Inferotemporal cortex multiplexes behaviorally-relevant target match signals and visual representations in a manner that minimizes their interference

Finding a sought visual target object requires combining visual information about a scene with a remembered representation of the target to create a “target match” signal that indicates when a target is in view. Target match signals have been reported to exist within high-level visual brain areas including inferotemporal cortex (IT), where they are mixed with representations of image and object identity. However, these signals are not well understood, particularly in the context of the real-world challenge that the objects we search for typically appear at different positions, sizes, and within different background contexts. To investigate these signals, we recorded neural responses in IT as two rhesus monkeys performed a delayed-match-to-sample object search task in which target objects could appear at a variety of identity-preserving transformations. Consistent with the existence of behaviorally-relevant target match signals in IT, we found that IT contained a linearly separable target match representation that reflected behavioral confusions on trials in which the monkeys made errors. Additionally, target match signals were highly distributed across the IT population, and while a small fraction of units reflected target match signals as target match suppression, most units reflected target match signals as target match enhancement. Finally, we found that the potentially detrimental impact of target match signals on visual representations was mitigated by target match modulation that was approximately (albeit imperfectly) multiplicative. Together, these results support the existence of a robust, behaviorally-relevant target match representation in IT that is configured to minimally interfere with IT visual representations.

[1]  L. Optican,et al.  Role of inferior temporal neurons in visual memory. I. Temporal encoding of information about visual images, recalled images, and behavioral context. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Jay A. Hennig,et al.  Signal Multiplexing and Single-Neuron Computations in Lateral Intraparietal Area During Decision-Making , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  James J. DiCarlo,et al.  How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition? , 2012, Neuron.

[4]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks , 2013, Nature.

[5]  R. Desimone,et al.  Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory. , 1994, Science.

[6]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[7]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Neural Quadratic Discriminant Analysis: Nonlinear Decoding with V1-Like Computation , 2016, Neural Computation.

[8]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  A category-free neural population supports evolving demands during decision-making , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Distinct Encoding of Spatial and Nonspatial Visual Information in Parietal Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Sensory modality specificity of neural activity related to memory in visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J Duncan,et al.  Responses of neurons in macaque area V4 during memory-guided visual search. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Nicole C. Rust,et al.  Signals in inferotemporal and perirhinal cortex suggest an “untangling” of visual target information , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Tatiana A. Engel,et al.  Same or Different? A Neural Circuit Mechanism of Similarity-Based Pattern Match Decision Making , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Naoshige Uchida,et al.  Demixed principal component analysis of neural population data , 2014, eLife.

[15]  Nicole C Rust,et al.  Dynamic Target Match Signals in Perirhinal Cortex Can Be Explained by Instantaneous Computations That Act on Dynamic Input from Inferotemporal Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Fyall,et al.  The Role of Visual Area V4 in the Discrimination of Partially Occluded Shapes , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Activity of Inferior Temporal Cortical Neurons Predicts Recognition Choice Behavior and Recognition Time during Visual Search , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Independent Category and Spatial Encoding in Parietal Cortex , 2013, Neuron.

[19]  Wieland Brendel,et al.  Demixed Principal Component Analysis , 2011, NIPS.

[20]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4 , 2005, Science.

[21]  R. Desimone,et al.  Responses of Neurons in Inferior Temporal Cortex during Memory- Guided Visual Search , 1998 .

[22]  Nicole C Rust,et al.  Quantifying the signals contained in heterogeneous neural responses and determining their relationships with task performance. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Nicole C. Rust,et al.  Selectivity and Tolerance (“Invariance”) Both Increase as Visual Information Propagates from Cortical Area V4 to IT , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Maunsell,et al.  State dependent activity in monkey visual cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  W. Newsome,et al.  Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex , 2013, Nature.

[26]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Extraretinal representations in area V4 in the macaque monkey , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[27]  R. Desimone,et al.  Inferior temporal mechanisms for invariant object recognition. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Trade-Off between Object Selectivity and Tolerance in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Author ' s personal copy Representational geometry : integrating cognition , computation , and the brain , 2013 .

[30]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Neural Dynamics in Inferior Temporal Cortex during a Visual Working Memory Task , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Stefano Fusi,et al.  The Sparseness of Mixed Selectivity Neurons Controls the Generalization–Discrimination Trade-Off , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.