Causal Modeling: Methods and Their Application to Speech and Language

With the advent of non-invasive functional neuroimaging methods in the late 1970s, localization theories of language—based on brain lesion studies—have long given way to distributed models of language, implicating a network of sequential and parallel functional connections. This renders the processes within the speech and language network well suited to effective connectivity analysis using causal modeling approaches. Despite the large number of studies examining various components of the language system, the relationship between these processes and the directionality of causal influences between the brain regions mediating these processes remain far less understood. The chapter presents select studies that have used causal modeling to investigate the neural basis of speech and language networks in healthy controls and clinical populations drawing on measures of directed functional connectivity and effective connectivity like Granger Causality and DCM. Applications to novel data from magnetoencephalography illustrate the usefulness of this approach to disorders of higher level cognition.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses: The role of intrinsic connections , 2007, NeuroImage.

[2]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Combining Functional and Anatomical Connectivity Reveals Brain Networks for Auditory Language Comprehension , 2022 .

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding , 2012, Neuron.

[4]  W. Ganong Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  K. Müller,et al.  Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[6]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[7]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  Lexical influences on speech perception: A Granger causality analysis of MEG and EEG source estimates , 2008, NeuroImage.

[8]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Auditory temporal perception deficits in the reading-impaired: A critical review of the evidence , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Neural masses and fields in dynamic causal modeling , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses , 2008, NeuroImage.

[11]  K. Amunts,et al.  Effective connectivity of the left BA 44, BA 45, and inferior temporal gyrus during lexical and phonological decisions identified with DCM , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Gamma Oscillations and Neural Field DCMs Can Reveal Cortical Excitability and Microstructure , 2014 .

[14]  Peter König,et al.  On the directionality of cortical interactions studied by structural analysis of electrophysiological recordings , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[16]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Contrast gain control and horizontal interactions in V1: A DCM study , 2014, NeuroImage.

[18]  William D. Penny,et al.  Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech , 2016, NeuroImage.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  Gordon Pipa,et al.  Transfer entropy—a model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[21]  Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh,et al.  Subspace-based Identification Algorithm for characterizing causal networks in resting brain , 2011, NeuroImage.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling with neural fields , 2012, NeuroImage.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Task-Dependent Modulation of Effective Connectivity within the Default Mode Network , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[25]  Daniel T. Wehner,et al.  The influence of semantic processing on phonological decisions in children and adults: a magnetoencephalography (MEG) study. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[26]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  A systems perspective on the effective connectivity of overt speech production , 2009, NeuroImage.

[27]  M. Seghier,et al.  The Importance of Premotor Cortex for Supporting Speech Production after Left Capsular-Putaminal Damage , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses in EEG/MEG with lead field parameterization , 2006, NeuroImage.

[29]  Erin L. Meier,et al.  Changes in task-based effective connectivity in language networks following rehabilitation in post-stroke patients with aphasia , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  Hua Shu,et al.  The role of the premotor cortex and the primary motor cortex in action verb comprehension: Evidence from Granger causality analysis , 2012, Brain Research Bulletin.

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[32]  R. Knight,et al.  Redefining the role of Broca’s area in speech , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Maria Mody,et al.  Gamma phase locking modulated by phonological contrast during auditory comprehension in reading disability , 2012, Neuroreport.

[34]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Different roles of cytoarchitectonic BA 44 and BA 45 in phonological and semantic verbal fluency as revealed by dynamic causal modelling , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[36]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  Direction of magnetoencephalography sources associated with feedback and feedforward contributions in a visual object recognition task , 2015, Neuroscience Letters.

[37]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG , 2006, NeuroImage.

[38]  Demis Basso,et al.  Sensory‐motor brain network connectivity for speech comprehension , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[39]  R. Douglas,et al.  A functional microcircuit for cat visual cortex. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  Modeling the effect of dendritic input location on MEG and EEG source dipoles , 2015, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[41]  Juan R. Vidal,et al.  How Silent Is Silent Reading? Intracerebral Evidence for Top-Down Activation of Temporal Voice Areas during Reading , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Jan Kujala,et al.  Neural interactions at the core of phonological and semantic priming of written words. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Generalised filtering and stochastic DCM for fMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[44]  A. Seth,et al.  Granger Causality Analysis in Neuroscience and Neuroimaging , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[46]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[47]  Daniel T. Wehner,et al.  Auditory word perception in sentence context in reading-disabled children , 2008, Neuroreport.

[48]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of lateral interactions in the visual cortex , 2013, NeuroImage.