Provenance Information in a Collaborative Knowledge Graph: An Evaluation of Wikidata External References

Wikidata is a collaboratively-edited knowledge graph; it expresses knowledge in the form of subject-property-value triples, which can be enhanced with references to add provenance information. Understanding the quality of Wikidata is key to its widespread adoption as a knowledge resource. We analyse one aspect of Wikidata quality, provenance, in terms of relevance and authoritativeness of its external references. We follow a two-staged approach. First, we perform a crowdsourced evaluation of references. Second, we use the judgements collected in the first stage to train a machine learning model to predict reference quality on a large-scale. The features chosen for the models were related to reference editing and the semantics of the triples they referred to. \(61\%\) of the references evaluated were relevant and authoritative. Bad references were often links that changed and either stopped working or pointed to other pages. The machine learning models outperformed the baseline and were able to accurately predict non-relevant and non-authoritative references. Further work should focus on implementing our approach in Wikidata to help editors find bad references.

[1]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[2]  Maribel Acosta,et al.  Crowdsourcing Linked Data Quality Assessment , 2013, SEMWEB.

[3]  George Forman,et al.  Apples-to-apples in cross-validation studies: pitfalls in classifier performance measurement , 2010, SKDD.

[4]  Benno Stein,et al.  Automatic Vandalism Detection in Wikipedia , 2008, ECIR.

[5]  David R. Musicant,et al.  Getting to the source: where does Wikipedia get its information from? , 2013, OpenSym.

[6]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview , 2000, Bioinform..

[7]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  DeFacto - Deep Fact Validation , 2012, SEMWEB.

[8]  Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, Hong Kong, China, August 05 - 07, 2013 , 2013, OpenSym.

[9]  Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, San Francisco, CA, USA, August 19-21, 2015 , 2015, OpenSym.

[10]  Claudia Müller-Birn,et al.  Peer-production system or collaborative ontology engineering effort: what is Wikidata? , 2015, OpenSym.

[11]  Elisa Bertino,et al.  An Approach to Evaluate Data Trustworthiness Based on Data Provenance , 2008, Secure Data Management.

[12]  Michael Günther,et al.  Introducing Wikidata to the Linked Data Web , 2014, SEMWEB.

[13]  Thomas Steiner,et al.  Bots vs. Wikipedians, Anons vs. Logged-Ins (Redux): A Global Study of Edit Activity on Wikipedia and Wikidata , 2014, OpenSym.

[14]  Markus Krötzsch,et al.  Wikidata , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[15]  Arjen P. de Vries,et al.  Increasing cheat robustness of crowdsourcing tasks , 2013, Information Retrieval.

[16]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  Cheap and Fast – But is it Good? Evaluating Non-Expert Annotations for Natural Language Tasks , 2008, EMNLP.

[17]  Omar Alonso,et al.  Crowdsourcing for relevance evaluation , 2008, SIGF.

[18]  Olaf Hartig,et al.  Using Web Data Provenance for Quality Assessment , 2009, SWPM.

[19]  Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl,et al.  Wikidatians are Born: Paths to Full Participation in a Collaborative Structured Knowledge Base , 2017, HICSS.

[20]  Peter Triantafillou,et al.  Crowdsourcing Taxonomies , 2012, ESWC.

[21]  Giancarlo Guizzardi,et al.  Applying a Multi-Level Modeling Theory to Assess Taxonomic Hierarchies in Wikidata , 2016, WWW.

[22]  Olaf Hartig Provenance Information in the Web of Data , 2009, LDOW.

[23]  Jan Maarten Schraagen,et al.  Trust in wikipedia: how users trust information from an unknown source , 2010, WICOW '10.

[24]  Thomas Pellissier Tanon,et al.  From Freebase to Wikidata: The Great Migration , 2016, WWW.

[25]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revoltionary (rev. ed.) , 2001 .

[26]  Adam Wierzbicki,et al.  On the subjectivity and bias of web content credibility evaluations , 2013, WWW.

[27]  Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.  Finding News Citations for Wikipedia , 2016, CIKM.