Policy makers’ perceptions on the transformational effect of Web 2.0 technologies on public services delivery

The growing participation in social networking sites is altering the nature of social relations and changing the nature of political and public dialogue. This paper contributes to the current debate on Web 2.0 technologies and their implications for local governance, identifying the perceptions of policy makers on the use of Web 2.0 in providing public services and on the changing roles that could arise from the resulting interaction between local governments and their stakeholders. The results obtained suggest that policy makers are willing to implement Web 2.0 technologies in providing public services, but preferably under the Bureaucratic model framework, thus retaining a leading role in this implementation. The learning curve of local governments in the use of Web 2.0 technologies is a factor that could influence policy makers' perceptions. In this respect, many research gaps are identified and further study of the question is recommended.

[1]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Emily Christofides,et al.  Information Disclosure and Control on Facebook: Are They Two Sides of the Same Coin or Two Different Processes? , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[3]  Patrice McDermott,et al.  Building open government , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[6]  Girish J. Gulati,et al.  Towards E-participation in the Middle East and Northern Europe , 2010 .

[7]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[8]  John A. Taylor,et al.  The Information Polity: Towards a two speed future? , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[9]  David Weinberger,et al.  Small Pieces Loosely Joined (a unified theory of the web) , 2002 .

[10]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  The Second Wave of Digital Era Governance , 2010 .

[12]  Bianca C. Reisdorf,et al.  THE PARTICIPATORY WEB , 2012 .

[13]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Judit García-Martín,et al.  Patterns of Web 2.0 tool use among young Spanish people , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[17]  J. Ignacio Criado,et al.  E‐government in practice , 2003 .

[18]  Staci M. Zavattaro,et al.  Social Media and Public Administration , 2011 .

[19]  P. Dreier,et al.  The rebirth of urban democracy , 1993 .

[20]  Rebecca MacKinnon,et al.  China's Censorship 2.0: How Companies Censor Bloggers , 2009, First Monday.

[21]  Stephen J. Conroy,et al.  Ethical Attitudes of Accountants: Recent Evidence from a Practitioners’ Survey , 2007 .

[22]  Jordi Graells-Costa,et al.  Administración colaborativa y en red , 2011 .

[23]  M. Barzelay,et al.  Public Management Policymaking in Spain: The Politics of Legislative Reform of Administrative Structures, 1991–1997 , 2010 .

[24]  Bernardino Benito,et al.  Financial reports and decentralization in municipal governments , 2006 .

[25]  J. Kooiman,et al.  Governing as Governance , 2003 .

[26]  Craig J. Russell,et al.  Moderated Regression Analysis and Likert Scales: Too Coarse for Comfort , 1992 .

[27]  Albert Jacob Meijer,et al.  Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American police departments , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  A. Egido Facebook, la red social por excelencia: IV Estudio Anual de Redes Sociales del IAB Spain , 2013 .

[29]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  Cory Cromer,et al.  Understanding web 2.0’s influences on public e-services: a protection Motivation perspective , 2010 .

[31]  M. Bovens,et al.  From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control , 2002 .

[32]  Albert Meijer,et al.  Networked Coproduction of Public Services in Virtual Communities: From a Government-Centric to a Community Approach to Public Service Support. , 2011 .

[33]  Daniel Mintz,et al.  Government 2.0-Fact or Fiction? the Second Generation of Web Access Will Change the Way Government Delivers Services and Its Relationship with the American Public , 2007 .

[34]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry , 1998 .

[35]  Juan-Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro,et al.  E-government and citizen's engagement with local affairs through e-websites: The case of Spanish municipalities , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[36]  Katrien G. Luijkx,et al.  The Relationship Between Governance Roles and Performance in Local Public Interorganizational Networks , 2012 .

[37]  Rui Gomes,et al.  Contributions to the Development of Local e-Government 2.0 , 2012, Future Internet.

[38]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Government innovation through social media , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Policy making 2.0: From theory to practice , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[40]  John R. Hibbing,et al.  Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs About How Government Should Work , 2002 .

[41]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  A comparative analysis of learning curves: Implications for new technology implementation management , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[43]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Study I: Reliability and Validity , 1971 .

[44]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Managers in Governance Networks: How to Reach Good Outcomes? , 2011 .

[45]  M. Jennings,et al.  Internet Use and Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2003 .

[46]  Rebecca MacKinnon Flatter world and thicker walls? Blogs, censorship and civic discourse in China , 2007 .

[47]  Charles Kaylor,et al.  Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[48]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[49]  B. Noveck Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful , 2009 .

[50]  S S Buckman,et al.  PARALLLEL DEVELOPMENT IN BRACHIOPODA. , 1906, Science.

[51]  Jane Fedorowicz,et al.  A Learning Curve Analysis of Expert System Use , 1992 .

[52]  D. Hodge,et al.  Phrase Completions: An Alternative to Likert Scales. , 2003 .

[53]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  The future of governing , 1996 .

[54]  Carla Ruiz-Mafé,et al.  Social Network Loyalty: Evaluating the Role of attitude, Perceived Risk and Satisfaction , 2013, Online Inf. Rev..

[55]  Mary Anne Kennan,et al.  The State of the Nation: A Snapshot of Australian Institutional Repositories , 2009, First Monday.

[56]  Johan Christiaens,et al.  Financial Accounting Reform in Flemish Municipalities: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[57]  Jae Choi,et al.  Information Technology Skill Management Strategies for Implementing New Technologies: A Case of Service-Oriented Architecture , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[58]  Paul E. Spector Summated rating scale construction , 1991 .