PARTITIONED STRATEGIES FOR OPTIMIZATION IN FSI

In this paper the possibility of the optimization of coupled problems in partitioned approaches is discussed. As a special focus, surface coupled problems of fluid-structure interaction are considered. Well established methods of optimization are analyzed for usage in the context of coupled problems and in particular for a solution through partitioned approaches. The main benefits expected from choosing a partitioned solution strategy as basis for the optimization are: a high flexibility in the usage of different solvers and therefore different approaches for the single-field problems as well as the possibility to apply well tested and sophisticated methods for the modeling of complex problems.

[1]  Patrick Le Tallec,et al.  Numerical methods in sensitivity analysis and shape optimization , 2002, Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology.

[2]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and design optimization of three‐dimensional non‐linear aeroelastic systems by the adjoint method , 2003 .

[3]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  CFD SHAPE OPTIMIZATION USING AN INCOMPLETE-GRADIENT ADJOINT FORMULATION , 2001 .

[4]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Towards FSI for light-weight structures subjected to wind , 2005 .

[5]  F. Daoud,et al.  Filtering and regularization techniques in shape optimization with CAD-free parametrization , 2004 .

[6]  Qian Wang,et al.  Review of formulations for structural and mechanical system optimization , 2005 .

[7]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  A General Finite Element Approach to the form Finding of Tensile Structures by the Updated Reference Strategy , 1999 .

[8]  H. Matthies,et al.  Partitioned but strongly coupled iteration schemes for nonlinear fluid-structure interaction , 2002 .

[9]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Stress‐adapted numerical form finding of pre‐stressed surfaces by the updated reference strategy , 2005 .

[10]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid-structure problems , 2005 .

[11]  P. Tallec,et al.  Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: Momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity , 1998 .

[12]  Manfred Bischoff,et al.  The discrete strain gap method and membrane locking , 2005 .

[13]  Stephane Etienne,et al.  A general approach to sensitivity analysis of fluid–structure interactions , 2005 .

[14]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanskisobieski,et al.  On the sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems , 1988 .

[15]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Accuracy analysis of the semi-analytical method for shape sensitivity calculation , 1988 .

[16]  O. Pironneau,et al.  SHAPE OPTIMIZATION IN FLUID MECHANICS , 2004 .

[17]  Kai-Uwe Bletzinger,et al.  Approximation of derivatives in semi-analytical structural optimization , 2008 .

[18]  E. Ramm,et al.  Models and finite elements for thin-walled structures , 2004 .

[19]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Computational methods for form finding and optimization of shells and membranes , 2005 .

[20]  E. Lund,et al.  Shape design optimization of stationary fluid-structure interaction problems with large displacements and turbulence , 2003 .

[21]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Partitioned analysis of coupled mechanical systems , 2001 .

[22]  A. Jameson.  Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory , 1995 .

[23]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Large scale structural optimization: Computational methods and optimization algorithms , 2001 .

[24]  P. Tallec,et al.  Fluid structure interaction with large structural displacements , 2001 .

[25]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Fluid-Structure Interaction with Light-Weight Structures , 2004 .