Reliability and repeatability of swept‐source Fourier‐domain optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus

PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability and reliability of a recently introduced swept‐source Fourier‐domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS‐OCT) system and a high‐resolution Scheimpflug camera and to assess the agreement between the 2 instruments when measuring healthy eyes and eyes with keratoconus. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. METHODS: Three consecutive series of anterior segment images were taken with AS‐OCT (Casia SS‐1000) followed by rotating Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam high resolution). Axial keratometry in the steep and flat meridians and astigmatism values were recorded. Pachymetry in the apex, center, and the thinnest position and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements were also taken. RESULTS: This study enrolled 57 healthy volunteers (57 eyes) and 56 patients (84 eyes) with keratoconus. Significant difference was found in all measured anterior segment parameters between normal eyes and keratoconic eyes (P<.05). In keratoconic eyes, the difference between repeated measurements was less with AS‐OCT than with Scheimpflug imaging in every keratometry and astigmatism value, in apical thickness, and in ACD. For keratometry, the thinnest and central pachymetry measurement repeatability was better in healthy eyes than in keratoconic eyes with both instruments. In general, the mean difference between AS‐OCT and Scheimpflug imaging was higher in cases of keratoconus. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in keratometry, pachymetry, and ACD results were found between AS‐OCT and Scheimpflug imaging. However, the repeatability of the measurements was comparable. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

[1]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography , 1991, LEOS '92 Conference Proceedings.

[2]  C. McGhee,et al.  Orbscan computerized topography: Attributes, applications, and limitations , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  Yoshiaki Yasuno,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility of anterior ocular biometric measurements with 2‐dimensional and 3‐dimensional optical coherence tomography , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  Ö. Uçakhan,et al.  Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  M. Belin,et al.  An introduction to understanding elevation‐based topography: how elevation data are displayed – a review , 2009, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[6]  K. Pesudovs,et al.  Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: Comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  J. Alió,et al.  Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  D. Grewal,et al.  Assessment of central corneal thickness in normal, keratoconus, and post‐laser in situ keratomileusis eyes using Scheimpflug imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and ultrasound pachymetry , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Measurement error , 1996 .

[10]  L. Richiardi,et al.  Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  M. Wojtkowski,et al.  Ultra high-speed swept source OCT imaging of the anterior segment of human eye at 200 kHz with adjustable imaging range. , 2009, Optics express.

[12]  S. Yoloğlu,et al.  Evaluation of anterior segment parameters in keratoconic eyes measured with the Pentacam system , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[13]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical biopsy and imaging using optical coherence tomography , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[14]  Z. Nagy,et al.  Evaluation of Keratometric, Pachymetric, and Elevation Parameters of Keratoconic Corneas With Pentacam , 2009, Cornea.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[16]  Chi Pui Pang,et al.  Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[17]  J. Krachmer,et al.  Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. , 1984, Survey of ophthalmology.

[18]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[19]  B S Fine,et al.  Round and oval cones in keratoconus. , 1980, Ophthalmology.

[20]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[21]  G. Ripandelli,et al.  Optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[22]  Changhuei Yang,et al.  Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. , 2003, Optics express.

[23]  M. Gordon,et al.  Quality of life in keratoconus. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Pentacam Scheimpflug quantitative imaging of the crystalline lens and intraocular lens. , 2009, Journal of refractive surgery.

[25]  D. Pham,et al.  Histopathological correlation of corneal diseases with optical coherence tomography , 2002, Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[26]  T. Yatagai,et al.  Three-dimensional and high-speed swept-source optical coherence tomography for in vivo investigation of human anterior eye segments. , 2005, Optics express.

[27]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[28]  J. Németh,et al.  Anterior chamber characteristics of keratoconus assessed by rotating Scheimpflug imaging , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[29]  Toyohiko Yatagai,et al.  High-Speed, swept-source optical coherence tomography: a 3-dimensional view of anterior chamber angle recession. , 2006, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[30]  S H Yun,et al.  Motion artifacts in optical coherence tomography with frequency-domain ranging. , 2004, Optics express.

[31]  Yoshiaki Yasuno,et al.  Anterior ocular biometry using 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[32]  Carroll A.B. Webers,et al.  Value of optical coherence tomography for anterior segment surgery , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[33]  Yan Li,et al.  Keratoconus diagnosis with optical coherence tomography pachymetry mapping. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[34]  Yan Li,et al.  Clinical and research applications of anterior segment optical coherence tomography – a review , 2009, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[35]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  J. Izatt,et al.  Correction of geometric and refractive image distortions in optical coherence tomography applying Fermat's principle. , 2002, Optics express.

[37]  Alfred Wegener,et al.  Photography of the anterior eye segment according to Scheimpflug's principle: options and limitations – a review , 2009, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[38]  D. Lam,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility of pachymetric mapping with Visante anterior segment-optical coherence tomography. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.