Bio-inspired swing leg control for spring-mass robots running on ground with unexpected height disturbance

We proposed three swing leg control policies for spring-mass running robots, inspired by experimental data from our recent collaborative work on ground running birds. Previous investigations suggest that animals may prioritize injury avoidance and/or efficiency as their objective function during running rather than maintaining limit-cycle stability. Therefore, in this study we targeted structural capacity (maximum leg force to avoid damage) and efficiency as the main goals for our control policies, since these objective functions are crucial to reduce motor size and structure weight. Each proposed policy controls the leg angle as a function of time during flight phase such that its objective function during the subsequent stance phase is regulated. The three objective functions that are regulated in the control policies are (i) the leg peak force, (ii) the axial impulse, and (iii) the leg actuator work. It should be noted that each control policy regulates one single objective function. Surprisingly, all three swing leg control policies result in nearly identical subsequent stance phase dynamics. This implies that the implementation of any of the proposed control policies would satisfy both goals (damage avoidance and efficiency) at once. Furthermore, all three control policies require a surprisingly simple leg angle adjustment: leg retraction with constant angular acceleration.

[1]  Hartmut Geyer,et al.  Swing-leg retraction: a simple control model for stable running , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  Andre Seyfarth,et al.  Does a crouched leg posture enhance running stability and robustness? , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Marc H. Raibert,et al.  Legged Robots That Balance , 1986, IEEE Expert.

[4]  Manoj Srinivasan,et al.  Fifteen observations on the structure of energy-minimizing gaits in many simple biped models , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[5]  E. Westervelt,et al.  Feedback Control of Dynamic Bipedal Robot Locomotion , 2007 .

[6]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Comparison of cost functions for electrically driven running robots , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  H. Benjamin Brown,et al.  c ○ 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. RHex: A Biologically Inspired Hexapod Runner ∗ , 2022 .

[8]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  A Galloping Horse Model , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Alexandra S. Voloshina,et al.  The role of intrinsic muscle mechanics in the neuromuscular control of stable running in the guinea fowl , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  RHex: A Simple and Highly Mobile Hexapod Robot , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  Spring-Legged Locomotion on uneven Ground: A Control Approach to keep the running Speed constant , 2009 .

[12]  Jonathan W. Hurst,et al.  THE DESIGN OF ATRIAS 1.0 A UNIQUE MONOPOD, HOPPING ROBOT ∗ , 2012 .

[13]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Modeling posture-dependent leg actuation in sagittal plane locomotion , 2009, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[14]  Chet T Moritz,et al.  Passive dynamics change leg mechanics for an unexpected surface during human hopping. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  R J Full,et al.  Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  Arthur D. Kuo,et al.  Choosing Your Steps Carefully , 2007, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[17]  Pao Tai Lin,et al.  Mid-infrared materials and devices on a Si platform for optical sensing , 2014, Science and technology of advanced materials.

[18]  Philip Holmes,et al.  Stability Analysis of a Clock-Driven Rigid-Body SLIP Model for RHex , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Running in the real world: adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Jonathan E. Clark,et al.  Running over unknown rough terrain with a one-legged planar robot , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[21]  A. Biewener,et al.  Leg muscles that mediate stability: mechanics and control of two distal extensor muscles during obstacle negotiation in the guinea fowl , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Michael Günther,et al.  Intelligence by mechanics , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Spring-mass running: simple approximate solution and application to gait stability. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  Jonathan E. Clark,et al.  Quantifying disturbance rejection of SLIP-like running systems , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[25]  Susanne W. Lipfert,et al.  Swing leg control in human running , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[26]  Christian M. Hubicki,et al.  Swing-Leg Trajectory of Running Guinea Fowl Suggests Task-Level Priority of Force Regulation Rather than Disturbance Rejection , 2014, PloS one.

[27]  R Blickhan,et al.  Extension and Customization of Self-stability Control in Compliant Legged Systems , 2011 .

[28]  M. Daley,et al.  Birds achieve high robustness in uneven terrain through active control of landing conditions , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Running on uneven ground: leg adjustment to vertical steps and self-stability , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[30]  Kevin Blankespoor,et al.  BigDog, the Rough-Terrain Quadruped Robot , 2008 .

[31]  Martijn Wisse,et al.  The optimal swing-leg retraction rate for running , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[32]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Leg stiffness and stride frequency in human running. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  T. McMahon,et al.  The mechanics of running: how does stiffness couple with speed? , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  M. Daley,et al.  Two explanations for the compliant running paradox: reduced work of bouncing viscera and increased stability in uneven terrain , 2010, Biology Letters.

[35]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Koushil Sreenath,et al.  MABEL, a new robotic bipedal walker and runner , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[37]  Andrew A Biewener,et al.  Running over rough terrain reveals limb control for intrinsic stability , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  R. Blickhan The spring-mass model for running and hopping. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  A movement criterion for running. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  H. Geyer,et al.  Natural control of spring-like running : Optimised selfstabilisation , 2002 .