Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants.

Gap detection thresholds were measured as an indication of the amount of interaction between electrodes in a cochlear implant. The hypothesis in this study was as follows: when the two stimuli that bound the gap stimulate the same electrode, and thus the same neural population, the gap detection threshold will be short. As two stimuli are presented to two electrodes that are more widely separated, the amount of neural overlap of the two stimuli decreases, the stimuli sound more dissimilar, and the gap thresholds increase. Gap detection thresholds can thus be used to infer the amount of overlap in neural populations stimulated by two electrodes. Three users of the Nucleus cochlear implant participated in this study. Gap detection thresholds were measured as a function of the distance between the two electrode pairs and as a function of the spacing between the two electrodes of a bipolar pair (i.e., using different modes of stimulation). The results indicate that measuring gap detection thresholds may provide an estimate of the amount of electrode interaction. Gap detection thresholds were a function of the physical separation of the electrode pairs used for the two stimuli that bound the gap. Lower gap thresholds were observed when the two electrode pairs were closely spaced, and gap thresholds increased as the separation increased, resulting in a "psychophysical tuning curve" as a function of electrode separation. The sharpness of tuning varied across subjects, and for the three subjects in this study, the tuning was generally sharper for the subjects with better speech recognition. The data also indicate that increasing the separation between active and reference electrodes has limited effect on spatial selectivity (or tuning) as measured perceptually.

[1]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the Nucleus cochlear implant , 1988 .

[3]  William F. House,et al.  Cochlear Implants: Histopathologic Findings Related to Performance in 16 Human Temporal Bones , 1991, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[4]  P J Blamey,et al.  Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve , 1987, Hearing Research.

[6]  Pierre L. Divenyi,et al.  Discrimination of time intervals marked by brief acoustic pulses of various intensities and spectra , 1977 .

[7]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[8]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  R. M. Sachs,et al.  Discrimination of time intervals bounded by tone bursts , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  P. Fitzgibbons,et al.  Temporal gap detection in noise as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J H Grose,et al.  Gap detection for pairs of noise bands: effects of stimulus level and frequency separation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  B C Moore,et al.  Gap detection as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  R. Shannon,et al.  Within-channel gap detection using dissimilar markers in cochlear implant listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  R. Plomp Rate of Decay of Auditory Sensation , 1964 .

[15]  The effect of marker variability on the discrimination of temporal intervals , 1976 .

[16]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  A comparison of speech perception of cochlear implantees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the MSP (MULTIPEAK) processor. , 1992, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[18]  T. G. Forrest,et al.  The role of frequency selectivity in measures of auditory and vibrotactile temporal resolution. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Dirk Van Compernolle,et al.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  S Buus,et al.  Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  L M Collins,et al.  Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  R V Shannon,et al.  Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  W.A. Kalender,et al.  Unwrapping cochlear implants by spiral CT , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  J. Nadol,et al.  Patterns of degeneration in the human cochlear nerve , 1995, Hearing Research.

[25]  G M Clark,et al.  Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction , 1983, Hearing Research.

[27]  P R Kileny,et al.  Effects of channel number and place of stimulation on performance with the Cochlear Corporation multichannel implant. , 1992, The American journal of otology.

[28]  T. G. Forrest,et al.  Detection of silent temporal gaps in sinusoidal markers. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  An advanced multiple channel cochlear implant , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  R V Shannon,et al.  Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.