Continuous Monitoring of Intrathoracic Impedance and Right Ventricular Pressures in Patients With Heart Failure

Background—Hemodynamic monitoring using implantable devices may provide early warning of volume overload in patients with heart failure (HF). This study was designed to prospectively compare information from intrathoracic impedance monitoring and continuous right ventricular pressure measurements in patients with HF. Methods and Results—Sixteen patients with HF (age, 63.5±13.8 years; left ventricular ejection fraction, 23.2±11.3%; New York Heart Association, II and III) and a previous HF decompensation received both a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator providing a daily average of intrathoracic impedance and an implantable hemodynamic monitor providing an estimate of the pulmonary artery diastolic pressure. At the end of a 6-month investigator-blinded period, baseline reference hemodynamic values were determined over 4 weeks during which the patient was clinically stable. A major HF event was defined as HF decompensation requiring hospitalization, IV diuretic treatment, or leading to death. Sixteen major HF events occurred in 10 patients. Within 30 days and 14 days before a major HF event, impedance decreased by 0.12±0.21 &OHgr;/d and 0.20±0.20 &OHgr;/d, respectively, whereas estimated pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure increased by 0.10±0.20 mm Hg/d and 0.16±0.15 mm Hg/d, respectively. During these periods, impedance decreased by 3.8±5.4 &OHgr; (P<0.02) and 4.9±6.1 &OHgr; (P<0.007), respectively, whereas estimated pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure increased by 5.8±5.7 mm Hg (P<0.002) and 6.8±6.1 mm Hg (P<0.001), respectively, compared with baseline. In all patients, impedance and estimated pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure were inversely correlated (r=−0.48±0.25). Within 30 days preceding a major HF event, this correlation improved to r=−0.58±0.24. Conclusions—Decompensated HF develops based on hemodynamic derangements and is preceded by significant changes in intrathoracic impedance and right ventricular pressures during the month prior to a major clinical event. Impedance and pressure changes are moderately correlated. Future research may establish the complementary contribution of both parameters to guide diagnosis and management of patients with HF by implantable devices.

[1]  M. Matthay,et al.  Acute Pulmonary Edema , 2005 .

[2]  D. Reynolds,et al.  Measurement of pulmonary artery diastolic pressure from the right ventricle. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  L. Rydén,et al.  Continuous ambulatory haemodynamic monitoring with an implantable system. The feasibility of a new technique. , 1998, European heart journal.

[4]  G. Huster,et al.  Characterization of the precipitants of hospitalization for heart failure decompensation. , 1998, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[5]  L. Stevenson Tailored therapy to hemodynamic goals for advanced heart failure , 1999, European journal of heart failure.

[6]  K. Kuck,et al.  Focal Atrial Tachycardia Originating from the Musculature of the Coronary Sinus , 2002, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[7]  F. Braunschweig,et al.  Continuous Hemodynamic Monitoring in Heart Failure , 2002, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme , 2003, The Lancet.

[9]  L. Rydén,et al.  Ongoing right ventricular hemodynamics in heart failure: clinical value of measurements derived from an implantable monitoring system. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  W. Abraham,et al.  Continuous Autonomic Assessment in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure: Prognostic Value of Heart Rate Variability Measured by an Implanted Cardiac Resynchronization Device , 2004, Circulation.

[11]  C. O’loughlin,et al.  Clinical deterioration in established heart failure: What is the value of BNP and weight gain in aiding diagnosis? , 2005, European journal of heart failure.

[12]  Simon Stewart,et al.  Financial aspects of heart failure programs of care , 2005, European journal of heart failure.

[13]  L. Stevenson,et al.  Evaluation and monitoring of patients with acute heart failure syndromes. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  M. Matthay,et al.  Clinical practice. Acute pulmonary edema. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Hassan Mansour,et al.  Monitoring of physical activity and heart rate variability in patients with chronic heart failure using cardiac resynchronization devices. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  C. Lau,et al.  Intrathoracic Impedance Monitoring in Patients With Heart Failure: Correlation With Fluid Status and Feasibility of Early Warning Preceding Hospitalization , 2005, Circulation.

[17]  J. Daubert,et al.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Christian Butter,et al.  Clinical utility of intrathoracic impedance monitoring to alert patients with an implanted device of deteriorating chronic heart failure. , 2007, European heart journal.

[19]  P. Schauerte,et al.  European InSync Sentry Observational Study Investigators. Clinical utility of intrathoracic impedance monitoring to alert patients with an implanted device of deteriorating chronic heart failure , 2007 .

[20]  M. Zile,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of an implantable continuous hemodynamic monitor in patients with advanced heart failure: the COMPASS-HF study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  I. Hochberg,et al.  Patterns of alveolar fluid clearance in heart failure. , 2008, International journal of cardiology.

[22]  M. Zile,et al.  Application of implantable hemodynamic monitoring in the management of patients with diastolic heart failure: a subgroup analysis of the COMPASS-HF trial. , 2008, Journal of cardiac failure.