On the Diagnosticity of Multiple-Witness Identifications

[1]  Ryan T. Howell,et al.  Regularities in Eyewitness Identification , 2008, Law and human behavior.

[2]  J. Read,et al.  Adult Eyewitness Testimony: Current Trends and Developments , 2007 .

[3]  M. Scott,et al.  The Multiple Dimensions of Tunnel Vision in Criminal Cases , 2006 .

[4]  H. Paterson,et al.  Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion , 2006 .

[5]  A. Douglass,et al.  A Problem with Double-Blind Photospread Procedures: Photospread Administrators Use One Eyewitness's Confidence to Influence the Identification of Another Eyewitness , 2005, Law and human behavior.

[6]  S. Clark.  A Re-examination of the Effects of Biased Lineup Instructions in Eyewitness Identification , 2005, Law and human behavior.

[7]  Daniel B Wright,et al.  Social recognition memory: the effect of other people's responses for previously seen and unseen items. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[8]  Samuel R. Gross,et al.  Exonerations in the United States, 1989 through 2003 , 2005 .

[9]  R. Fisher,et al.  Effects of administrator-witness contact on eyewitness identification accuracy. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  C. A. Morgan,et al.  Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress. , 2004, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[11]  Steven E. Clark,et al.  A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification , 2003 .

[12]  R. Bull,et al.  Exposure duration: effects on eyewitness accuracy and confidence. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[13]  Kevin Allan,et al.  Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? , 2003 .

[14]  Elizabeth A. Olson,et al.  Eyewitness identification: information gain from incriminating and exonerating behaviors. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[15]  S. Clark,et al.  Selecting Lineup Foils in Eyewitness Identification Experiments: Experimental Control and Real-World Simulation , 2001, Law and human behavior.

[16]  H L Roediger,et al.  Social contagion of memory , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  A. Hori,et al.  Group collaboration in recognition memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  S. Clark,et al.  Selecting Foils for Identification Lineups: Matching Suspects or Descriptions? , 2000, Law and human behavior.

[19]  R. Malpass,et al.  Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and Photospreads , 1998 .

[20]  A. Levi.  Are Defendants Guilty If They Were Chosen in a Lineup? , 1998 .

[21]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  "Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. , 1998 .

[22]  R. Nickerson.  Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[23]  N. Steblay,et al.  Social Influence in Eyewitness Recall: A Meta-Analytic Review of Lineup Instruction Effects , 1997 .

[24]  Anders Winman,et al.  Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation , 1996 .

[25]  D. Wright,et al.  Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real line‐ups , 1996 .

[26]  R. C. L. Lindsay,et al.  Default values in eyewitness descriptions , 1994 .

[27]  J. Yuille,et al.  Adult Eyewitness Testimony: Actual victims and witnesses to robbery and fraud: An archival analysis , 1994 .

[28]  Sven-Åke Christianson,et al.  The Handbook of Emotion and Memory : Research and Theory , 1994 .

[29]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  The selection of distractors for eyewitness lineups , 1993 .

[30]  G. Wells,et al.  Eyewitness identification: The importance of lineup models. , 1986 .

[31]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification. , 1985 .

[32]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  The Influence of Eyewitness Nonidentifications on Mock‐Jurors' Judgments of a Court Case1 , 1985 .

[33]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  Evaluating Identification Evidence from Multiple Eyewitnesses , 1982 .

[34]  R. Malpass.  Effective size and defendant bias in eyewitness identification lineups , 1981 .

[35]  G. S. Sanders.  Truth and consequences: The effect of responsibility on eyewitness behavior. , 1981 .

[36]  R. Lindsay,et al.  What price justice? , 1980 .

[37]  R. Lindsay,et al.  On Estimating the Diagnosticity of Eyewitness Nonidentifications , 1980 .

[38]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  Why Do Eyewitnesses Make So Many Mistakes , 1980 .

[39]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup , 1979 .

[40]  G. E. Berrios,et al.  . New York: Cambridge , 2000 .

[41]  John C. Yuille,et al.  A model of the diverse effects of emotion on eyewitness memory. , 1992 .

[42]  G. Wells.  Eyewitness identification: A system handbook , 1988 .

[43]  H. A. Mcallister,et al.  Juror underutilization of eyewitness nonidentifications: Theoretical and practical implications. , 1986 .

[44]  A. Greenwald.  Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null Hypothesis , 1975 .

[45]  N. Sobel.  Eye-witness identification: legal and practical problems, , 1972 .