Conflicts in Knowledge Management: Visiting the Hidden Partner

As knowledge gains a reputation for being a critical resource in the information-intensive economy, organizations have doubled their efforts in trying to extract value from knowledge management policies. One particular aspect of knowledge management, which has gone unnoticed in academic research, is the presence of conflicts in knowledge activities. By adopting a conflict perspective of knowledge activities, this study arrives at a two-dimensional framework that defines knowledge conflicts in terms of its type and nature. Central to this paper is the fundamental idea that conflicts form an integral part of knowledge management and depending on how they are managed; conflicts may be formidable partners or dangerous adversaries in the corporate quest for knowledge-derived competitiveness.

[1]  G. Krogh.  Care in Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[2]  Gary Hackbarth,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on IT Systems , 1998 .

[3]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .

[4]  Kim,et al.  Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement , 1986 .

[5]  Judy E. Scott.  Facilitating Interorganizational Learning with Information Technology , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[7]  H. Kelley.  Personal Relationships: Their Structures and Processes , 1979 .

[8]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[9]  R. Field.  Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management , 1989 .

[10]  Steven E. Prokesch.  \Unleashing the Power of Learning: An Interview with British Petroleum's John Browne , 1997 .

[11]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[12]  R. Grant.  Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[13]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[14]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  The `ART' of knowledge:: Systems to capitalize on market knowledge , 1998 .

[15]  M. Grant,et al.  Communities of practice. , 2020, Health progress.

[16]  G. Walsham.  Knowledge Management:: The Benefits and Limitations of Computer Systems , 2001 .

[17]  Margaret A. Neale,et al.  Who's Really Sharing? Effects of Social and Expert Status on Knowledge Exchange Within Groups , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[18]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[19]  J. Storck,et al.  Knowledge Diffusion through “Strategic Communities” , 2000 .

[20]  K. Jehn.  ENHANCING EFFECTIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF VALUE‐BASED INTRAGROUP CONFLICT , 1994 .

[21]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Seeking Knowledge in Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Exploratory Study , 2001, ICIS.

[22]  R. Kahn,et al.  Organizational psychology. , 1967, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  T. Davenport,et al.  Improving Knowledge Work Processes , 1996 .

[24]  Philip Powell,et al.  Knowledge Transfer Under Coopetition , 1998 .

[25]  Conflict management in the Asia Pacific : assumptions and approaches in diverse cultures , 1998 .

[26]  Alexandre B. Lopes,et al.  The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action , 1999 .

[27]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[28]  K. Thomas.  Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. , 1992 .

[29]  B. Brehmer.  Social Judgment Theory and the Analysis of Interpersonal Conflict. , 1976 .

[30]  PinsonneaultAlain,et al.  Anonymity in group support systems research , 1997 .

[31]  Alexander Laszlo,et al.  Evolving knowledge for development: the role of knowledge management in a changing world , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[32]  I. Mitroff.  Talking past one's colleagues in matters of policy , 1982 .

[33]  James M. Matarazzo,et al.  The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions: by Chan Wei Choo. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. 298p. $60.00 (hardcover). ISBN 0-19-511011-0. $25.95 (softcover). ISBN 0-19-511012-9 , 1998 .

[34]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[35]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Managing conflict at organizational interfaces , 1982 .

[36]  J. Spender.  Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory , 1996 .

[37]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[38]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[39]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  The Factory as a Learning Laboratory , 2000 .

[40]  Michael Parent,et al.  Knowledge creation in focus groups: can group technologies help? , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[41]  Stephen P. Robbins,et al.  Managing organizational conflict;: A nontraditional approach , 1974 .

[42]  J. Bartunek,et al.  Hidden Conflict In Organizations: Uncovering Behind-the-Scenes Disputes , 1991 .

[43]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[44]  M. Deutsch.  The Resolution of ConflictConstructive and Destructive Processes , 1974 .

[45]  F. Blackler.  KNOWLEDGE AND THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS: ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AND THE REFRAMING OF MANAGEMENT* , 1993 .

[46]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  SYSTEMS TO SUPPORT GROUP WORK , 2000 .

[47]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  The Adoption and Use of GSS in Project Teams: Toward More Participative Processes and Outcomes , 2003, MIS Q..

[48]  David C. Wilson,et al.  COMPLEXITY AND CLEAVAGE: DUAL EXPLANATIONS OF STRATEGIC DECISION‐MAKING [I] , 1982 .

[49]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[50]  Kristin Braa,et al.  Interpretation, intervention, and reduction in the organizational laboratory: a framework for in-context information system research , 1999 .

[51]  P. Drucker.  Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[52]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  SOCIAL IDENTITY MAINTENANCE PRESCRIPTIONS FOR PREVENTING GROUPTHINK: REDUCING IDENTITY PROTECTION AND ENHANCING INTELLECTUAL CONFLICT , 1994 .

[53]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Anonymity in Group Support Systems Research: A New Conceptualization, Measure, and Contingency Framework , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[54]  B. Kabanoff.  Equity, Equality, Power, and Conflict , 1991 .

[55]  Abraham B. Shani,et al.  Organization design and the knowledge worker , 1995 .

[56]  Paula L. Rechner,et al.  Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making , 1989 .

[57]  J. King,et al.  Hardwiring Weak Ties: Interorganizational Computer-Mediated Communication, Occupational Communities, and Organizational Change , 1995 .

[58]  I. Janis.  Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management , 1989 .

[59]  R. Baron,et al.  Reducing organizational conflict: an incompatible response approach. , 1984, The Journal of applied psychology.

[60]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Cultural diversity''s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diver , 1993 .

[61]  Davydd J. Greenwood.  Action research : from practice to writing in an international action research development program , 1999 .

[62]  David Vance,et al.  On the Requirements of Knowledge Transfer Using Information Systems: A Schema Whereby Such Transfer Is Enhanced , 1998 .

[63]  J. A. Wall,et al.  Conflict and Its Management , 1995 .

[64]  Charles R. Schwenk.  Conflict in organizational decision making: an exploratory study of its effects in for-profit and not-for-profit organizations , 1990 .