Learning at the Edges: Challenges to the Sustain- ability of Service Learning in Higher Education

Service-learning in higher education has gained increasing attention in recent years, but at most universities it remains an activity that is largely peripheral to the dominant concerns of the institution. Service learning has generally been defined as coursework that places undergraduates in community-service activities and relates those activities to academic content. In principle, service-learning courses engage students in activities that involve service of some sort to the neighboring community and provide the occasion to reflect on their participation in those activities, thus connecting service to classroom instruction. In this way, service learning both extends learning beyond the classroom and brings the real world into the classroom. In practice, however, because of the manner in which service-learning programs have been established at many universities, primarily from higher administrative units, the tendency has been for service-learning programs to become marginalized. That is, they take place outside the academic mainstream of campus life — in many cases, outside traditional academic departments — and enjoy relatively little departmental or institutional commitment. This tendency represents a serious challenge to the long-term sustainability of universities’ servicelearning partnerships with schools and community organizations. In this article, we attempt to make both practical and theoretical contributions to the literature on service learning. On one hand, we focus pragmatically on the sustainability of service learning efforts, given the institutional culture of the university. On the other hand, we also examine service learning through the lens of sociocultural theory, as a form of learning through apprenticeship. Our intent is to understand the multiLearning at the Edges: Challenges to the Sustainability of Service Learning in Higher Education

[1]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Experience and Education. , 1974 .

[2]  Lucinda Pease-Alvarez,et al.  Pushing Boundaries: Language and Culture in a Mexicano Community , 1994 .

[3]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  PART II: Out-of-School Learning: The Case of an after-School Computer Club , 1997 .

[4]  R. Carver,et al.  Theoretical underpinnings of service learning , 1997 .

[5]  Charles M. Keller,et al.  Cognition and Tool Use: The Blacksmith at Work , 1996 .

[6]  W. Blanton,et al.  Effects of Participation in the Fifth Dimension on Far Transfer , 1997 .

[7]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  What Do Children Learn from Using Computers in an Informal, Collaborative Setting?. , 1999 .

[8]  J. Lave Understanding practice: The practice of learning , 1993 .

[9]  Miriam W. Schustack,et al.  Learning about Technology in a Non-Instructional Environment , 1997 .

[10]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[11]  M. Cole Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline? , 1996, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[12]  Carol W. Kinsley Service Learning: A Process To Connect Learning and Living , 1997 .

[13]  B. Rogoff Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context , 1990 .

[14]  E. H. Ondaatje,et al.  Combining Service and Learning in Higher Education , 2000 .

[15]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Consequences of Participation in a “Fifth Dimension” after-School Computer Club , 1997 .

[16]  B. Rogoff Cognition as a collaborative process. , 1998 .

[17]  Michael Cole,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Cultural psychology: Some general principles and a concrete example , 1999 .

[18]  Shelly S. Hinck,et al.  Service Learning: Connecting Citizenship with the Classroom , 1997 .

[19]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .