Transportation Planning for Disasters: An Accessibility Approach

A methodology is developed in this paper for evaluating and enhancing the performance of urban transportation systems in the aftermath of a disaster. A performance measure is proposed for assessing overall and distributional impacts based on the concept of accessibility. The methodology is demonstrated with two case studies. The first focuses on passenger railroad disruption in the catastrophic 1995 Kobe earthquake in Japan. An accessibility measure is applied to evaluate the loss of transportation service and, in particular, its attendant spatial disparities. Alternative repair and restoration strategies are investigated and shown, in hindsight, to be preferable to the actual sequence of repairs. The second case study focuses on the potential loss of road and highway transportation in Seattle, WA, after a hypothetical earthquake. A refined accessibility measure is applied that accounts for postdisaster detouring and congestion. Again, this brings attention to spatial disparities in loss and the spatial implications of alternative restoration priorities. It further demonstrates that restoration strategies should be designed from a systems perspective. The limitations and broader applicability of the approach are discussed.

[1]  S. Tabaie,et al.  Cost-of-Delay Studies for Freeway Closures Caused by Northridge Earthquake , 1996 .

[2]  T. J. Kim,et al.  Economic impacts of transportation network changes: Implementation of a combined transportation network and input-output model , 2002 .

[3]  Stephanie E. Chang.  Structural Change in Urban Economies: Recovery and Long-Term Impacts in the l995 Kobe Earthquake (特集 震災と復興の経済分析) , 2001 .

[4]  James E. Moore,et al.  A RISK-BASED METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF HIGHWAY SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[5]  Dong Liu,et al.  Accesibility measures of U.S. metropolitan areas , 1993 .

[6]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective , 2001 .

[7]  D Ballantyne,et al.  SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF THE SEATTLE-TACOMA HIGHWAY CORRIDOR USING HAZUS , 2002 .

[8]  J. M. Morris,et al.  Accessibility indicators for transport planning , 1979 .

[9]  M. Kwan.  Gender and Individual Access to Urban Opportunities: A Study Using Space–Time Measures , 1999 .

[10]  Gordon Pirie,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: A Review and Proposal , 1979 .

[11]  J. G. Koenig,et al.  Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application , 1980 .

[12]  Jerry T. Mitchell,et al.  Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of Georgetown County, South Carolina , 2000 .

[13]  D. Briggs.  GIS for Emergency Preparedness and Health Risk Reduction , 2002 .

[14]  Peter J. Rimmer,et al.  Macroaccessibility and Mesoaccessibility: A Case Study of Sapporo, Japan , 1982 .

[15]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Integrating Transportation Network and Regional Economic Models to Estimate the Costs of a Large Urban Earthquake , 2001 .

[16]  B. Davis.  TRANSPORT-RELATED IMPACTS OF THE NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE , 1998 .

[17]  Bruce Appleyard,et al.  Tracking Accessibility: Employment and Housing Opportunities in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1999 .

[18]  W. G. Hansen.  How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[19]  James E. Moore,et al.  Loss Estimation Due to Seismic Risks to Highway Systems , 1997 .

[20]  Richard L. Church,et al.  Modelling Community Evacuation Vulnerability Using GIS , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..