexical Access in Speech Production , 2000 .
[15] Niels O. Schiller,et al. Masked Syllable Priming of English Nouns , 1999, Brain and Language.
[16] Wido La Heij,et al. Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production , 2003 .
[17] W. Levelt. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .
[18] C. Osgood,et al. Hesitation Phenomena in Spontaneous English Speech , 1959 .
[19] Ardi Roelofs,et al. Telling time from analog and digital clocks: a multiple-route account. , 2007, Experimental psychology.
[20] Kathryn Bock,et al. Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .
[21] A. Roelofs,et al. Spoken language planning and the initiation of articulation , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[22] A. Welford. THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .
[23] C. W. Telford. The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses , 1931 .
[24] Frank Wijnen,et al. Phonological Encoding and Monitoring in Normal and Pathological Speech , 2005 .
[25] Antje S Meyer,et al. Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[26] R. Frost. Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998 .
[27] G S Dell,et al. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.
[28] A. Roelofs,et al. The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.
[29] Niels O. Schiller,et al. The effect of visually masked syllable primes on the naming latencies of words and pictures , 1998 .
[30] H. Schriefers,et al. Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .
[31] A. Roelofs,et al. Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). , 2004, Psychological review.
[32] Roger W. Remington,et al. Chronometric Evidence for two Types of Attention , 1995 .
[33] D. Kahneman. Attention and Effort , 1973 .
[34] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. Now You See it, Now you Don't: On Turning Semantic Interference Into Facilitation in a Stroop-Like Task , 2006, Cortex.
[35] W. Levelt,et al. Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production , 1998, Cognition.
[36] Zenzi M. Griffin,et al. Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding , 2001, Cognition.
[37] Alexandra A. Cleland,et al. Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from dual-task methodologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[38] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. Lexical Selection is Not a Competitive Process: A Reply to La Heij et al. (2006) , 2006, Cortex.
[39] A. Caramazza. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .
[40] W. Levelt,et al. Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995) , 1996 .
[41] B. Rapp,et al. Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. , 2000, Psychological review.
[42] Ardi Roelofs,et al. Attention and Gaze Control in Picture Naming, Word Reading, and Word Categorizing. , 2007 .
[43] Arthur F. Kramer,et al. The Effects of Speech Production and Speech Comprehension on Simulated Driving Performance , 2006 .
[44] Robert J Hartsuiker,et al. Semantic and phonological context effects in speech error repair. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[45] R. Hartsuiker,et al. The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.
[46] Bradford Z. Mahon,et al. Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[47] Willem J. M. Levelt,et al. A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[48] Sieb G. Nooteboom,et al. Listening to oneself: Monitoring speech production : Abstract , 2005 .
[49] R W Remington,et al. A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[50] Peter McLeod,et al. Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period , 1977 .
[51] Z. Griffin. Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .
[52] Wido La Heij,et al. Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. , 1995 .
[53] Antje S. Meyer,et al. Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities , 2003, Phonetica.
[54] K. Rastle,et al. Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[55] Antje S. Meyer,et al. Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Speech Planning during Multiple-object Naming: Effects of Ageing , 2022 .
[56] J. Grainger,et al. Masked Priming of Word and Picture Naming: The Role of Syllabic Units ☆ , 1996 .
[57] A. Roelofs,et al. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.
[58] Frieda Goldman Eisler. Psycholinguistics : experiments in spontaneous speech , 1968 .
[59] Zenzi M. Griffin,et al. Constraint, Word Frequency, and the Relationship between Lexical Processing Levels in Spoken Word Production , 1998 .
[60] V. Ferreira,et al. Halting in Single Word Production: A Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory of Speech Monitoring. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.
[61] Markus F Damian,et al. Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[62] R. Peereman,et al. Inhibitory priming effects in auditory word recognition: when the target's competitors conflict with the prime word , 2003, Cognition.
[63] Albert Postma,et al. Limitations in processing resources and speech monitoring , 2002 .
[64] P. Jolicoeur,et al. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[65] H. Pashler. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.
[66] H. Pashler,et al. Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[67] A. Meyer,et al. Word form retrieval in language production , 2007 .
[68] P. Starreveld,et al. Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. , 1996 .
[69] A. Paivio,et al. Cognitive components of picture naming. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.
[70] Antje S. Meyer,et al. Use of word length information in utterance planning , 2007 .
[71] H. H. Clark,et al. Repeating Words in Spontaneous Speech , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.
[72] A. Meyer,et al. Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[73] David E. Kieras,et al. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .
[74] A. T. Welford,et al. Evidence of a Single-Channel Decision Mechanism Limiting Performance in a Serial Reaction Task* , 1959 .
[75] V. Ferreira,et al. Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[76] D. Navon,et al. Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.
[77] G. Dell,et al. Language production and serial order: a functional analysis and a model. , 1997, Psychological review.
[78] D E Kieras,et al. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.
[79] Heike Martensen,et al. The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesn’t fly: Related beply to Baars et al. (1975) ☆ , 2005 .
[80] Jennifer M. Glass,et al. Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.
[81] D. Strayer,et al. Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction , 2007 .
[82] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.
[83] E. Saffran,et al. Contrasting effects of phonological priming in aphasic word production , 2005, Cognition.
[84] Randi C. Martin,et al. Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[85] J. McQueen,et al. Cleaving automatic processes from strategic biases in phonological priming , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[86] H Pashler,et al. Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[87] Wido La Heij,et al. In Defense of the Lexical-Competition Account of Picture-Word Interference: A Comment On Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006) , 2006, Cortex.
[88] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: evidence from the `tip-of-the-tongue' phenomenon , 1997, Cognition.
[89] Peter A. Starreveld,et al. On the Interpretation of Onsets of Auditory Context Effects in Word Production , 2000 .
[90] J. G. Snodgrass,et al. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.
[91] Antje S. Meyer,et al. Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion , 2003 .
[92] Antje S. Meyer,et al. Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .
[93] Ardi Roelofs,et al. Spoken word planning, comprehending, and self-monitoring: Evaluation of WEAVER++ , 2005 .