Characterization, controlling, and reduction of uncertainties in the modeling and observation of land-surface systems

Uncertainty is one of the greatest challenges in the quantitative understanding of land-surface systems. This paper discusses the sources of uncertainty in land-surface systems and the possible means to reduce and control this uncertainty. From the perspective of model simulation, the primary source of uncertainty is the high heterogeneity of parameters, state variables, and near-surface atmospheric states. From the perspective of observation, we first utilize the concept of representativeness error to unify the errors caused by scale representativeness. The representativeness error also originates mainly from spatial heterogeneity. With the aim of controlling and reducing uncertainties, here we demonstrate the significance of integrating modeling and observations as they are complementary and propose to treat complex land-surface systems with a stochastic perspective. In addition, through the description of two modern methods of data assimilation, we delineate how data assimilation characterizes and controls uncertainties by maximally integrating modeling and observational information, thereby enhancing the predictability and observability of the system. We suggest that the next-generation modeling should depict the statistical distribution of dynamic systems and that the observations should capture spatial heterogeneity and quantify the representativeness error of observations.

[1]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Bayesian analysis of data-worth considering model and parameter uncertainties , 2012 .

[2]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  A conceptual model for effective directional emissivity from nonisothermal surfaces , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  Diederik Jacques,et al.  Indirect estimation of near-saturated hydraulic conductivity from readily available soil information , 2002 .

[4]  Garrison Sposito,et al.  Scale Dependence and Scale Invariance in Hydrology , 1998 .

[5]  L. A. Richards Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums , 1931 .

[6]  Olivier Talagrand,et al.  Assimilation of Observations, an Introduction (gtSpecial IssueltData Assimilation in Meteology and Oceanography: Theory and Practice) , 1997 .

[7]  John C. Gille,et al.  Earth Observations from Space: The First 50 Years of Scientific Achievements , 2007 .

[8]  D. Randall,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part I: Model Formulation , 1996 .

[9]  Bai Yu-long A Bayesian Filter Framework for Sequential Data Assimilation , 2010 .

[10]  Xubin Zeng,et al.  Improving the Numerical Solution of Soil Moisture-Based Richards Equation for Land Models with a Deep or Shallow Water Table , 2009 .

[11]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  Development of objective‐oriented groundwater models: 1. Robust parameter identification , 2007 .

[12]  I M Young,et al.  Interactions and Self-Organization in the Soil-Microbe Complex , 2004, Science.

[13]  Huang Chunlin,et al.  Development of a Chinese land data assimilation system: its progress and prospects , 2007 .

[14]  Robert M. Glorioso,et al.  Engineering Cybernetics , 1975 .

[15]  Scott W. Tyler,et al.  An explanation of scale‐dependent dispersivity in heterogeneous aquifers using concepts of fractal geometry , 1988 .

[16]  Pavel Kabat,et al.  The scaling characteristics of soil parameters: From plot scale heterogeneity to subgrid parameterization , 1997 .

[17]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Cybernetics: Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[18]  Keith Beven,et al.  Linking parameters across scales: Subgrid parameterizations and scale dependent hydrological models. , 1995 .

[19]  Wang Li,et al.  Identification of the Angel-related elements in cyprinid fishes and their phylogenetic implications , 2007 .

[20]  A. Strahler,et al.  Scale effects and scaling-up by geometric-optical model , 1999 .