Integral equation approach to time-dependent kinematic dynamos in finite domains.

The homogeneous dynamo effect is at the root of cosmic magnetic field generation. With only a very few exceptions, the numerical treatment of homogeneous dynamos is carried out in the framework of the differential equation approach. The present paper tries to facilitate the use of integral equations in dynamo research. Apart from the pedagogical value to illustrate dynamo action within the well-known picture of the Biot-Savart law, the integral equation approach has a number of practical advantages. The first advantage is its proven numerical robustness and stability. The second and perhaps most important advantage is its applicability to dynamos in arbitrary geometries. The third advantage is its intimate connection to inverse problems relevant not only for dynamos but also for technical applications of magnetohydrodynamics. The paper provides the first general formulation and application of the integral equation approach to time-dependent kinematic dynamos, with stationary dynamo sources, in finite domains. The time dependence is restricted to the magnetic field, whereas the velocity or corresponding mean-field sources of dynamo action are supposed to be stationary. For the spherically symmetric alpha2 dynamo model it is shown how the general formulation is reduced to a coupled system of two radial integral equations for the defining scalars of the poloidal and toroidal field components. The integral equation formulation for spherical dynamos with general stationary velocity fields is also derived. Two numerical examples--the alpha2 dynamo model with radially varying alpha and the Bullard-Gellman model--illustrate the equivalence of the approach with the usual differential equation method. The main advantage of the method is exemplified by the treatment of an alpha2 dynamo in rectangular domains.

[1]  G. Gerbeth,et al.  The Riga Dynamo Experiment , 2003 .

[2]  A. Meir,et al.  A velocity-current formulation for stationary MHD flow , 1994 .

[3]  Matthias Rheinhardt,et al.  The Karlsruhe Dynamo Experiment. A Mean Field Approach , 1998 .

[4]  Dennis DeTurck,et al.  The Biot–Savart operator for application to knot theory, fluid dynamics, and plasma physics , 2001 .

[5]  A. J. Barret,et al.  Methods of Mathematical Physics, Volume I . R. Courant and D. Hilbert. Interscience Publishers Inc., New York. 550 pp. Index. 75s. net. , 1954, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[6]  COMPUTATIONAL FLUID AND SOLID MECHANICS 2003 , .

[7]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[8]  H. K. Moffatt Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids , 1978 .

[9]  Frank Stefani,et al.  Velocity reconstruction in conducting fluids from magnetic field and electric potential measurements , 1999 .

[10]  Robert F. Stein,et al.  Dynamo-generated Turbulence and Large-Scale Magnetic Fields in a Keplerian Shear Flow , 1995 .

[11]  B. Farrell,et al.  Stochastic Dynamics of Field Generation in Conducting Fluids , 1999 .

[12]  G. Gerbeth,et al.  Colloquium: Laboratory experiments on hydromagnetic dynamos , 2002 .

[13]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[14]  R. Stieglitz,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a homogeneous two-scale dynamo , 2000 .

[15]  P. Roberts An introduction to magnetohydrodynamics , 1967 .

[16]  S. Runcorn The application of modern physics to the earth and planetary interiors , 1969 .

[17]  Gerbeth,et al.  Detection of a flow induced magnetic field eigenmode in the riga dynamo facility , 2000, Physical review letters.

[18]  R. Courant,et al.  Methods of Mathematical Physics , 1962 .

[19]  B. Farrell,et al.  Optimal Excitation of Magnetic Fields , 1999 .

[20]  T Gundrum,et al.  Magnetic field saturation in the Riga dynamo experiment. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[21]  Oscillatory mean-field dynamos with a spherically symmetric, isotropic helical turbulence parameter alpha. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  A. Meir,et al.  Analysis and Numerical Approximation of a Stationary MHD Flow Problem with Nonideal Boundary , 1999 .

[23]  W. Dobler,et al.  An integral equation approach to kinematic dynamo models , 1998 .

[24]  H. Fuchs,et al.  Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics c○European Geophysical Society 2002 On the mean-field theory of the Karlsruhe Dynamo Experiment , 2001 .

[25]  Frank Stefani,et al.  A contactless method for velocity reconstruction in electrically conducting fluids , 2000 .

[26]  R. Stieglitz,et al.  Can the Earth's magnetic field be simulated in the laboratory? , 2000, Naturwissenschaften.

[27]  R. W. James,et al.  Time-dependent kinematic dynamos with stationary flows , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[28]  Frank Stefani,et al.  Steady dynamos in finite domains: an integral equation approach , 2000, astro-ph/0001524.

[29]  G. Rudiger,et al.  MHD instability in differentially-rotating cylindric flows , 2001 .

[30]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[31]  Frank Stefani,et al.  On the uniqueness of velocity reconstruction in conducting fluids from measurements of induced electromagnetic fields , 2000 .

[32]  F. Stefani,et al.  The integral equation method for a steady kinematic dynamo problem , 2004 .