Tuned POD Galerkin models for transient feedback regulation of the cylinder wake

Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) Galerkin models are typically obtained from a single reference, such as an attractor. The POD model provides a very efficient representation of the reference but is often incapable to handle transient dynamics and other changes in flow conditions. These shortcomings are detrimental in feedback flow control applications. A novel concept of tuned Galerkin models is suggested, by which the global model interpolates a succession of similar-structure local models. The tuned model covers a controlled transient manifold, compensating for the gradual deformation of dominant flow structures, along such transients. The model is an enabler for both improved tracking performance, as well as for optimized control hardware placement, taking into account the entire dynamic range of interest. These concepts are demonstrated in the benchmark of stabilization of the wake flow behind a circular cylinder.

[1]  Gilead Tadmor,et al.  Observers and feedback control for a rotating vortex pair , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[2]  B. R. Noack,et al.  Actuation models and dissipative control in empirical Galerkin models of fluid flows , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[3]  L. Cordier,et al.  Optimal rotary control of the cylinder wake using proper orthogonal decomposition reduced-order model , 2005 .

[4]  Bernd R. Noack,et al.  The need for a pressure-term representation in empirical Galerkin models of incompressible shear flows , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  R. Murray,et al.  Model reduction for compressible flows using POD and Galerkin projection , 2004 .

[6]  D. Rockwell,et al.  On vortex formation from a cylinder. Part 2. Control by splitter-plate interference , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  Stefan Siegel,et al.  FEEDBACK CONTROL OF A CIRCULAR CYLINDER WAKE IN EXPERIMENT AND SIMULATION (INVITED) , 2003 .

[8]  Bernd R. Noack,et al.  Low-Dimensional Models For Feedback Flow Control. Part II: Control Design and Dynamic Estimation , 2004 .

[9]  Kimon Roussopoulos,et al.  Feedback control of vortex shedding at low Reynolds numbers , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Robert King,et al.  Model-based Control of Vortex Shedding Using Low-dimensional Galerkin Models , 2003 .

[11]  Kelly Cohen,et al.  Sensor Placement for Closed-Loop Flow Control of a "D" Shaped Cylinder Wake , 2004 .

[12]  K. Sreenivasan,et al.  On the formation and suppression of vortex ‘shedding’ at low Reynolds numbers , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Gilead Tadmor,et al.  Nonlinear flow control based on a low dimensional model of fluid flow , 2005 .

[14]  G. Tadmor,et al.  Control, observation and energy regulation of wake flow instabilities , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[15]  B. R. Noack,et al.  A hierarchy of low-dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  K. Lim Method for Optimal Actuator and Sensor Placement for Large Flexible Structures , 1992 .

[17]  P. Holmes,et al.  Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry , 1996 .

[18]  E. Detemple-Laake,et al.  Phenomenology of Kármán vortex streets in oscillatory flow , 1989 .

[19]  B. R. Noack,et al.  Wake stabilization using POD Galerkin models with interpolated modes , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[20]  Clarence W. Rowley,et al.  Model Reduction for fluids, Using Balanced Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2005, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[21]  Gilead Tadmor,et al.  Low-Dimensional Models For Feedback Flow Control. Part I: Empirical Galerkin models , 2004 .