Local and landscape-scale forest attributes differ in their impact on bird assemblages across years in forest production landscapes

Abstract Forest management practices and forest fragmentation are commonly recognised as factors influencing species distribution and diversity, but it remains largely unknown how species turnover and fluctuations across years might affect generalisations from short-term predictions. There is also much uncertainty about how compositional heterogeneity within forests, through their partitioning into differently managed stands, influences species occurrence and diversity. We aimed to investigate bird species richness in different forest stands in a heterogeneous landscape and asked whether short-term studies commonly used are sufficient to describe diversity–habitat relationships. Breeding birds were monitored in 50 stands of differing forest types and management regimes in 2008 and 2009 in the heterogeneous forest production landscape of the Schwabische Alb in SW Germany. Based on a database of 25 and 21 species observed in 2008 and 2009, respectively, we estimated local species richness and species turnover with Bayesian hierarchical multi-species occupancy models to account for imperfect detection. A suite of forest attributes at stand level (from local field inventories) and landscape level, between 100 and 2000 m in extent, which were derived from forest management maps, were screened for their explanatory power regarding bird species richness. The most meaningful variables were included in a final set of models to account for effects of forest attributes on species occurrence and resulting gradients in species richness and turnover. Bird species richness in 2008 was mostly explained by stand composition heterogeneity over a distance of 800 m around sample locations, whereas in 2009 local stand features like stand succession type and stand age mostly explained species richness. Species turnover was significantly higher in young forest stands of thicket and pole-wood stages compared with old forest stands of timber stages. Variable multi-scale impacts of forest attributes on local species richness and turnover, together with year-to-year fluctuations in the regional species pool, emphasise that the relative importance of local versus landscape-scale factors in determining bird species richness may vary across years. Long-term and multiple-scale investigations that take structural and compositional forest heterogeneity into account are necessary for improved prediction of species–habitat relationships.

[1]  Matthew G Betts,et al.  Thresholds in Songbird Occurrence in Relation to Landscape Structure , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Inference About Species Richness and Community Structure Using Species-Specific Occupancy Models in the National Swiss Breeding Bird Survey MHB , 2009 .

[3]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Estimating Size and Composition of Biological Communities by Modeling the Occurrence of Species , 2005 .

[4]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[5]  Sedat Keleş,et al.  Spatial forest planning: A review , 2005 .

[6]  Matthew G. Betts,et al.  Dynamic occupancy models reveal within-breeding season movement up a habitat quality gradient by a migratory songbird , 2008 .

[7]  Brandon T Bestelmeyer,et al.  Cross-scale interactions, nonlinearities, and forecasting catastrophic events. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  J. Krebs,et al.  Should conservation strategies consider spatial generality? Farmland birds show regional not national patterns of habitat association. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[10]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Do forest community types provide a sufficient basis to evaluate biological diversity , 2008 .

[11]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review , 1994 .

[12]  Jens Nieschulze,et al.  Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: The Biodiversity Exploratories , 2010 .

[13]  R. Holt,et al.  A Survey and Overview of Habitat Fragmentation Experiments , 2000 .

[14]  E. Kalko,et al.  Patterns of resource use in an assemblage of birds in the canopy of a temperate alluvial forest , 2009, Journal of Ornithology.

[15]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis , 2007 .

[16]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION EFFECTS , 2002 .

[17]  A. Baselga Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity , 2010 .

[18]  Charles M. Francis,et al.  Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  V. Grimm,et al.  Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures , 2004 .

[20]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  ESTIMATING THE PARAMETERS OF SURVIVAL AND MIGRATION OF INDIVIDUALS IN METAPOPULATIONS , 2000 .

[21]  Carsten Thies,et al.  REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management , 2005 .

[22]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Impacts of forest fragmentation on species richness: a hierarchical approach to community modelling , 2009 .

[23]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Species richness and occupancy estimation in communities subject to temporary emigration. , 2009, Ecology.

[24]  David M Marsh,et al.  Current Trends in Plant and Animal Population Monitoring , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[25]  James S. Clark,et al.  UNCERTAINTY AND VARIABILITY IN DEMOGRAPHY AND POPULATION GROWTH: A HIERARCHICAL APPROACH , 2003 .

[26]  T. Benton,et al.  Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? , 2003 .

[27]  R. Virkkala,et al.  Spatial Variation of Bird Species in Landscapes Dominated by Old-growth Forests in Northern Boreal Finland , 2006, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[28]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  HABITAT LOSS AND FRAGMENTATION IN DYNAMIC LANDSCAPES: AVIAN PERSPECTIVES FROM THE BOREAL FOREST* , 2002 .

[29]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[30]  Philippe Janssen,et al.  Beetle diversity in a matrix of old-growth boreal forest: influence of habitat heterogeneity at multiple scales. , 2009 .

[31]  L. Merrick,et al.  Natural Resource Ecology and Management 8-2007 Homogenization of Northern U . S . Great Lakes Forests Due to Land Use , 2017 .

[32]  Michael S. Mitchell,et al.  USING LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL DATA TO PREDICT THE DISTRIBUTION OF BIRDS ON A MANAGED FOREST: EFFECTS OF SCALE , 2001 .

[33]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Ecological Sustainability of Birds in Boreal Forests , 1998 .

[34]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  A Bayesian state-space formulation of dynamic occupancy models. , 2007, Ecology.

[35]  H. Possingham,et al.  Can multiscale models of species’ distribution be generalized from region to region? A case study of the koala , 2008 .

[36]  W. Link,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS OF POPULATION CHANGE WITH APPLICATION TO CERULEAN WARBLERS , 2002 .

[37]  M. Conroy,et al.  Modeling demographic processes in marked populations , 2009 .

[38]  A. Solow,et al.  Measuring biological diversity , 2006, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[39]  J. Nichols,et al.  Forest fragmentation and bird community dynamics: inference at regional scales , 2001 .

[40]  A. Magurran,et al.  Measuring Biological Diversity , 2004 .

[41]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[42]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[43]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[44]  W. Jetz,et al.  Linking global turnover of species and environments , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape , 2000, Nature.

[46]  R. Schooley,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity in Habitat Quality and Cross-Scale Interactions in Metapopulations , 2007, Ecosystems.

[47]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Analysis of Multinomial Models With Unknown Index Using Data Augmentation , 2007, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics.

[48]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.