This paper (SPE 124332) was accepted for presentation at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4–7 October 2009, and revised for publication. Original manuscript received for review 2 November 2009. Revised manuscript received for review 11 March 2010. Paper peer approved 26 April 2010. Summary Model-based dynamic optimization of oil production has a significant potential to improve economic life-cycle performance, as has been shown in various studies. However, within these studies, short-term operational objectives are generally neglected. As a result, the optimized injection and production rates often result in a considerable decrease in short-term production performance. In reality, however, it is often these short-term objectives that dictate the course of the operational strategy. Incorporating short-term goals into the life-cycle optimization problem, therefore, is an essential step in model-based life-cycle optimization. We propose a hierarchical optimization structure with multiple objectives. Within this framework, the life-cycle performance in terms of net present value (NPV) serves as the primary objective and shortterm operational performance is the secondary objective, such that optimality of the primary objective constrains the secondary optimization problem. This requires that optimality of the primary objective does not fix all degrees of freedom (DOF) of the decision variable space. Fortunately, the life-cycle optimization problem is generally ill-posed and contains many more decision variables than necessary. We present a method that identifies the redundant DOF in the life-cycle optimization problem, which can subsequently be used in the secondary optimization problem. In our study, we used a 3D reservoir in a fluvial depositional environment with a production life of 7 years. The primary objective is undiscounted NPV, while the secondary objective is aimed at maximizing shortterm production. The optimal life-cycle waterflooding strategy that includes short-term performance is compared to the optimal strategy that disregards short-term performance. The experiment shows a very large increase in short-term production, boosting first-year production by a factor of 2, without significantly compromising optimality of the primary objective, showing a slight drop in NPV of only −0.3%. Our method to determine the redundant DOF in the primary objective function relies on the computation of the Hessian matrix of the objective function with respect to the control variables. Although theoretically rigorous, this method is computationally infeasible for realistically sized problems. Therefore, we also developed a second, more pragmatic, method relying on an alternating sequence of optimizing the primaryand secondary-objective functions. Subsequently, we demonstrated that both methods lead to nearly identical results, which offers scope for application of hierarchical long-term and short-term production optimization to realistically sized flooding-optimization problems.
[1]
Michael Nikolaou,et al.
Self-Learning Reservoir Management
,
2003
.
[2]
P.M.J. Van den Hof,et al.
DEGREES OF FREEDOM ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC DYNAMIC OPTIMAL PLANTWIDE OPERATION
,
2007
.
[3]
Jan Dirk Jansen,et al.
Dynamic Optimization of Waterflooding With Smart Wells Using Optimal Control Theory
,
2004
.
[4]
O. Bosgra,et al.
Controllability, observability and identifiability in single-phase porous media flow
,
2008
.
[5]
Jorge Nocedal,et al.
An analysis of reduced Hessian methods for constrained optimization
,
1991,
Math. Program..
[6]
Dongxiao Zhang,et al.
Efficient Ensemble-Based Closed-Loop Production Optimization
,
2009
.
[7]
Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.
Computational Techniques for Closed-Loop Reservoir Modeling with Application to a Realistic Reservoir
,
2006
.
[8]
Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.
Implementation of Adjoint Solution for Optimal Control of Smart Wells
,
2005
.
[9]
Chunhong Wang,et al.
Production Optimization in Closed-Loop Reservoir Management
,
2009
.
[10]
Okko H. Bosgra,et al.
INTEGRATING MPC AND RTO IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRY BY ECONOMIC DYNAMIC LEXICOGRAPHIC OPTIMIZATION ; AN OPEN-LOOP EXPLORATION
,
2008
.
[11]
P.J.P. Egberts,et al.
Optimal waterflood design using the adjoint method
,
2007
.
[12]
Gijs van Essen,et al.
Robust Waterflooding Optimization of Multiple Geological Scenarios
,
2009
.
[13]
Gijs van Essen,et al.
Robust Waterflooding Optimization of Multiple Geological Scenarios
,
2006
.
[14]
Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.
Hierarchical multiobjective analysis for large-scale systems: Review and current status
,
1988,
Autom..
[15]
Jasbir S. Arora,et al.
Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering
,
2004
.
[16]
Dominique Bonvin,et al.
Dynamic optimization of batch processes: I. Characterization of the nominal solution
,
2003,
Comput. Chem. Eng..
[17]
Michael Nikolaou,et al.
Real-time reservoir management: A multiscale adaptive optimization and control approach
,
2006
.
[18]
Chunhong Wang,et al.
Production Optimization in Closed-Loop Reservoir Management
,
2009
.
[19]
P.M.J. Van den Hof,et al.
Bang-bang control and singular arcs in reservoir flooding
,
2007
.
[20]
Y. Yortsos,et al.
Optimization of fluid front dynamics in porous media using rate control. I. Equal mobility fluids
,
2000
.
[21]
Jan Dirk Jansen,et al.
Waterflooding using closed-loop control
,
2006
.
[22]
Harald Asheim,et al.
Maximization of Water Sweep Efficiency by Controlling Production and Injection Rates
,
1988
.