Force Feedback Benefit Depends on Experience in Multiple Degree of Freedom Robotic Surgery Task

Force feedback has been suggested to provide a number of benefits to surgery. Few studies, however, have addressed the benefit of force feedback in the context of the complexities of true surgical tasks. When information is limited (such as depth information in endoscopically guided tasks), force feedback may provide additional information that improves performance. We investigate a two-handed, six degree of freedom, endoscopically guided, minimally invasive cannulation task (inserting one tube into another tube) to test this hypothesis. We used twelve subjects, six of whom were experienced minimally invasive surgeons. Results suggest that force feedback reduces applied forces for both subject groups, but only the surgically trained group can take advantage of this benefit without a significant increase in trial time. We hypothesize that this training difference is due to the interaction between visual-spatial motor abilities and the information contained in the mechanical interaction forces.

[1]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[2]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Virtual peg-in-hole performance using a 6-DOF magnetic levitation haptic device: comparison with real forces and with visual guidance alone , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[3]  A. Isla,et al.  Advantages of laparoscopic stented choledochorrhaphy over T‐tube placement , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  Christopher R. Wagner,et al.  The role of force feedback in surgery: analysis of blunt dissection , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[5]  S. Connor,et al.  Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2006, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  D. Yuh,et al.  Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery. , 2004, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[7]  Arif Kazi,et al.  Operator Performance in Surgical Telemanipulation , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[8]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  Minimally Invasive Surgery: Empirical Comparison of Manual and Robot Assisted Force Feedback Surgery , 2004 .

[9]  H. Xina,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery , perceptual limitations and force : A review , 2006 .

[10]  G M Preminger,et al.  Three-dimensional video imaging for endoscopic surgery. , 1995, Computers in biology and medicine.

[11]  Breedveld Wentink,et al.  Eye-hand coordination in laparoscopy - an overview of experiments and supporting aids , 2001, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[12]  L. MacKenzie,et al.  Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic surgery: a human factors approach to investigating the operating room environment , 2001, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[13]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  Sensing and Manipulation Problems in Endoscopic Surgery: Experiment, Analysis, and Observation , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  J. Frisby,et al.  Depth cue reliance in surgeons and medical students , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[15]  Christopher R. Wagner,et al.  Force Feedback in a Three-Dimensional Ultrasound-Guided Surgical Task , 2006, 2006 14th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[16]  Warren D. Smith,et al.  Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[17]  N. Nugent,et al.  Low incidence of retained common bile duct stones using a selective policy of biliary imaging. , 2005, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[18]  Mahdi Tavakoli,et al.  Haptic feedback and sensory substitution during telemanipulated suturing , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[19]  A. Castellanos,et al.  Force Feedback Plays a Significant Role in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Results and Analysis , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[20]  Ronald J Franzino The Laprotek surgical system and the next generation of robotics. , 2003, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[21]  Christopher R. Wagner,et al.  Mechanisms of performance enhancement with force feedback , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[22]  Neil Stringer,et al.  Only stereo information improves performance in surgical tasks , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[23]  F Tendick,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic imaging systems and conditions using a knot-tying task. , 1997, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[24]  P. Breedveld,et al.  Endoscopic camera rotation: a conceptual solution to improve hand-eye coordination in minimally-invasive surgery , 2000 .

[25]  J. Shah,et al.  Can tonic accommodation predict surgical performance? , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.