The Role of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases in Climate Policy: Analysis Using the MIT IGSM

First steps toward a broad climate agreement, such as the Kyoto Protocol, have focused attention on agreement with less than global geographic coverage. We consider instead a policy that is less comprehensive in term of greenhouse gases (GHGs), including only the non-CO2 GHGs, but is geographically comprehensive. Abating non-CO2 GHGs may be seen as less of a threat to economic development and therefore it may be possible to involve developing countries in such a policy who have thus far resisted limits on CO2 emissions. The policy we consider involves a GHG price of about $15 per ton carbon-equivalent (tce) levied only on the non-CO2 GHGs and held at that level through the century. We estimate that such a policy would reduce the global mean surface temperature in 2100 by about 0.57 C; application of this policy to methane alone would achieve a reduction of 0.3 to 0.4 C. We estimate the Kyoto Protocol in its current form would achieve a 0.30 C reduction in 2100 if all Annex B Parties except the US maintained it as is through the century. Furthermore, we estimate the costs of the non-CO2 policies to be a small fraction of the Kyoto restriction. Whether as a next step to expand the Kyoto Protocol, or as a separate initiative running parallel to it, the world could make substantial progress on limiting climate change by pursuing an agreement to abate the non-CO2 GHGs. The results suggest that it would be useful to proceed on global abatement of non-CO2 GHGs so that lack of progress on negotiations to limit CO2 does not allow these abatement opportunities to slip away.

[1]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A global interactive chemistry and climate model: Formulation and testing , 1998 .

[2]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Transient climate change and net ecosystem production of the terrestrial biosphere , 1998, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[3]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A flexible climate model for use in integrated assessments , 1998 .

[4]  R. Prinn,et al.  Regional Emission Scenarios for HFCs, PFCs and SF6 , 2000 .

[5]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The Cost of Kyoto Protocol Targets : The Case of Japan , 2004 .

[6]  D. Reiner,et al.  The evolution of a climate regime: Kyoto to Marrakech , 2002 .

[7]  M. Sarofim,et al.  Stabilization and global climate policy , 2005 .

[8]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Integrated Global System Model for Climate Policy Assessment: Feedbacks and Sensitivity Studies , 1999 .

[9]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Uncertainty in emissions projections for climate models , 2002 .

[10]  Ronald G. Prinn,et al.  Linking local air pollution to global chemistry and climate , 2000 .

[11]  M. Sarofim,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of Climate Change and Policy Response , 2003 .

[12]  A. McGuire,et al.  Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production , 1993, Nature.

[13]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Modeling non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Abatement , 2003 .

[14]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Linking a global terrestrial biogeochemical model and a 2‐dimensional climate model: implications for the global carbon budget , 1997 .

[15]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Is International Emissions Trading Always Beneficial? , 2004 .

[16]  Richard S. Eckaus,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model : revisions, sensitivities, and comparisons of results , 2001 .

[17]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Emissions trading to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the United States : the McCain-Lieberman Proposal , 2003 .

[18]  R. Prinn,et al.  Impact of emissions, chemistry and climate on atmospheric carbon monoxide: 100-yr predictions from a global chemistry–climate model , 1999 .

[19]  H. Tian,et al.  Effect of interannual climate variability on carbon storage in Amazonian ecosystems , 1998, Nature.

[20]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  An efficient climate model with a 3D ocean and statistical–dynamical atmosphere* , 2002 .

[21]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Multiple Gas Control Under the Kyoto Agreement , 2000 .