Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet

The internet could be an efficient political instrument if it were seen as part of a democracy where free and open discourse within a vital public sphere plays a decisive role. The model of deliberative democracy, as developed by Jürgen Habermas and Seyla Benhabib, serves this concept of democracy best. The paper explores first the model of deliberative democracy as a ‘two-track model’ in which representative democracy is backed by the public sphere and a developing civil society. Secondly, it outlines the normative concept of the public sphere and its basic ideas, namely the uncoerced communication of equal participants with equal access and equal rights to intervene or propose themes. The third part for discussion shows how the internet could fit into this concept of public sphere and influence the quality of political debates, and emphasizes the important role it can play in the political process.

[1]  Carl Swanson.  ON THE POINT , 1995 .

[2]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Public and its Problems , 1927 .

[3]  Jean-françois Lyotard.  La condition postmoderne : Rapport sur le savoir , 1979 .

[4]  B. Barber.  Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[5]  I. Young.  Impartiality and the Civic Public: Some Implications of Feminist Critiques of Moral and Political Theory , 1985 .

[6]  R. Rorty.  Contingency, irony, and solidarity: Contents , 1989 .

[7]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society , 1989 .

[8]  Nancy Fraser.  Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy , 1990 .

[9]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[10]  Jean Louise Cohen,et al.  Civil Society and Political Theory , 2020, Crime, Inequality and the State.

[11]  Anne Phillips,et al.  Democracy and difference , 1993 .

[12]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda , 1993 .

[13]  C. Calhoun,et al.  Habermas and the Public Sphere. , 1993 .

[14]  Bernhard Peters,et al.  Die Integration moderner Gesellschaften , 1993 .

[15]  Michael Walzer,et al.  Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad , 1994 .

[16]  F. Neidhardt.  Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen , 1994 .

[17]  Gerhard Göhler.  Macht der Öffentlichkeit-Öffentlichkeit der Macht , 1995 .

[18]  Bittere Bytes: Cyberbürger und Demokratietheorie , 1996 .

[19]  I. Kant,et al.  The Metaphysics of Morals , 1997, The Ontology of Prejudice.

[20]  D. Rasmussen.  Handbook of critical theory , 1996 .

[21]  B. Sweetman.  Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy , 1997 .

[22]  G. Frankenberg.  Die Verfassung der Republik : Autorität und Solidarität in der Zivilgesellschaft , 1997 .

[23]  A. Noll.  Die Verfassung der Republik , 1997 .

[24]  On public deliberation and public culture , 1997 .

[25]  Edmund F. Byrne,et al.  Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political , 1999 .

[26]  John Rawls,et al.  政治自由主义 = Political liberalism , 2000 .

[27]  M. Walzer.  Toward a Global Civil Society , 2022 .

[28]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  The Good Society , 2002 .