Cartilage surface characterization by frictional dissipated energy during axially loaded knee flexion--an in vitro sheep model.

Cartilage defects and osteoarthritis (OA) have an increasing incidence in the aging population. A wide range of treatment options are available. The introduction of each new treatment requires controlled, evidence based, histological and biomechanical studies to identify potential benefits. Especially for the biomechanical testing there is a lack of established methods which combine a physiologic testing environment of complete joints with the possibility of body-weight simulation. The current in-vitro study presents a new method for the measurement of friction properties of cartilage on cartilage in its individual joint environment including the synovial fluid. Seven sheep knee joints were cyclically flexed and extended under constant axial load with intact joint capsule using a 6° of freedom robotic system. During the cyclic motion, the flexion angle and the respective torque were recorded and the dissipated energy was calculated. Different mechanically induced cartilage defect sizes (16 mm², 50 mm², 200 mm²) were examined and compared to the intact situation at varying levels of the axial load. The introduced setup could significantly distinguish between most of the defect sizes for all load levels above 200 N. For these higher load levels, a high reproducibility was achieved (coefficient of variation between 4% and 17%). The proposed method simulates a natural environment for the analysis of cartilage on cartilage friction properties and is able to differentiate between different cartilage defect sizes. Therefore, it is considered as an innovative method for the testing of new treatment options for cartilage defects.

[1]  Joshua M Rosvold,et al.  A comparison of passive flexion-extension to normal gait in the ovine stifle joint. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  G. Torkaman,et al.  Biotribological and biomechanical changes after experimental haemarthrosis in the rabbit knee , 2011, Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia.

[3]  G A Livesay,et al.  A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligaments. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  J. Crisco,et al.  Comparison of two methods for calculating the frictional properties of articular cartilage using a simple pendulum and intact mouse knee joints. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Ligaments and articular contact guide passive knee flexion. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  D Dowson,et al.  "Boosted lubrication" in synovial joints by fluid entrapment and enrichment. , 1968, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  G. Jay,et al.  Frictional properties of Hartley guinea pig knees with and without proteolytic disruption of the articular surfaces. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[8]  G. Ateshian,et al.  Removal of the superficial zone of bovine articular cartilage does not increase its frictional coefficient. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[9]  Kyriacos A Athanasiou,et al.  Engineering lubrication in articular cartilage. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[10]  Gerard A Ateshian,et al.  Effect of dynamic loading on the frictional response of bovine articular cartilage. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  S Arai,et al.  The use of robotics technology to study human joint kinematics: a new methodology. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  J. O'Connor,et al.  The components of passive knee movement are coupled to flexion angle. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  J. D. Withrow,et al.  Biomechanics of Knee Ligaments , 1993, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  V. Sikavitsas,et al.  Experimental Friction Coefficients for Bovine Cartilage Measured with a Pin-on-Disk Tribometer: Testing Configuration and Lubricant Effects , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  S. Nakaji,et al.  Knee osteoarthritis, knee joint pain and aging in relation to increasing serum hyaluronan level in the Japanese population. , 2011, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[16]  E. Tanaka,et al.  The Frictional Coefficient of the Temporomandibular Joint and Its Dependency on the Magnitude and Duration of Joint Loading , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[17]  J. Bijlsma,et al.  The canine 'groove' model of osteoarthritis is more than simply the expression of surgically applied damage. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[18]  S. Woo,et al.  The importance of quadriceps and hamstring muscle loading on knee kinematics and in-situ forces in the ACL. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Afshin Khalafi,et al.  Mechanotransduction of bovine articular cartilage superficial zone protein by transforming growth factor beta signaling. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  J CHARNLEY,et al.  The Lubrication of Animal Joints in Relation to Surgical Reconstruction by Arthroplasty * , 1960, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[21]  J. Crisco,et al.  Assuming exponential decay by incorporating viscous damping improves the prediction of the coeffcient of friction in pendulum tests of whole articular joints , 2007, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[22]  K. Komvopoulos,et al.  Increased friction coefficient and superficial zone protein expression in patients with advanced osteoarthritis. , 2010, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[23]  G. Jay,et al.  Coefficients of friction, lubricin, and cartilage damage in the anterior cruciate ligament‐deficient guinea pig knee , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.