Selection of efficient market risk models: Backtesting results evaluation with DEA approach

The paper is focused on the evaluation of different VaR models.Standard approaches evaluate the quantities of VaR violations for one particular confidence level.We propose the application of DEA methodology in order to judge the results assuming different confidence levels. Performance evaluation of financial models for pricing and risk estimation and subsequent selection of models that should be regarded as efficient is one of the most important tasks of financial engineering. The decision-making units in financial institutions consider various criteria, the most important being the correctness of the obtained results. Notwithstanding, some complex decision-making tasks require model evaluation under various circumstances or with different input data. In most cases it happens that a model, which seems to be perfect under given settings, is outperformed by another model, when the conditions change, and that there is no model that dominates under all circumstances. In this paper we suggest to apply a Data envelopment analysis (DEA) as a tool for overall evaluation of market risk estimation models. Instead of suggesting new DEA models, we try to utilize its standard formulation in order to analyze its suitability within a new topic of financial decision-making. Specifically, we evaluate several market risk models combining selected copula functions and marginal distributions over a large set of probability levels.

[1]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Application of VaR methodology to risk management in the stock market in China , 2004, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[2]  G. R. Amin Erratum to A polynomial-time algorithm for finding ε in DEA models , 2009 .

[3]  R. Engle Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation , 1982 .

[4]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  A polynomial-time algorithm for finding epsilon in DEA models , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[5]  Jeremy Berkowitz,et al.  Evaluating Value-at-Risk Models with Desk-Level Data , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[6]  M. Rockinger,et al.  The Copula-GARCH model of conditional dependencies: An international stock market application , 2006 .

[7]  R. Filer,et al.  Ranking of VaR and ES Models: Performance in Developed and Emerging Markets , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  Howard M. Taylor,et al.  On the Distribution of Stock Price Differences , 1967, Oper. Res..

[9]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[10]  J. Zakoian,et al.  GARCH Models: Structure, Statistical Inference and Financial Applications , 2010 .

[11]  François Duc,et al.  Beyond Value-at-Risk , 2012 .

[12]  Paul H. Kupiec,et al.  Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models , 1995 .

[13]  J. Rank Copulas: From theory to application in Finance , 2006 .

[14]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[15]  R. Cont Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues , 2001 .

[16]  Xiaohong Chen,et al.  Estimating risk of foreign exchange portfolio: Using VaR and CVaR based on GARCH–EVT-Copula model , 2010 .

[17]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[18]  E. Luciano,et al.  Copula methods in finance , 2004 .

[19]  Huei-Mei Liang,et al.  Estimating value at risk of portfolio by conditional copula-GARCH method , 2009 .

[20]  Barton A. Smith,et al.  Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas , 1986 .

[21]  S. S. Wilks The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses , 1938 .

[22]  M. Sklar Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges , 1959 .

[23]  Basel ‘Fundamental Review of the Trading Book: A Revised Market Risk Framework’ Second Consultative Document by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision IMPACT ANALYSIS , 2014 .

[24]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  Alternative minimax model for finding the most efficient unit in data envelopment analysis , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[25]  Peter Christoffersen,et al.  Série Scientifique Scientific Series 2003 s-05 Backtesting Value-at-Risk : A Duration-Based Approach , 2003 .

[26]  T. Bollerslev,et al.  Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity , 1986 .

[27]  Matli Si Data envelopment analysis , 2016 .

[28]  Peter F. Christoffersen Evaluating Interval Forecasts , 1998 .

[29]  R. Filer,et al.  Performance in Developed and Emerging Markets , 2013 .

[30]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[31]  T. Tichý,et al.  International Equity Portfolio Risk Modeling: The Case of the NIG Model and Ordinary Copula Functions , 2012 .

[32]  R. Nelsen An Introduction to Copulas , 1998 .