Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Dispositions of Self-Identified Libertarians

Libertarians are an increasingly prominent ideological group in U.S. politics, yet they have been largely unstudied. Across 16 measures in a large web-based sample that included 11,994 self-identified libertarians, we sought to understand the moral and psychological characteristics of self-described libertarians. Based on an intuitionist view of moral judgment, we focused on the underlying affective and cognitive dispositions that accompany this unique worldview. Compared to self-identified liberals and conservatives, libertarians showed 1) stronger endorsement of individual liberty as their foremost guiding principle, and weaker endorsement of all other moral principles; 2) a relatively cerebral as opposed to emotional cognitive style; and 3) lower interdependence and social relatedness. As predicted by intuitionist theories concerning the origins of moral reasoning, libertarian values showed convergent relationships with libertarian emotional dispositions and social preferences. Our findings add to a growing recognition of the role of personality differences in the organization of political attitudes.

[1]  Joshua D. Greene.  Dual-process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie , 2009 .

[2]  P. Rozin,et al.  The Moralization of Cigarette Smoking in the United States , 1999 .

[3]  S. McFarland,et al.  Who believes that identification with all humanity is ethical , 2008 .

[4]  Patrick Dattalo,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis , 2008 .

[5]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals , 2009 .

[6]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[7]  D. O. Sears.  College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[8]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective , 2005 .

[9]  Donelson R. Forsyth,et al.  Personal moral philosophies and moral choice , 1990 .

[10]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Comparing Oral Interviewing with Self-Administered Computerized QuestionnairesAn Experiment , 2010 .

[11]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  J. Brehm,et al.  Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control , 1981 .

[13]  A. Glenn.  How can studying psychopaths help us understand the neural mechanisms of moral judgment? , 2010, Cellscience.

[14]  S. Read,et al.  Connectionism, Parallel Constraint Satisfaction Processes, and Gestalt Principles: (Re)Introducing Cognitive Dynamics to Social Psychology , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[15]  P. Bloom,et al.  Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. , 2009, Emotion.

[16]  J. Haidt,et al.  Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  P. Rozin.  Social Psychology and Science: Some Lessons From Solomon Asch , 2001 .

[18]  P. J. Conover,et al.  The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications. , 1981 .

[19]  D. McAdams.  What Do We Know When We Know a Person , 1995 .

[20]  E. Deci,et al.  The Darker and Brighter Sides of Human Existence: Basic Psychological Needs as a Unifying Concept , 2000 .

[21]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[22]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Mapping the moral domain. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[24]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Having your cake and eating it too: discourses of transcendence and their role in organizational change dynamics , 2011 .

[25]  J. Abramowitz,et al.  The Disgust Scale: item analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement. , 2007, Psychological assessment.

[26]  S. Frederick.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[27]  J. Graham,et al.  When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize , 2007 .

[28]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  I. Berlin,et al.  Four Essays on Liberty , 1969 .

[30]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[31]  Peter Laslett,et al.  Two Treatises of Government , 1948 .

[32]  Jesse Graham,et al.  Above and Below Left–Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations , 2009 .

[33]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  From left to right: how the personality system allows basic traits to influence politics via characteristic moral adaptations. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[34]  Donelson R. Forsyth,et al.  Individual Differences in Information Integration During Moral Judgment , 1985 .

[35]  G. Lakoff.  Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think , 1996 .

[36]  D. Mitchell.  The S.U.V. model of citizenship: floating bubbles, buffer zones, and the rise of the “purely atomic” individual , 2005 .

[37]  Nicholas J. G. Winter.  Masculine Republicans and Feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ Explicit and Implicit Images of the Political Parties , 2010 .

[38]  T. Wheatley,et al.  Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe , 2005, Psychological science.

[39]  C. Batson,et al.  Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  D. Keltner,et al.  Disgust and the moralization of purity. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The virtue of selfishness. , 1988 .

[42]  D. McAdams,et al.  A new Big Five: fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[43]  W. James.  Varieties of Religious Experience , 2008 .

[44]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. , 1982 .

[45]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo , 2004 .

[46]  P. Rozin.  The Process of Moralization , 1999 .

[47]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Behavioral genetics and personality: Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd Edition) , 1990 .

[48]  Sung-Mook Hong,et al.  Refinement of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale , 1996 .

[49]  J. Haidt.  The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology , 2007, Science.

[50]  J. Krosnick,et al.  National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality , 2009 .

[51]  Clifford P. McCue,et al.  Dispositional Empathy and the Political Gender Gap , 2000 .

[52]  R. McNally,et al.  Fundamentalists and liberals : personality characteristics of Protestant Christians , 1998 .

[53]  Jonathan Haidt,et al.  Morality , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[54]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of Individualism and Collectivism: A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement , 1995 .

[55]  A. Damasio.  The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness , 1999 .

[56]  Hanna Damasio,et al.  Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  A. Liau,et al.  Moral Cognition: Explaining the Gender Difference in Antisocial Behavior , 2001 .

[58]  Kenneth I. Mavor,et al.  Aligning Identities, Emotions, and Beliefs to Create Commitment to Sustainable Social and Political Action , 2009, Personality and Social Psychology Review.

[59]  J. Hunter.  Culture Wars: The Struggle To Define America , 1991 .

[60]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[61]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[62]  D. Murphey,et al.  The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion , 2013 .

[63]  Clark McCauley,et al.  Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors , 1994 .

[64]  P. Rozin,et al.  The CAD triad hypothesis: a mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  J. Rawls,et al.  A Theory of Justice , 1971, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[66]  Mark H. Davis.  Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[67]  P. Rozin,et al.  Moralization and Becoming a Vegetarian: The Transformation of Preferences Into Values and the Recruitment of Disgust , 1997 .

[68]  F. Wallbrown,et al.  Psychological reactance and its relationship to normal personality variables , 1994, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[69]  J. Graham,et al.  Beyond Beliefs: Religions Bind Individuals Into Moral Communities , 2010, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[70]  E. Uhlmann,et al.  The motivated use of moral principles , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[71]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies , 1993 .

[72]  S. Gosling,et al.  Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[73]  Thomas Sowell.  A conflict of visions : ideological origins of political struggles , 1988 .

[74]  S. Gosling,et al.  The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind , 2008 .

[75]  B. R. Schlenker.  Social psychology and science. , 1974 .

[76]  P. Tetlock,et al.  The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[77]  D. McAdams.  Personality, Modernity, and the Storied Self: A Contemporary Framework for Studying Persons , 1996 .

[78]  D. Forsyth.  A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. , 1980 .

[79]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[80]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.