The whole and its parts: On the coherence theorem of Balinski and Young

A new proof of the Coherence Theorem of Balinski and Young is presented. The theorem elucidates the methods used to apportion parliamentary seats among political parties proportionately to their vote counts, or among geographical districts proportionately to their population figures. A proportional apportionment method is coherent when each seat apportionment among all claimants is such that every part of it is a valid solution for the subset of claimants concerned. The Coherence Theorem states that every coherent apportionment method is compatible with a divisor method.

[1]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Equity - in theory and practice , 1994 .

[2]  Michel Balinski,et al.  Parametric vs. divisor methods of apportionment , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  Michel Balinski,et al.  Parametric methods of apportionment, rounding and production , 1999 .

[4]  H P Young,et al.  The Webster method of apportionment. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Michel Balinski,et al.  Stability, Coalitions and Schisms in Proportional Representation Systems , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[6]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote , 1982 .

[7]  S. Brams,et al.  The apportionment problem. , 1982, Science.