Autonomy versus futility? Barriers to good clinical practice in end‐of‐life care: a Queensland case

Findings from a Queensland coronial inquest highlight the complex clinical, ethical and legal issues that arise in end‐of‐life care when clinicians and family members disagree about a diagnosis of clinical futility. The tension between the law and best medical practice is highlighted in this case, as doctors are compelled to seek family consent to not commence a futile intervention. Good communication between doctors and families, as well as community and professional education, is essential to resolve tensions that can arise when there is disagreement about treatment at the end of life.

[1]  M. Parker Futile choices: Wooing doctors to acknowledge the law in Queensland. , 2010, Journal of Law and Medicine.

[2]  B. Mast,et al.  The impact of anticipatory grief on caregiver burden in dementia caregivers. , 2009, The Gerontologist.

[3]  C. Marco,et al.  Ethical issues of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: comparison of emergency physician practices from 1995 to 2007. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[4]  S. Winch,et al.  Nurses' Moral Sensitivity and Hospital Ethical Climate: a Literature Review , 2008, Nursing ethics.

[5]  B. Murphy What has happened to clinical leadership in futile care discussions? , 2008, The Medical journal of Australia.

[6]  B. Ferrell Understanding the moral distress of nurses witnessing medically futile care. , 2006, Oncology nursing forum.

[7]  B. White,et al.  Rethinking Life-Sustaining Measures: Questions for Queensland , 2005 .

[8]  D. Weissman Decision making at a time of crisis near the end of life. , 2004, JAMA.

[9]  L. S. Meltzer,et al.  Critical care nurses' perceptions of futile care and its effect on burnout. , 2004, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.