A simple approach for accurate peptide quantification in MS-based proteomics

Despite its growing popularity and use, bottom-up proteomics remains a complex analytical methodology. Its general workflow consists of three main steps: sample preparation, liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and computational data analysis. Quality assessment of the different steps and components of this workflow is instrumental to identify technical flaws and to avoid loss of precious measurement time and sample material. However, assessment of the extent of sample losses along the sample preparation protocol, in particular after proteolytic digestion, is not yet routinely implemented because of the lack of an accurate and straightforward method to quantify peptides. Here, we report on the use of a microfluidic UV/visible spectrophotometer to quantify MS-ready peptides directly in MS loading solvent, consuming only 2 μl of sample. We determined the optimal peptide amount for LC-MS/MS analysis on a Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer using a dilution series of a commercial K562 cell digest. Careful evaluation of selected LC and MS parameters allowed us to define 3 μg as an optimal peptide amount to be injected on this particular LC-MS/MS system. Finally, using tryptic digests from human HEK293T cells, we showed that injecting equal peptide amounts, rather than approximated ones, results into less variable LC-MS/MS and protein quantification data. The obtained quality improvement together with easy implementation of the approach makes it possible to routinely quantify MS-ready peptides as a next step in daily proteomics quality control.

[1]  Lennart Martens,et al.  Computational quality control tools for mass spectrometry proteomics , 2017, Proteomics.

[2]  Qin Fu,et al.  Highly Reproducible Automated Proteomics Sample Preparation Workflow for Quantitative Mass Spectrometry. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[3]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Loss-less Nano-fractionator for High Sensitivity, High Coverage Proteomics * , 2017, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[4]  Sanwang Li,et al.  New techniques of on-line biological sample processing and their application in the field of biopharmaceutical analysis , 2016, Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B.

[5]  David L Tabb,et al.  Quality assessment for clinical proteomics. , 2013, Clinical biochemistry.

[6]  Guadalupe Espadas,et al.  Evaluation of different peptide fragmentation types and mass analyzers in data‐dependent methods using an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer , 2017, Proteomics.

[7]  Melvin A. Park,et al.  Online Parallel Accumulation–Serial Fragmentation (PASEF) with a Novel Trapped Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometer* , 2018, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[8]  M. Mann,et al.  Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells , 2014, Nature Methods.

[9]  Manuel Kleiner,et al.  More Is Not Always Better: Evaluation of 1D and 2D-LC-MS/MS Methods for Metaproteomics , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[10]  D. McCalley,et al.  The challenges of the analysis of basic compounds by high performance liquid chromatography: some possible approaches for improved separations. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  Tanveer S. Batth,et al.  Protein Aggregation Capture on Microparticles Enables Multipurpose Proteomics Sample Preparation* , 2019, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[12]  Ron Orlando,et al.  The use of ammonium formate as a mobile-phase modifier for LC-MS/MS analysis of tryptic digests. , 2013, Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT.

[13]  Christopher S. Hughes,et al.  Extending the Compatibility of the SP3 Paramagnetic Bead Processing Approach for Proteomics. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[14]  J. Wiśniewski,et al.  Fast and sensitive total protein and Peptide assays for proteomic analysis. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  Marco Y. Hein,et al.  Accurate Proteome-wide Label-free Quantification by Delayed Normalization and Maximal Peptide Ratio Extraction, Termed MaxLFQ * , 2014, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[16]  Lennart Martens,et al.  Quality control in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. , 2018, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[17]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  David L. Tabb,et al.  Performance Metrics for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Systems in Proteomics Analyses* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[19]  F. Boisvert,et al.  Phenotypic Analysis of Organoids by Proteomics , 2017, Proteomics.

[20]  Martin Eisenacher,et al.  The Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standards Initiative Quality Control Working Group: Making Quality Control More Accessible for Biological Mass Spectrometry. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[21]  Guadalupe Espadas,et al.  QCloud: A cloud-based quality control system for mass spectrometry-based proteomics laboratories , 2018, PloS one.

[22]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Nanodroplet processing platform for deep and quantitative proteome profiling of 10–100 mammalian cells , 2018, Nature Communications.

[23]  Hanno Langen,et al.  Automated Sample Preparation Platform for Mass Spectrometry-Based Plasma Proteomics and Biomarker Discovery , 2014, Biology.

[24]  Jesper V Olsen,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Q Exactive HF-X for Shotgun Proteomics. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[25]  Matthias Mann,et al.  A Novel LC System Embeds Analytes in Pre-formed Gradients for Rapid, Ultra-robust Proteomics* , 2018, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[26]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  An improved method for tracking and reducing the void volume in nano HPLC–MS with micro trapping columns , 2003, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[27]  D. McCalley,et al.  Rationalization of retention and overloading behavior of basic compounds in reversed-phase HPLC using low ionic strength buffers suitable for mass spectrometric detection. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.